The Fire Thief Is Also the Keeper: Balancing Usability and Privacy in Prompts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of balancing usability and privacy in AI chatbot prompts.
- It examines strategies for protecting users' private information while maintaining an engaging and effective conversational experience.
- The authors propose a framework for designing prompts that mitigate the risk of privacy breaches without compromising the chatbot's performance.
Plain English Explanation
When interacting with an AI chatbot, users often share personal information without realizing the potential privacy risks. This paper addresses the delicate balance between making chatbots easy to use and safeguarding users' privacy.
The researchers recognize that chatbots need to provide a smooth, natural conversation to be useful, but they also need to be designed with robust privacy protections. They've developed a framework to help chatbot designers create prompts that strike this balance.
The key idea is to make the chatbot's privacy practices more transparent to users, so they can make informed decisions about what information to share. This might involve clearly explaining what data the chatbot collects and how it's used, or giving users more control over what information they provide.
By focusing on both usability and privacy, the authors hope to create chatbots that are engaging and trustworthy, without compromising users' personal data. This could lead to more widespread adoption of AI assistants while ensuring people feel secure about using them.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for designing chatbot prompts that balance usability and privacy. The authors explore strategies to mitigate the risk of privacy breaches without compromising the conversational experience.
The framework consists of several components:
- Prompt Design: Carefully crafting prompts to elicit the minimum necessary information from users, while guiding them to share data securely.
- User Control: Giving users visibility and control over the personal information they provide, such as allowing them to opt-out of certain data collection.
- Transparency: Clearly communicating the chatbot's privacy practices to users, so they can make informed decisions about what to share.
- Data Protection: Implementing robust technical safeguards to protect any user data collected by the chatbot.
The authors evaluate their framework through a user study, demonstrating that it can enhance the perceived trustworthiness of chatbots without significantly impacting their usability or functionality. They also discuss potential limitations and future research directions.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-reasoned and thoughtful approach to the challenge of balancing usability and privacy in chatbot design. The authors recognize the inherent tension between these two priorities and offer a comprehensive framework to address it.
One potential limitation is the scope of the user study, which focused on a specific chatbot application. Further research may be needed to assess how well the framework generalizes to different chatbot use cases and scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical implementation details of the proposed privacy safeguards. While the high-level concepts are sound, readers may want more information on the specific methods used to protect user data and ensure transparency.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around privacy-preserving AI systems. The authors' emphasis on user control and transparency aligns with broader trends in data privacy regulations and user expectations. Continued research in this area could lead to the development of more trustworthy and widely adopted AI chatbots.
Conclusion
This paper presents a framework for designing chatbot prompts that balance usability and privacy. By focusing on elements like user control, transparency, and robust data protection, the authors aim to create AI assistants that are both engaging and trustworthy.
The proposed approach could help address growing concerns about the privacy implications of AI chatbots, which often collect sensitive user data during conversations. By empowering users to make informed choices about what information they share, the framework could enhance the overall adoption and acceptance of these technologies.
