Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies
2404.04101
0
0
Abstract
Propelled by their remarkable capabilities to generate novel and engaging content, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies are disrupting traditional workflows in many industries. While prior research has examined GenAI from a techno-centric perspective, there is still a lack of understanding about how users perceive and utilize GenAI in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with (N=18) GenAI users in creative industries, investigating the human-GenAI co-creation process within a holistic LUA (Learning, Using and Assessing) framework. Our study uncovered an intriguingly complex landscape: Prospects-GenAI greatly fosters the co-creation between human expertise and GenAI capabilities, profoundly transforming creative workflows; Challenges-Meanwhile, users face substantial uncertainties and complexities arising from resource availability, tool usability, and regulatory compliance; Strategies-In response, users actively devise various strategies to overcome many of such challenges. Our study reveals key implications for the design of future GenAI tools.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the prospects, challenges, and strategies for generative AI in real-world (or "wild") applications.
- It examines the current state of generative AI, the potential benefits and risks, and the key considerations for deploying these systems in practical settings.
- The paper covers topics such as human-AI collaboration, transparency, and user agency, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of generative AI.
Plain English Explanation
Generative AI refers to a type of artificial intelligence that can create new content, such as text, images, or audio, rather than just analyzing existing information. This paper looks at how generative AI can be used in real-world situations, beyond just research labs and controlled experiments.
The authors discuss the potential advantages of generative AI, such as automating creative tasks or enhancing human capabilities. However, they also highlight the challenges, including concerns about transparency and ensuring that users maintain control and agency when working with these systems.
The paper suggests strategies for addressing these challenges, such as designing generative AI systems that are more interpretable and aligned with human values. It also explores the implications of generative AI for fields like architectural design.
Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive look at the current state of generative AI and the key considerations for its real-world deployment, with the goal of helping researchers, developers, and users navigate this rapidly evolving landscape.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of generative AI and its potential applications in the "wild" – that is, in real-world settings beyond controlled research environments. The authors highlight the key aspects of generative AI, including its ability to create novel content and its potential impact on human-AI collaboration.
The paper then reviews the relevant literature on topics such as human-AI interaction, transparency, and user agency. This provides a foundation for understanding the challenges and considerations that arise when deploying generative AI systems in real-world settings.
The authors then delve deeper into the prospects, challenges, and strategies for generative AI in the wild. They discuss the potential benefits of these systems, such as automating creative tasks and enhancing human capabilities. However, they also highlight the need for transparency and user agency to address concerns about the safety and ethical implications of generative AI.
The paper also explores the implications of generative AI for specific domains, such as architectural design. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the current research and identify key areas for future exploration.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-researched analysis of the prospects, challenges, and strategies for generative AI in the wild. The authors have done an excellent job of synthesizing the relevant literature and identifying the critical issues that need to be addressed.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the challenges and concerns associated with generative AI, without delving too deeply into specific solutions or case studies. While the authors do propose some strategies, such as designing more interpretable and value-aligned systems, more concrete examples or pilot projects could have strengthened the practical relevance of the paper.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the broader societal implications of generative AI, beyond just the technical and user-centric considerations. For example, the potential impact on industries, jobs, and creative expression could have been discussed in more depth.
Nevertheless, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the current state of generative AI and the key factors that must be considered when deploying these systems in real-world settings. It encourages readers to think critically about the potential benefits and risks, and to actively engage in shaping the future of this rapidly evolving technology.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive examination of the prospects, challenges, and strategies for generative AI in the wild. It highlights the potential benefits of these systems, such as automating creative tasks and enhancing human capabilities, while also emphasizing the need for transparency, user agency, and ethical considerations.
The authors have provided a thorough review of the relevant literature and have identified key areas for further research and development. By addressing the critical issues surrounding the deployment of generative AI in real-world settings, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers, developers, and users who are interested in navigating the complex landscape of this rapidly advancing technology.
As generative AI continues to evolve, the insights and strategies presented in this paper will be crucial for ensuring that these systems are designed and deployed in a way that aligns with human values and priorities, while also unlocking their full potential to transform and enrich our lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies
Yuan Sun, Qiurong Song, Xinning Gui, Fenglong Ma, Ting Wang
0
0
Automated machine learning (AutoML) is envisioned to make ML techniques accessible to ordinary users. Recent work has investigated the role of humans in enhancing AutoML functionality throughout a standard ML workflow. However, it is also critical to understand how users adopt existing AutoML solutions in complex, real-world settings from a holistic perspective. To fill this gap, this study conducted semi-structured interviews of AutoML users (N=19) focusing on understanding (1) the limitations of AutoML encountered by users in their real-world practices, (2) the strategies users adopt to cope with such limitations, and (3) how the limitations and workarounds impact their use of AutoML. Our findings reveal that users actively exercise user agency to overcome three major challenges arising from customizability, transparency, and privacy. Furthermore, users make cautious decisions about whether and how to apply AutoML on a case-by-case basis. Finally, we derive design implications for developing future AutoML solutions.
4/5/2024
🤖
The collective use and evaluation of generative AI tools in digital humanities research: Survey-based results
Meredith Dedema, Rongqian Ma
0
0
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies has revolutionized research, with significant implications for Digital Humanities (DH), a field inherently intertwined with technological progress. This article investigates how digital humanities scholars adopt, practice, as well as critically evaluate, GenAI technologies such as ChatGPT in the research process. Drawing on 76 responses collected from an international survey study, we explored digital humanities scholars' rationale for GenAI adoption in research, identified specific use cases and practices of using GenAI to support various DH research tasks, and analyzed scholars' collective perceptions of GenAI's benefits, risks, and impact on DH research. The survey results suggest that DH research communities hold divisive sentiments towards the value of GenAI in DH scholarship, whereas the actual usage diversifies among individuals and across research tasks. Our survey-based analysis has the potential to serve as a basis for further empirical research on the impact of GenAI on the evolution of DH scholarship.
4/22/2024
📉
Automating Creativity
Ming-Hui Huang, Roland T. Rust
0
0
Generative AI (GenAI) has spurred the expectation of being creative, due to its ability to generate content, yet so far, its creativity has somewhat disappointed, because it is trained using existing data following human intentions to generate outputs. The purpose of this paper is to explore what is required to evolve AI from generative to creative. Based on a reinforcement learning approach and building upon various research streams of computational creativity, we develop a triple prompt-response-reward engineering framework to develop the creative capability of GenAI. This framework consists of three components: 1) a prompt model for expected creativity by developing discriminative prompts that are objectively, individually, or socially novel, 2) a response model for observed creativity by generating surprising outputs that are incrementally, disruptively, or radically innovative, and 3) a reward model for improving creativity over time by incorporating feedback from the AI, the creator/manager, and/or the customers. This framework enables the application of GenAI for various levels of creativity strategically.
5/14/2024
👀
Student Reflections on Self-Initiated GenAI Use in HCI Education
Hauke Sandhaus, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju
0
0
This study explores students' self-initiated use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in an interactive systems design class. Through 12 group interviews, students revealed the dual nature of GenAI in (1) stimulating creativity and (2) speeding up design iterations, alongside concerns over its potential to cause shallow learning and reliance. GenAI's benefits were pronounced in the execution phase of design, aiding rapid prototyping and ideation, while its use in initial insight generation posed risks to depth and reflective practice. This reflection highlights the complex role of GenAI in Human-Computer Interaction education, emphasizing the need for balanced integration to leverage its advantages without compromising fundamental learning outcomes.
5/3/2024