Fostering Trust and Quantifying Value of AI and ML

Overview

• AI and ML providers have a responsibility to develop valid and reliable systems
• There are challenges around building trust in AI/ML inferences (predictions or task solutions from trained models)
• The paper examines the dynamic of trust between providers (Trustors) and users (Trustees), and proposes a framework to measure trustworthiness of ML systems

Plain English Explanation

As artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems become more widely adopted, it's important that the companies developing them ensure the systems are valid, reliable, and trustworthy. Users need to be able to trust the inferences or predictions made by these AI/ML models.

However, there isn't a clear definition of what it means for an AI/ML system to be "trustworthy." Topics like transparency, explainability, safety, and bias are important, but there aren't frameworks to quantify and measure them.

This paper looks at the relationship between the AI/ML providers (called "Trustors") and the users (called "Trustees"). Trustors need to be both trusting and trustworthy, while Trustees don't necessarily need to be either. The challenge is for Trustors to produce results good enough that Trustees will increase their trust to a minimum threshold, both to do business and to continue using the service.

The paper proposes a framework and set of metrics to calculate a "trust score" - a way to objectively measure how trustworthy a given AI/ML system can claim to be, and how that changes over time. This could help build greater trust in AI/ML systems and lead to more widespread adoption.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by examining the dynamics of trust between AI/ML providers (the "Trustors") and the users of their systems (the "Trustees"). Trustors must be both trusting and trustworthy, while Trustees do not necessarily need to exhibit those qualities.

The key challenge for Trustors is to deliver results that are "good enough" to raise a Trustee's trust above a minimum threshold - both for the initial business relationship, and for the Trustee to continue using the service long-term. To address this, the paper proposes a framework and set of metrics to calculate a "trust score" that can objectively quantify the trustworthiness of a given AI/ML system.

The framework involves defining trust dimensions, identifying associated metrics, and combining those into an overall trust score. The suggested trust dimensions include:

• Transparency: How well the system's inner workings and decision-making process are explained
• Explainability: How intelligible the system's outputs and predictions are to human users
• Safety: The system's reliability, robustness, and ability to avoid harmful mistakes
• Fairness: The system's lack of discrimination or bias

By measuring these factors and compiling them into a trust score, the framework aims to provide a quantitative way for Trustors to demonstrate the trustworthiness of their AI/ML systems to potential Trustees.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the need to define and measure trustworthiness in AI/ML systems. As these technologies become more ubiquitous, it is crucial that users can trust the inferences and decisions produced by the models.

However, the proposed framework is still high-level, and further research would be needed to operationalize the specific metrics and weighting schemes. Additionally, the framework focuses on the provider's perspective (the Trustor), when end-user trust may also depend on factors beyond the provider's control, such as the user's own familiarity with AI/ML.

There are also open questions around how to handle evolving trust over time, as models are updated and retrained. The framework suggests tracking trust scores, but doesn't address scenarios where a model's trustworthiness may decrease after deployment due to data drift or other issues.

Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for defining and measuring trustworthiness in AI/ML, but more work is needed to develop a comprehensive, practical system that can be widely adopted by the industry.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the critical challenge of building trust in AI and machine learning systems. By examining the dynamic between providers (Trustors) and users (Trustees), it proposes a framework for quantifying the trustworthiness of ML models through measures of transparency, explainability, safety, and fairness.

Implementing such a framework could help AI/ML providers demonstrate the reliability of their systems, fostering greater user confidence and enabling wider adoption of these powerful technologies. However, further research is needed to refine the specific metrics and address evolving trust over time.

Ultimately, developing trustworthy AI is an essential step towards realizing the full potential of these systems to positively transform industries and society. This paper represents an important contribution to the ongoing journey towards trustworthy AI.