Follow-up Attention: An Empirical Study of Developer and Neural Model Code Exploration
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent neural models like OpenAI Codex and AlphaCode have shown impressive code generation abilities due to their attention mechanism.
- However, it's often unclear how these models actually process and reason about code, and how their attention mechanism compares to how developers explore and understand code.
- Understanding the model's reasoning process is important to leverage these models beyond just their raw prediction capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the attention signals of three large language models for code - CodeGen, InCoder, and GPT-J - align with how developers visually explore and make sense of code. The researchers created an eye-tracking dataset where developers performed code understanding tasks, and then evaluated different ways of processing the models' attention signals to see how well they matched the developers' attention patterns.
The goal is to better understand how these large language models for code actually work under the hood, beyond just their ability to generate code. By seeing how their attention aligns with human attention, the researchers hope to unlock new ways to leverage these models for more effective code exploration and understanding, rather than just raw code generation.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the attention mechanisms of three open large language models for code - CodeGen, InCoder, and GPT-J - and compares them to how human developers visually explore and make sense of code.
The researchers created an open-source eye-tracking dataset of 92 manually-labeled sessions from 25 developers engaged in code understanding tasks. They then evaluated five heuristic approaches and ten attention-based post-processing methods to see how well the models' attention signals aligned with the developers' gaze patterns.
One novel approach they introduced is "follow-up attention", which exhibited the highest agreement between model and human attention. This method can predict the next line a developer will look at with 47% accuracy, outperforming a baseline of 42.3% that uses the session history of other developers.
The results demonstrate the potential of leveraging the attention signals of pre-trained language models to better understand how they process and reason about code, and to enable more effective code exploration and understanding tools.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by empirically studying the alignment between model attention and human attention during code understanding tasks. This offers insights into how these large language models actually process and reason about code, beyond just their raw prediction capabilities.
However, the study is limited to just three specific models - CodeGen, InCoder, and GPT-J. While these are prominent examples, the findings may not generalize to other model architectures or future developments in the field. Additionally, the eye-tracking dataset, while a useful resource, only captures a relatively small number of developers (25) and tasks.
Further research would be needed to validate the findings across a wider range of models, developers, and coding tasks. It would also be interesting to explore how the attention mechanisms of these models evolve as they are fine-tuned or adapted for specific coding domains or applications.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards understanding the inner workings of large language models for code, by examining how their attention signals align with how human developers visually explore and make sense of code. The novel "follow-up attention" approach demonstrated promising results in predicting developers' attention patterns.
These insights could unlock new ways to leverage these powerful models beyond just code generation, enabling more effective code exploration and understanding tools. As the capabilities of language models continue to advance, understanding their reasoning process will be crucial to unlocking their full potential in supporting and augmenting human developers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Follow-up Attention: An Empirical Study of Developer and Neural Model Code Exploration
Matteo Paltenghi, Rahul Pandita, Austin Z. Henley, Albert Ziegler
Recent neural models of code, such as OpenAI Codex and AlphaCode, have demonstrated remarkable proficiency at code generation due to the underlying attention mechanism. However, it often remains unclear how the models actually process code, and to what extent their reasoning and the way their attention mechanism scans the code matches the patterns of developers. A poor understanding of the model reasoning process limits the way in which current neural models are leveraged today, so far mostly for their raw prediction. To fill this gap, this work studies how the processed attention signal of three open large language models - CodeGen, InCoder and GPT-J - agrees with how developers look at and explore code when each answers the same sensemaking questions about code. Furthermore, we contribute an open-source eye-tracking dataset comprising 92 manually-labeled sessions from 25 developers engaged in sensemaking tasks. We empirically evaluate five heuristics that do not use the attention and ten attention-based post-processing approaches of the attention signal of CodeGen against our ground truth of developers exploring code, including the novel concept of follow-up attention which exhibits the highest agreement between model and human attention. Our follow-up attention method can predict the next line a developer will look at with 47% accuracy. This outperforms the baseline prediction accuracy of 42.3%, which uses the session history of other developers to recommend the next line. These results demonstrate the potential of leveraging the attention signal of pre-trained models for effective code exploration.
