Conditional validity of heteroskedastic conformal regression
2309.08313
0
0
↗️
Abstract
Conformal prediction, and split conformal prediction as a specific implementation, offer a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees. Recent work has shown that split conformal prediction can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focusing on marginal coverage, i.e. on a calibration dataset the method produces on average prediction intervals that contain the ground truth with a predefined coverage level. However, such intervals are often not adaptive, which can be problematic for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise. This paper tries to shed new light on how prediction intervals can be constructed, using methods such as normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction, in such a way that they adapt to the heteroskedasticity of the underlying process. Theoretical and experimental results are presented in which these methods are compared in a systematic way. In particular, it is shown how the conditional validity of a chosen conformal predictor can be related to (implicit) assumptions about the data-generating distribution.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Conformal prediction is a distribution-free approach to estimating prediction intervals with statistical guarantees.
- Split conformal prediction is a specific implementation that can produce state-of-the-art prediction intervals when focused on marginal coverage.
- However, these intervals are often not adaptive, which can be problematic for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise.
- This paper explores methods like normalized conformal prediction and Mondrian conformal prediction that can adapt to heteroskedasticity.
Plain English Explanation
Conformal prediction is a way to estimate prediction intervals, or a range of possible values, for a given dataset. Unlike traditional statistical methods, conformal prediction doesn't make assumptions about the underlying data distribution. Instead, it uses a "calibration" dataset to determine the appropriate interval size to achieve a desired level of accuracy.
Split conformal prediction is a specific implementation of this approach that has been shown to produce very accurate prediction intervals. However, these intervals may not adapt well to datasets where the amount of noise (variability) in the data changes depending on the input values, a phenomenon known as heteroskedasticity.
This paper explores alternative conformal prediction methods, like normalized conformal prediction and Mondrian conformal prediction, that can better handle heteroskedastic noise. These methods aim to produce prediction intervals that are adaptive, meaning they get wider or narrower depending on the amount of noise in the underlying data.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents theoretical and experimental results comparing different conformal prediction methods for regression problems with heteroskedastic noise. It shows how the "conditional validity" of a conformal predictor, meaning its ability to maintain the desired coverage level, is related to assumptions about the data-generating distribution.
The authors explore normalized conformal prediction and Mondrian conformal prediction as ways to construct adaptive prediction intervals that can better handle heteroskedasticity. Normalized conformal prediction normalizes the prediction residuals, while Mondrian conformal prediction partitions the data in a way that accounts for heterogeneous noise levels.
The paper includes experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets that demonstrate the advantages of these adaptive conformal prediction methods compared to standard split conformal prediction, especially in the presence of heteroskedastic noise. The results highlight the importance of considering the data characteristics when choosing an appropriate conformal prediction approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of conformal prediction methods for heteroskedastic regression problems. However, it is worth noting that the experiments are limited to relatively simple datasets and noise models. Further research would be needed to assess the performance of these techniques on more complex, real-world datasets with more subtle forms of heteroskedasticity.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational complexity or scalability of the proposed methods. In practice, the choice of conformal prediction approach may also depend on factors like training and inference time, especially for large-scale applications.
Researchers have also explored other approaches to improving the adaptivity and conditional validity of conformal predictors, such as training conditional coverage bounds and leveraging learned features. Comparing the strengths and weaknesses of these different techniques could provide further insights.
Conclusion
This paper makes a valuable contribution by exploring the use of normalized and Mondrian conformal prediction to construct adaptive prediction intervals that can better handle heteroskedastic noise. The theoretical and experimental results demonstrate the advantages of these approaches over standard split conformal prediction, particularly in regression problems where the amount of noise varies with the input values.
The findings of this research have implications for a wide range of applications that rely on accurate and reliable prediction intervals, such as risk assessment, decision support systems, and scientific forecasting. By accounting for heteroskedasticity, these adaptive conformal prediction methods can lead to more robust and informative predictions, ultimately improving the quality of decision-making in various domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
0
0
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/17/2024
From Conformal Predictions to Confidence Regions
Charles Guille-Escuret, Eugene Ndiaye
0
0
Conformal prediction methodologies have significantly advanced the quantification of uncertainties in predictive models. Yet, the construction of confidence regions for model parameters presents a notable challenge, often necessitating stringent assumptions regarding data distribution or merely providing asymptotic guarantees. We introduce a novel approach termed CCR, which employs a combination of conformal prediction intervals for the model outputs to establish confidence regions for model parameters. We present coverage guarantees under minimal assumptions on noise and that is valid in finite sample regime. Our approach is applicable to both split conformal predictions and black-box methodologies including full or cross-conformal approaches. In the specific case of linear models, the derived confidence region manifests as the feasible set of a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP), facilitating the deduction of confidence intervals for individual parameters and enabling robust optimization. We empirically compare CCR to recent advancements in challenging settings such as with heteroskedastic and non-Gaussian noise.
5/30/2024
Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution
Drew Prinster, Samuel Stanton, Anqi Liu, Suchi Saria
0
0
As artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.
6/6/2024