State of the Art in Fair ML: From Moral Philosophy and Legislation to Fair Classifiers
1811.09539
0
0
šÆ
Abstract
Machine learning is becoming an ever present part in our lives as many decisions, e.g. to lend a credit, are no longer made by humans but by machine learning algorithms. However those decisions are often unfair and discriminating individuals belonging to protected groups based on race or gender. With the recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into effect, new awareness has been raised for such issues and with computer scientists having such a large impact on peoples lives it is necessary that actions are taken to discover and prevent discrimination. This work aims to give an introduction into discrimination, legislative foundations to counter it and strategies to detect and prevent machine learning algorithms from showing such behavior.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Machine learning is being used to make important decisions that impact people's lives, such as whether to approve a credit application.
- However, these algorithms can exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior towards individuals from protected groups based on race or gender.
- With the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), there is a growing awareness of these issues, and it is crucial that steps are taken to discover and prevent discrimination in machine learning.
- This work aims to provide an introduction to the problem of discrimination, the legal foundations for addressing it, and strategies for detecting and preventing discriminatory behavior in machine learning algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning algorithms are increasingly being used to make important decisions that affect people's lives, such as determining whether to approve a credit application. However, these algorithms can sometimes exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior, where they treat individuals belonging to protected groups (e.g., based on race or gender) differently and potentially worse than others.
With the recent implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), there is now a greater awareness of these issues. Given the significant impact that computer scientists and machine learning researchers have on people's lives, it is essential that steps are taken to identify and prevent discrimination in these algorithms.
This work aims to provide an introduction to the problem of discrimination, the legal foundations for addressing it, and strategies for detecting and preventing discriminatory behavior in machine learning algorithms. By understanding these issues and taking proactive measures, researchers and developers can help ensure that machine learning is used in a fair and responsible manner.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the growing use of machine learning algorithms in making important decisions that affect people's lives, such as credit approvals. However, these algorithms can sometimes exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior, where they treat individuals belonging to protected groups (e.g., based on race or gender) differently and potentially worse than others.
With the recent implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), there is now a greater awareness of these issues. The paper notes that given the significant impact that computer scientists and machine learning researchers have on people's lives, it is essential that steps are taken to identify and prevent discrimination in these algorithms.
The work aims to provide an introduction to the problem of discrimination, the legal foundations for addressing it, and strategies for detecting and preventing discriminatory behavior in machine learning algorithms. This includes discussing approaches for measuring and mitigating algorithmic bias and taxonomies for understanding fairness in large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable overview of the important issue of discrimination in machine learning, highlighting the need for researchers and developers to take proactive steps to address this problem. The discussion of the legal foundations, such as the GDPR, is particularly relevant, as it underscores the growing regulatory focus on ensuring fairness and non-discrimination in the use of algorithmic systems.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the technical details of the various strategies for detecting and preventing discrimination. While the high-level discussion is useful, readers may benefit from more specific information on the different approaches for achieving fairness in machine learning models, such as the trade-offs and considerations involved in implementing them.
Additionally, the paper could have explored some of the broader societal implications of discrimination in machine learning, such as the potential to exacerbate existing inequalities or the ethical considerations around the use of these technologies. Addressing these issues could help readers better understand the importance of the research and its potential impact on the wider community.
