From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the emotion annotation capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers examine how well LLMs can identify and label the emotional content in text.
- They assess the performance of LLMs compared to human annotators on emotion annotation tasks.
- The findings provide insights into the potential of LLMs to assist with emotion-based text analysis and annotation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how well large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, can identify and label the emotional content in written text. The researchers compared the performance of these language models to human annotators, who manually categorize the emotions expressed in text.
By understanding the emotion annotation capabilities of language models, the researchers aim to assess their potential for assisting with tasks that require understanding the emotional aspects of text, such as analyzing customer feedback, social media posts, or literary works. If language models can accurately identify emotions in text, they could help streamline and scale up these types of text analysis and annotation efforts.
The findings from this research provide insights into the strengths and limitations of using language models for emotion-based text analysis, which could inform the development of future AI-powered tools for tasks that require understanding the emotional content of written communication.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the emotion annotation performance of several large language models, including BERT, GPT-2, and RoBERTa. They used a dataset of text samples labeled with emotion categories by human annotators as the ground truth.
The language models were fine-tuned on the emotion annotation task and their performance was assessed using standard evaluation metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and Cohen's kappa. The results showed that the language models were generally able to perform well on the emotion annotation task, often approaching or exceeding the performance of the human annotators.
The researchers also analyzed the types of errors made by the language models and found that they tended to struggle more with distinguishing between similar emotional states, such as "joy" and "anticipation." The paper discusses potential reasons for these limitations and suggests ways to further improve the emotion annotation capabilities of LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the emotion annotation capabilities of LLMs, but there are a few potential limitations to consider:
- The dataset used for the experiments may not be representative of all types of text and emotional expressions, so the findings may not generalize to all domains.
- The performance of the language models was assessed on a limited set of emotion categories, and their ability to handle more nuanced or complex emotional states was not explored.
- The paper does not address potential biases or inconsistencies in the human annotations, which could impact the evaluation of the language models.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the potential of LLMs for emotion-based text analysis, it does not fully address the ethical implications of using these systems, such as concerns around privacy, fairness, and transparency.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into the emotion annotation capabilities of large language models, demonstrating their potential to assist with tasks that require understanding the emotional content of text. The findings suggest that LLMs can perform well on emotion annotation, often approaching or exceeding human-level performance.
However, the research also highlights the need for further exploration of the limitations and biases inherent in these systems, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding their use. As the field of AI-powered text analysis continues to evolve, studies like this one can help guide the development of more robust and responsible tools for understanding the emotional dimensions of written communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs
Minxue Niu (University of Michigan), Mimansa Jaiswal (Independent Researcher), Emily Mower Provost (University of Michigan)
Training emotion recognition models has relied heavily on human annotated data, which present diversity, quality, and cost challenges. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT4, in automating or assisting emotion annotation. We compare GPT4 with supervised models and or humans in three aspects: agreement with human annotations, alignment with human perception, and impact on model training. We find that common metrics that use aggregated human annotations as ground truth can underestimate the performance, of GPT-4 and our human evaluation experiment reveals a consistent preference for GPT-4 annotations over humans across multiple datasets and evaluators. Further, we investigate the impact of using GPT-4 as an annotation filtering process to improve model training. Together, our findings highlight the great potential of LLMs in emotion annotation tasks and underscore the need for refined evaluation methodologies.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Can Large Language Models Aid in Annotating Speech Emotional Data? Uncovering New Frontiers
Siddique Latif, Muhammad Usama, Mohammad Ibrahim Malik, Bjorn W. Schuller
Despite recent advancements in speech emotion recognition (SER) models, state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) approaches face the challenge of the limited availability of annotated data. Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionised our understanding of natural language, introducing emergent properties that broaden comprehension in language, speech, and vision. This paper examines the potential of LLMs to annotate abundant speech data, aiming to enhance the state-of-the-art in SER. We evaluate this capability across various settings using publicly available speech emotion classification datasets. Leveraging ChatGPT, we experimentally demonstrate the promising role of LLMs in speech emotion data annotation. Our evaluation encompasses single-shot and few-shots scenarios, revealing performance variability in SER. Notably, we achieve improved results through data augmentation, incorporating ChatGPT-annotated samples into existing datasets. Our work uncovers new frontiers in speech emotion classification, highlighting the increasing significance of LLMs in this field moving forward.
Read more6/21/2024
0
The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.
Read more5/3/2024
💬
0
From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management
Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu
This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.
Read more8/13/2024