Formalising Anti-Discrimination Law in Automated Decision Systems
0
🌐
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper explores the challenges of formalizing anti-discrimination law in the context of automated decision systems.
• It examines how to translate legal concepts of non-discrimination into concrete technical requirements for algorithmic systems.
• The research aims to bridge the gap between the legal and technical domains to ensure fair and equitable decision-making in high-stakes applications.
Plain English Explanation
Laws prohibiting discrimination exist to protect people from unfair treatment based on characteristics like race, gender, or age. However, as more decisions are made by algorithms and automated systems, it becomes crucial to ensure these systems also comply with anti-discrimination laws.
The researchers in this paper tackle the challenge of translating legal concepts of non-discrimination into technical requirements that can be implemented in algorithmic decision-making. This is important because the way laws are written may not always translate directly to the technical specifications of an AI system.
By bridging the gap between the legal and technical domains, the researchers aim to help develop algorithms and automated decision-making processes that are fair and equitable, avoiding biases or discrimination against protected groups. This is crucial in high-stakes applications like hiring, lending, or criminal justice where automated decisions can have significant impacts on people's lives.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines how to formally encode anti-discrimination principles, such as those found in the EU General Data Protection Regulation or the U.S. Civil Rights Act, into the technical specifications of automated decision systems.
The researchers propose a framework that translates legal concepts of non-discrimination into constraints and requirements that can be integrated into the design and evaluation of AI-powered decision-making. This includes defining notions of fairness, identifying protected characteristics, and specifying rules to ensure equitable outcomes.
The paper also discusses the challenges of reconciling the different perspectives and priorities of the legal and technical domains, as well as the trade-offs that may arise when trying to satisfy both legal and algorithmic requirements for fairness. The researchers emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach that brings together legal experts, policymakers, and AI researchers.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussions around the challenges of bridging the gap between algorithms and anti-discrimination law. The researchers acknowledge the complexity of this task and the potential tensions that may arise when trying to satisfy both legal and technical requirements for fairness.
One limitation of the research is its focus on a theoretical framework, without extensive practical implementation and evaluation. The researchers emphasize the need for further work to test the proposed approaches in real-world settings and to address the practical implications of AI and anti-discrimination law.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the philosophical and ethical debates around the concept of fairness in machine learning. Addressing these deeper questions could further strengthen the theoretical foundations of the proposed framework.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards formalizing the translation of anti-discrimination law into the technical specifications of automated decision systems. By bridging the gap between the legal and technical domains, the researchers aim to help ensure that algorithmic decision-making processes are fair, equitable, and comply with relevant laws and regulations.
While the proposed framework is a valuable contribution, the researchers acknowledge the need for continued interdisciplinary collaboration and practical implementation to address the complex challenges at the intersection of law, policy, and AI. Ongoing research and dialogue in this area will be crucial to upholding principles of non-discrimination in the age of algorithmic decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
0
Formalising Anti-Discrimination Law in Automated Decision Systems
Holli Sargeant, M{aa}ns Magnusson
We study the legal challenges in automated decision-making by analysing conventional algorithmic fairness approaches and their alignment with antidiscrimination law in the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions based on English common law. By translating principles of anti-discrimination law into a decision-theoretic framework, we formalise discrimination and propose a new, legally informed approach to developing systems for automated decision-making. Our investigation reveals that while algorithmic fairness approaches have adapted concepts from legal theory, they can conflict with legal standards, highlighting the importance of bridging the gap between automated decisions, fairness, and anti-discrimination doctrine.
Read more7/2/2024
⛏️
0
Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law
Giorgos Giannopoulos, Maria Psalla, Loukas Kavouras, Dimitris Sacharidis, Jakub Marecek, German M Matilla, Ioannis Emiris
In this paper we examine algorithmic fairness from the perspective of law aiming to identify best practices and strategies for the specification and adoption of fairness definitions and algorithms in real-world systems and use cases. We start by providing a brief introduction of current anti-discrimination law in the European Union and the United States and discussing the concepts of bias and fairness from an legal and ethical viewpoint. We then proceed by presenting a set of algorithmic fairness definitions by example, aiming to communicate their objectives to non-technical audiences. Then, we introduce a set of core criteria that need to be taken into account when selecting a specific fairness definition for real-world use case applications. Finally, we enumerate a set of key considerations and best practices for the design and employment of fairness methods on real-world AI applications
Read more5/1/2024
❗
0
Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms
Daniele Regoli, Alessandro Castelnovo, Nicole Inverardi, Gabriele Nanino, Ilaria Penco
In recent years, the increase in the usage and efficiency of Artificial Intelligence and, more in general, of Automated Decision-Making systems has brought with it an increasing and welcome awareness of the risks associated with such systems. One of such risks is that of perpetuating or even amplifying bias and unjust disparities present in the data from which many of these systems learn to adjust and optimise their decisions. This awareness has on the one hand encouraged several scientific communities to come up with more and more appropriate ways and methods to assess, quantify, and possibly mitigate such biases and disparities. On the other hand, it has prompted more and more layers of society, including policy makers, to call for fair algorithms. We believe that while many excellent and multidisciplinary research is currently being conducted, what is still fundamentally missing is the awareness that having fair algorithms is per se a nearly meaningless requirement that needs to be complemented with many additional social choices to become actionable. Namely, there is a hiatus between what the society is demanding from Automated Decision-Making systems, and what this demand actually means in real-world scenarios. In this work, we outline the key features of such a hiatus and pinpoint a set of crucial open points that we as a society must address in order to give a concrete meaning to the increasing demand of fairness in Automated Decision-Making systems.
Read more8/15/2024
🎯
0
State of the Art in Fair ML: From Moral Philosophy and Legislation to Fair Classifiers
Elias Baumann, Josef Lorenz Rumberger
Machine learning is becoming an ever present part in our lives as many decisions, e.g. to lend a credit, are no longer made by humans but by machine learning algorithms. However those decisions are often unfair and discriminating individuals belonging to protected groups based on race or gender. With the recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into effect, new awareness has been raised for such issues and with computer scientists having such a large impact on peoples lives it is necessary that actions are taken to discover and prevent discrimination. This work aims to give an introduction into discrimination, legislative foundations to counter it and strategies to detect and prevent machine learning algorithms from showing such behavior.
Read more5/28/2024