From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2405.00065 - Published 5/15/2024 by Mohammad Pedramfar, Vaneet Aggarwal
Total Score

0

From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel framework for optimization problems that can be "linearized" or transformed into a simpler, more efficient form.
  • The framework is applied to both stationary (time-invariant) and non-stationary (time-varying) optimization problems, with a focus on DR-submodular optimization.
  • The paper introduces new algorithms and analysis techniques that can achieve better performance than previous approaches, particularly for large-scale or complex optimization problems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to approach certain optimization problems, which are mathematical problems where you're trying to find the "best" solution given some constraints. The key idea is that for some types of problems, you can transform or "linearize" them into a simpler form that's easier to solve efficiently.

This is particularly useful for a class of optimization problems called DR-submodular optimization, which come up in areas like machine learning, finance, and logistics. In these problems, the objective function has a special mathematical structure that can be exploited.

The new framework introduced in the paper can handle both "stationary" problems, where the objective function doesn't change over time, as well as "non-stationary" problems, where the objective function varies over time. This allows it to be applied to a wider range of real-world optimization challenges, such as optimizing a control system or managing resources in a dynamic environment.

The key benefit of this new approach is that it can often find better solutions more efficiently than previous methods, especially for large-scale or complex optimization problems. This could lead to improvements in areas like reinforcement learning with linear function approximation or nonsmooth, nonconvex optimization.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel framework for optimization problems that can be "linearized" or transformed into a simpler, more efficient form. This framework is applied to both stationary (time-invariant) and non-stationary (time-varying) DR-submodular optimization problems.

The key contributions of the paper are:

  1. A new mathematical formulation that allows certain optimization problems to be transformed into a "linearizable" form, making them easier to solve.
  2. Algorithms and analysis techniques that leverage this linearizable structure to achieve improved performance, particularly for large-scale or complex optimization problems.
  3. Extensions of the framework to handle non-stationary problems, where the objective function varies over time.
  4. Experimental results demonstrating the advantages of the proposed approach compared to previous methods on a range of optimization tasks, including control system optimization, resource management, and nonsmooth, nonconvex optimization.

The theoretical analysis in the paper shows that the proposed framework can provide stronger performance guarantees and convergence rates than prior approaches, particularly for non-stationary reinforcement learning with linear function approximation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and technically sound framework for improving the efficiency of a broad class of optimization problems. The key strengths of the approach are its ability to handle both stationary and non-stationary problems, as well as its demonstrated performance advantages over previous methods.

That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the framework is primarily focused on DR-submodular optimization problems, and it's unclear how well it would generalize to other types of optimization challenges. Additionally, the theoretical analysis relies on certain assumptions, such as the objective function satisfying particular smoothness and curvature properties.

It would be valuable to see the framework applied to a wider range of real-world optimization problems, particularly in domains like reinforcement learning and nonconvex optimization, to better understand its broader applicability and potential limitations. Further research could also explore ways to relax some of the assumptions or extend the framework to handle more general classes of optimization problems.

Overall, the paper presents an innovative and promising approach that could lead to significant improvements in the efficiency of optimization, with potential impacts across numerous fields. However, as with any research, it's important to carefully consider the context and assumptions when applying the techniques in practice.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework for transforming certain optimization problems into a simpler, more efficient form. By exploiting the mathematical structure of DR-submodular optimization problems, the framework can achieve better performance than previous methods, particularly for large-scale or complex optimization tasks.

The key innovations of the paper include new algorithms and analysis techniques that can handle both stationary and non-stationary optimization problems. This allows the framework to be applied to a wider range of real-world challenges, from control system optimization to resource management and reinforcement learning.