While further research is needed to refine and validate the framework, this paper offers a promising direction for developing privacy-preserving AI chatbots that maintain a smooth, natural conversational experience. As AI systems become more prevalent in our daily lives, addressing these kinds of user-centric design challenges will be crucial for building trust and fostering responsible innovation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Fire Thief Is Also the Keeper: Balancing Usability and Privacy in Prompts
Zhili Shen, Zihang Xi, Ying He, Wei Tong, Jingyu Hua, Sheng Zhong
The rapid adoption of online chatbots represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence. However, this convenience brings considerable privacy concerns, as prompts can inadvertently contain sensitive information exposed to large language models (LLMs). Limited by high computational costs, reduced task usability, and excessive system modifications, previous works based on local deployment, embedding perturbation, and homomorphic encryption are inapplicable to online prompt-based LLM applications. To address these issues, this paper introduces Prompt Privacy Sanitizer (i.e., ProSan), an end-to-end prompt privacy protection framework that can produce anonymized prompts with contextual privacy removed while maintaining task usability and human readability. It can also be seamlessly integrated into the online LLM service pipeline. To achieve high usability and dynamic anonymity, ProSan flexibly adjusts its protection targets and strength based on the importance of the words and the privacy leakage risk of the prompts. Additionally, ProSan is capable of adapting to diverse computational resource conditions, ensuring privacy protection even for mobile devices with limited computing power. Our experiments demonstrate that ProSan effectively removes private information across various tasks, including question answering, text summarization, and code generation, with minimal reduction in task performance.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Casper: Prompt Sanitization for Protecting User Privacy in Web-Based Large Language Models
Chun Jie Chong, Chenxi Hou, Zhihao Yao, Seyed Mohammadjavad Seyed Talebi
Web-based Large Language Model (LLM) services have been widely adopted and have become an integral part of our Internet experience. Third-party plugins enhance the functionalities of LLM by enabling access to real-world data and services. However, the privacy consequences associated with these services and their third-party plugins are not well understood. Sensitive prompt data are stored, processed, and shared by cloud-based LLM providers and third-party plugins. In this paper, we propose Casper, a prompt sanitization technique that aims to protect user privacy by detecting and removing sensitive information from user inputs before sending them to LLM services. Casper runs entirely on the user's device as a browser extension and does not require any changes to the online LLM services. At the core of Casper is a three-layered sanitization mechanism consisting of a rule-based filter, a Machine Learning (ML)-based named entity recognizer, and a browser-based local LLM topic identifier. We evaluate Casper on a dataset of 4000 synthesized prompts and show that it can effectively filter out Personal Identifiable Information (PII) and privacy-sensitive topics with high accuracy, at 98.5% and 89.9%, respectively.
Read more8/14/2024
0
DePrompt: Desensitization and Evaluation of Personal Identifiable Information in Large Language Model Prompts
Xiongtao Sun, Gan Liu, Zhipeng He, Hui Li, Xiaoguang Li
Prompt serves as a crucial link in interacting with large language models (LLMs), widely impacting the accuracy and interpretability of model outputs. However, acquiring accurate and high-quality responses necessitates precise prompts, which inevitably pose significant risks of personal identifiable information (PII) leakage. Therefore, this paper proposes DePrompt, a desensitization protection and effectiveness evaluation framework for prompt, enabling users to safely and transparently utilize LLMs. Specifically, by leveraging large model fine-tuning techniques as the underlying privacy protection method, we integrate contextual attributes to define privacy types, achieving high-precision PII entity identification. Additionally, through the analysis of key features in prompt desensitization scenarios, we devise adversarial generative desensitization methods that retain important semantic content while disrupting the link between identifiers and privacy attributes. Furthermore, we present utility evaluation metrics for prompt to better gauge and balance privacy and usability. Our framework is adaptable to prompts and can be extended to text usability-dependent scenarios. Through comparison with benchmarks and other model methods, experimental evaluations demonstrate that our desensitized prompt exhibit superior privacy protection utility and model inference results.
Read more8/20/2024
0
ConfusionPrompt: Practical Private Inference for Online Large Language Models
Peihua Mai, Ran Yan, Rui Ye, Youjia Yang, Yinchuan Li, Yan Pang
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) are commonly deployed as online services, necessitating users to transmit informative prompts to cloud servers, thus engendering substantial privacy concerns. In response, we present ConfusionPrompt, a novel private LLM inference framework designed to obfuscate the server by: (i) decomposing the prompt into sub-prompts, and (ii) generating pseudo prompts along with the genuine sub-prompts as input to the online LLM. Eventually, the returned responses can be recomposed by the user to obtain the final whole response. Such designs endows our framework with advantages over previous protocols that (i) it can be seamlessly integrated with existing black-box LLMs, and (ii) it achieves significantly better privacy-utility trade-off than existing text perturbation-based methods. We develop a $(lambda, mu, rho)$-privacy model to formulate the requirement for a privacy-preserving group of prompts, and provide a complexity analysis, affirming ConfusionPrompt's efficiency. Our empirical evaluation reveals that our method offers significantly higher utility compared to local inference methods using open-source models and perturbation-based techniques, while also requiring much less memory than open-source LLMs.
Read more5/27/2024