Read more8/30/2024
💬
0
Do Large Language Models Pay Similar Attention Like Human Programmers When Generating Code?
Bonan Kou, Shengmai Chen, Zhijie Wang, Lei Ma, Tianyi Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been widely used for code generation. Due to the complexity and opacity of LLMs, little is known about how these models generate code. We made the first attempt to bridge this knowledge gap by investigating whether LLMs attend to the same parts of a task description as human programmers during code generation. An analysis of six LLMs, including GPT-4, on two popular code generation benchmarks revealed a consistent misalignment between LLMs' and programmers' attention. We manually analyzed 211 incorrect code snippets and found five attention patterns that can be used to explain many code generation errors. Finally, a user study showed that model attention computed by a perturbation-based method is often favored by human programmers. Our findings highlight the need for human-aligned LLMs for better interpretability and programmer trust.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Attention Heads of Large Language Models: A Survey
Zifan Zheng, Yezhaohui Wang, Yuxin Huang, Shichao Song, Bo Tang, Feiyu Xiong, Zhiyu Li
Since the advent of ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in various tasks but remain largely as black-box systems. Consequently, their development relies heavily on data-driven approaches, limiting performance enhancement through changes in internal architecture and reasoning pathways. As a result, many researchers have begun exploring the potential internal mechanisms of LLMs, aiming to identify the essence of their reasoning bottlenecks, with most studies focusing on attention heads. Our survey aims to shed light on the internal reasoning processes of LLMs by concentrating on the interpretability and underlying mechanisms of attention heads. We first distill the human thought process into a four-stage framework: Knowledge Recalling, In-Context Identification, Latent Reasoning, and Expression Preparation. Using this framework, we systematically review existing research to identify and categorize the functions of specific attention heads. Furthermore, we summarize the experimental methodologies used to discover these special heads, dividing them into two categories: Modeling-Free methods and Modeling-Required methods. Also, we outline relevant evaluation methods and benchmarks. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current research and propose several potential future directions. Our reference list is open-sourced at url{https://github.com/IAAR-Shanghai/Awesome-Attention-Heads}.
Read more9/6/2024
0
A new approach for encoding code and assisting code understanding
Mengdan Fan, Wei Zhang, Haiyan Zhao, Zhi Jin
Some companies(e.g., Microsoft Research and Google DeepMind) have discovered some of the limitations of GPTs autoregressive paradigm next-word prediction, manifested in the model lack of planning, working memory, backtracking, and reasoning skills. GPTs rely on a local and greedy process of generating the next word, without a global understanding of the task or the output.We have confirmed the above limitations through specialized empirical studies of code comprehension. Although GPT4 is good at producing fluent and coherent text, it cannot handle complex logic and generate new code that haven not been seen, and it relies too much on the formatting of the prompt to generate the correct code.We propose a new paradigm for code understanding that goes beyond the next-word prediction paradigm, inspired by the successful application of diffusion techniques to image generation(Dalle2, Sora) and protein structure generation(AlphaFold3), which have no autoregressive constraints.Instead of encoding the code in a form that mimics natural language, we encode the code as a heterogeneous image paradigm with a memory of global information that mimics both images and protein structures.We then refer to Sora's CLIP upstream text-to-image encoder model to design a text-to-code encoder model that can be applied to various downstream code understanding tasks.The model learns the global understanding of code under the new paradigm heterogeneous image, connects the encoding space of text and code, and encodes the input of text into the vector of code most similar to it.Using self-supervised comparative learning on 456,360 text-code pairs, the model achieved a zero-shot prediction of new data. This work is the basis for future work on code generation using diffusion techniques under a new paradigm to avoid autoregressive limitations.
Read more8/2/2024