Conclusion
This work provides a valuable introduction to the critical issue of discrimination in machine learning, highlighting the growing importance of addressing this problem as these algorithms become more prevalent in decision-making processes that impact people's lives. By understanding the legal foundations and the strategies for detecting and preventing discriminatory behavior, researchers and developers can play a crucial role in ensuring that machine learning is used in a fair and responsible manner, with the ultimate goal of promoting greater equity and inclusion.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šļø
Aleatoric and Epistemic Discrimination: Fundamental Limits of Fairness Interventions
Hao Wang, Luxi He, Rui Gao, Flavio P. Calmon
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models can underperform on certain population groups due to choices made during model development and bias inherent in the data. We categorize sources of discrimination in the ML pipeline into two classes: aleatoric discrimination, which is inherent in the data distribution, and epistemic discrimination, which is due to decisions made during model development. We quantify aleatoric discrimination by determining the performance limits of a model under fairness constraints, assuming perfect knowledge of the data distribution. We demonstrate how to characterize aleatoric discrimination by applying Blackwell's results on comparing statistical experiments. We then quantify epistemic discrimination as the gap between a model's accuracy when fairness constraints are applied and the limit posed by aleatoric discrimination. We apply this approach to benchmark existing fairness interventions and investigate fairness risks in data with missing values. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art fairness interventions are effective at removing epistemic discrimination on standard (overused) tabular datasets. However, when data has missing values, there is still significant room for improvement in handling aleatoric discrimination.
4/17/2024
ā
The Impossibility of Fair LLMs
Jacy Anthis, Kristian Lum, Michael Ekstrand, Avi Feller, Alexander D'Amour, Chenhao Tan
0
0
The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs). However, the increasing complexity of human-AI interaction and its social impacts have raised questions of how fairness standards could be applied. Here, we review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness, such as group fairness and fair representations, and find that their application to LLMs faces inherent limitations. We show that each framework either does not logically extend to LLMs or presents a notion of fairness that is intractable for LLMs, primarily due to the multitudes of populations affected, sensitive attributes, and use cases. To address these challenges, we develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases: the criticality of context, the responsibility of LLM developers, and the need for stakeholder participation in an iterative process of design and evaluation. Moreover, it may eventually be possible and even necessary to use the general-purpose capabilities of AI systems to address fairness challenges as a form of scalable AI-assisted alignment.
6/6/2024
āļø
Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law
Giorgos Giannopoulos, Maria Psalla, Loukas Kavouras, Dimitris Sacharidis, Jakub Marecek, German M Matilla, Ioannis Emiris
0
0
In this paper we examine algorithmic fairness from the perspective of law aiming to identify best practices and strategies for the specification and adoption of fairness definitions and algorithms in real-world systems and use cases. We start by providing a brief introduction of current anti-discrimination law in the European Union and the United States and discussing the concepts of bias and fairness from an legal and ethical viewpoint. We then proceed by presenting a set of algorithmic fairness definitions by example, aiming to communicate their objectives to non-technical audiences. Then, we introduce a set of core criteria that need to be taken into account when selecting a specific fairness definition for real-world use case applications. Finally, we enumerate a set of key considerations and best practices for the design and employment of fairness methods on real-world AI applications
5/1/2024
A tutorial on fairness in machine learning in healthcare
Jianhui Gao, Benson Chou, Zachary R. McCaw, Hilary Thurston, Paul Varghese, Chuan Hong, Jessica Gronsbell
0
0
$textbf{OBJECTIVE}$: Ensuring that machine learning (ML) algorithms are safe and effective within all patient groups, and do not disadvantage particular patients, is essential to clinical decision making and preventing the reinforcement of existing healthcare inequities. The objective of this tutorial is to introduce the medical informatics community to the common notions of fairness within ML, focusing on clinical applications and implementation in practice. $textbf{TARGET AUDIENCE}$: As gaps in fairness arise in a variety of healthcare applications, this tutorial is designed to provide an understanding of fairness, without assuming prior knowledge, to researchers and clinicians who make use of modern clinical data. $textbf{SCOPE}$: We describe the fundamental concepts and methods used to define fairness in ML, including an overview of why models in healthcare may be unfair, a summary and comparison of the metrics used to quantify fairness, and a discussion of some ongoing research. We illustrate some of the fairness methods introduced through a case study of mortality prediction in a publicly available electronic health record dataset. Finally, we provide a user-friendly R package for comprehensive group fairness evaluation, enabling researchers and clinicians to assess fairness in their own ML work.
6/18/2024