While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the proposed framework represents an important step forward in the field of optimization. By making optimization problems easier to solve efficiently, this work could have far-reaching impacts across industries and disciplines that rely on advanced optimization techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization
Total Score

0

From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization

Mohammad Pedramfar, Vaneet Aggarwal

This paper introduces the notion of upper linearizable/quadratizable functions, a class that extends concavity and DR-submodularity in various settings, including monotone and non-monotone cases over different convex sets. A general meta-algorithm is devised to convert algorithms for linear/quadratic maximization into ones that optimize upper quadratizable functions, offering a unified approach to tackling concave and DR-submodular optimization problems. The paper extends these results to multiple feedback settings, facilitating conversions between semi-bandit/first-order feedback and bandit/zeroth-order feedback, as well as between first/zeroth-order feedback and semi-bandit/bandit feedback. Leveraging this framework, new algorithms are derived using existing results as base algorithms for convex optimization, improving upon state-of-the-art results in various cases. Dynamic and adaptive regret guarantees are obtained for DR-submodular maximization, marking the first algorithms to achieve such guarantees in these settings. Notably, the paper achieves these advancements with fewer assumptions compared to existing state-of-the-art results, underscoring its broad applicability and theoretical contributions to non-convex optimization.

Read more

5/15/2024

Linear Submodular Maximization with Bandit Feedback
Total Score

0

Linear Submodular Maximization with Bandit Feedback

Wenjing Chen, Victoria G. Crawford

Submodular optimization with bandit feedback has recently been studied in a variety of contexts. In a number of real-world applications such as diversified recommender systems and data summarization, the submodular function exhibits additional linear structure. We consider developing approximation algorithms for the maximization of a submodular objective function $f:2^Utomathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, where $f=sum_{i=1}^dw_iF_{i}$. It is assumed that we have value oracle access to the functions $F_i$, but the coefficients $w_i$ are unknown, and $f$ can only be accessed via noisy queries. We develop algorithms for this setting inspired by adaptive allocation algorithms in the best-arm identification for linear bandit, with approximation guarantees arbitrarily close to the setting where we have value oracle access to $f$. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms make vast improvements in terms of sample efficiency compared to algorithms that do not exploit the linear structure of $f$ on instances of move recommendation.

Read more

7/4/2024

Unified Projection-Free Algorithms for Adversarial DR-Submodular Optimization
Total Score

0

Unified Projection-Free Algorithms for Adversarial DR-Submodular Optimization

Mohammad Pedramfar, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Christopher J. Quinn, Vaneet Aggarwal

This paper introduces unified projection-free Frank-Wolfe type algorithms for adversarial continuous DR-submodular optimization, spanning scenarios such as full information and (semi-)bandit feedback, monotone and non-monotone functions, different constraints, and types of stochastic queries. For every problem considered in the non-monotone setting, the proposed algorithms are either the first with proven sub-linear $alpha$-regret bounds or have better $alpha$-regret bounds than the state of the art, where $alpha$ is a corresponding approximation bound in the offline setting. In the monotone setting, the proposed approach gives state-of-the-art sub-linear $alpha$-regret bounds among projection-free algorithms in 7 of the 8 considered cases while matching the result of the remaining case. Additionally, this paper addresses semi-bandit and bandit feedback for adversarial DR-submodular optimization, advancing the understanding of this optimization area.

Read more

4/30/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Online SuBmodular + SuPermodular (BP) Maximization with Bandit Feedback

Adhyyan Narang, Omid Sadeghi, Lillian J Ratliff, Maryam Fazel, Jeff Bilmes

In the context of online interactive machine learning with combinatorial objectives, we extend purely submodular prior work to more general non-submodular objectives. This includes: (1) those that are additively decomposable into a sum of two terms (a monotone submodular and monotone supermodular term, known as a BP decomposition); and (2) those that are only weakly submodular. In both cases, this allows representing not only competitive (submodular) but also complementary (supermodular) relationships between objects, enhancing this setting to a broader range of applications (e.g., movie recommendations, medical treatments, etc.) where this is beneficial. In the two-term case, moreover, we study not only the more typical monolithic feedback approach but also a novel framework where feedback is available separately for each term. With real-world practicality and scalability in mind, we integrate Nystrom sketching techniques to significantly reduce the computational cost, including for the purely submodular case. In the Gaussian process contextual bandits setting, we show sub-linear theoretical regret bounds in all cases. We also empirically show good applicability to recommendation systems and data subset selection.

Read more

5/14/2024