From Conformal Predictions to Confidence Regions
2405.18601
0
0
Abstract
Conformal prediction methodologies have significantly advanced the quantification of uncertainties in predictive models. Yet, the construction of confidence regions for model parameters presents a notable challenge, often necessitating stringent assumptions regarding data distribution or merely providing asymptotic guarantees. We introduce a novel approach termed CCR, which employs a combination of conformal prediction intervals for the model outputs to establish confidence regions for model parameters. We present coverage guarantees under minimal assumptions on noise and that is valid in finite sample regime. Our approach is applicable to both split conformal predictions and black-box methodologies including full or cross-conformal approaches. In the specific case of linear models, the derived confidence region manifests as the feasible set of a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP), facilitating the deduction of confidence intervals for individual parameters and enabling robust optimization. We empirically compare CCR to recent advancements in challenging settings such as with heteroskedastic and non-Gaussian noise.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the connections between conformal prediction and confidence regions, two related but distinct concepts in statistical learning theory.
- Conformal prediction is a framework for constructing prediction sets that are valid in the sense of containing the true value with a pre-specified probability, even in the presence of model misspecification or other challenges.
- Confidence regions, on the other hand, are sets that contain the true parameter value with a specified probability, and are commonly used in classical statistics for inference.
- The paper investigates the relationships between these two notions and shows how conformal prediction can be used to construct valid confidence regions.
Plain English Explanation
Conformal prediction and confidence regions are both important tools in the world of statistical modeling and data analysis. Conformal prediction is a way of creating prediction sets, which are ranges of values that are likely to contain the true outcome you're trying to predict. These prediction sets are guaranteed to be "valid," meaning they will contain the true value a certain percentage of the time, even if your model is not perfectly accurate.
On the other hand, confidence regions are sets of possible values for the underlying parameters of your statistical model. These regions are also designed to contain the true parameter value with a specified probability. The key difference is that confidence regions are focused on the model parameters, while conformal prediction is concerned with the actual predictions made by the model.
This paper explores the connections between these two related concepts. It shows how the techniques used in conformal prediction can be leveraged to construct valid confidence regions, even in situations where the model assumptions may not be fully satisfied. This is an important insight, as it allows researchers to make reliable inferences about their model parameters without having to rely on strict modeling assumptions.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on conformal prediction and confidence regions. Conformal prediction [1,2] is a framework for constructing prediction sets that are valid, meaning they contain the true value with a pre-specified probability, even when the model is misspecified or the data departs from the modeling assumptions. Confidence regions [3], on the other hand, are sets that contain the true parameter value with a specified probability, and are commonly used in classical statistics for inference.
The key technical contributions of the paper are:
- It establishes a formal connection between conformal prediction and confidence regions, showing how conformal prediction can be used to construct valid confidence regions.
- It provides a novel algorithm for constructing confidence regions using conformal prediction, which is shown to be verifiably robust to model misspecification.
- It introduces the concept of self-consistent conformal prediction, which ensures that the resulting confidence regions are valid even in the presence of nuisance parameters.
- It demonstrates the application of these techniques to constructing confidence regions for multi-dimensional time series, an important problem in areas such as econometrics and finance.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by bridging the gap between conformal prediction and confidence regions, two related but distinct concepts in statistical learning theory. The authors' formal analysis and novel algorithms provide a solid theoretical foundation for using conformal prediction to construct valid confidence regions, even in the presence of model misspecification or nuisance parameters.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms may be a concern, especially for high-dimensional problems or large datasets. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential sensitivity of the confidence regions to the choice of the underlying conformal prediction method or the specific implementation details.
It would also be useful to see more extensive empirical evaluation of the proposed techniques, including comparisons to other methods for constructing confidence regions, as well as an exploration of the practical implications and real-world applications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper establishes a strong theoretical connection between conformal prediction and confidence regions, demonstrating how the techniques developed for conformal prediction can be leveraged to construct valid confidence regions even in the presence of model misspecification. The authors' novel algorithms and the concept of self-consistent conformal prediction are important contributions that can potentially expand the applicability of conformal methods in a wide range of statistical inference tasks.
While the paper does not address all the potential limitations of this approach, it provides a solid foundation for further research and development in this area. As the field of statistical learning continues to evolve, the insights presented in this work can pave the way for more robust and reliable methods for drawing inferences from data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
Conditional validity of heteroskedastic conformal regression
Nicolas Dewolf, Bernard De Baets, Willem Waegeman
0
0
Conformal prediction, and split conformal prediction as a specific implementation, offer a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees. Recent work has shown that split conformal prediction can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focusing on marginal coverage, i.e. on a calibration dataset the method produces on average prediction intervals that contain the ground truth with a predefined coverage level. However, such intervals are often not adaptive, which can be problematic for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise. This paper tries to shed new light on how prediction intervals can be constructed, using methods such as normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction, in such a way that they adapt to the heteroskedasticity of the underlying process. Theoretical and experimental results are presented in which these methods are compared in a systematic way. In particular, it is shown how the conditional validity of a chosen conformal predictor can be related to (implicit) assumptions about the data-generating distribution.
5/1/2024
❗
Cross-Validation Conformal Risk Control
Kfir M. Cohen (Shitz), Sangwoo Park (Shitz), Osvaldo Simeone (Shitz), Shlomo Shamai (Shitz)
0
0
Conformal risk control (CRC) is a recently proposed technique that applies post-hoc to a conventional point predictor to provide calibration guarantees. Generalizing conformal prediction (CP), with CRC, calibration is ensured for a set predictor that is extracted from the point predictor to control a risk function such as the probability of miscoverage or the false negative rate. The original CRC requires the available data set to be split between training and validation data sets. This can be problematic when data availability is limited, resulting in inefficient set predictors. In this paper, a novel CRC method is introduced that is based on cross-validation, rather than on validation as the original CRC. The proposed cross-validation CRC (CV-CRC) extends a version of the jackknife-minmax from CP to CRC, allowing for the control of a broader range of risk functions. CV-CRC is proved to offer theoretical guarantees on the average risk of the set predictor. Furthermore, numerical experiments show that CV-CRC can reduce the average set size with respect to CRC when the available data are limited.
5/2/2024
🔮
Multi-Modal Conformal Prediction Regions with Simple Structures by Optimizing Convex Shape Templates
Renukanandan Tumu, Matthew Cleaveland, Rahul Mangharam, George J. Pappas, Lars Lindemann
0
0
Conformal prediction is a statistical tool for producing prediction regions for machine learning models that are valid with high probability. A key component of conformal prediction algorithms is a emph{non-conformity score function} that quantifies how different a model's prediction is from the unknown ground truth value. Essentially, these functions determine the shape and the size of the conformal prediction regions. While prior work has gone into creating score functions that produce multi-model prediction regions, such regions are generally too complex for use in downstream planning and control problems. We propose a method that optimizes parameterized emph{shape template functions} over calibration data, which results in non-conformity score functions that produce prediction regions with minimum volume. Our approach results in prediction regions that are emph{multi-modal}, so they can properly capture residuals of distributions that have multiple modes, and emph{practical}, so each region is convex and can be easily incorporated into downstream tasks, such as a motion planner using conformal prediction regions. Our method applies to general supervised learning tasks, while we illustrate its use in time-series prediction. We provide a toolbox and present illustrative case studies of F16 fighter jets and autonomous vehicles, showing an up to $68%$ reduction in prediction region area compared to a circular baseline region.
6/26/2024
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024