Game Theory in Distributed Systems Security: Foundations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Read original: arXiv:2309.01281 - Published 5/29/2024 by Mustafa Abdallah, Saurabh Bagchi, Shaunak D. Bopardikar, Kevin Chan, Xing Gao, Murat Kantarcioglu, Congmiao Li, Peng Liu, Quanyan Zhu
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the growing security challenges facing critical infrastructure and personal computing systems due to their distributed architecture and increasing interconnectedness.
  • The authors argue that rigorous reasoning from the fields of distributed system security and game theory is needed to effectively address these challenges.
  • The paper outlines research challenges in three categories - analytical, systems, and integration - with both short-term (2-3 years) and long-term (5-10 years) goals.
  • The paper was developed through a community discussion at the 2022 NSF SaTC PI meeting.

Plain English Explanation

Many of the essential systems we rely on, from power grids to home computers, are built using distributed computing architectures. As these systems become more interconnected, the potential for attacks against them is growing rapidly. The authors of this paper believe it's time to bring together expertise from the fields of distributed system security and game theory to develop rigorous solutions to secure these systems.

The paper lays out a roadmap of research challenges that need to be tackled. In the short-term (2-3 years), the focus should be on developing better analytical models to understand the security risks, as well as practical systems-level changes to improve security. Over the longer-term (5-10 years), the goal is to integrate these analytical and systems-level approaches into a cohesive framework that can be widely deployed to protect our critical and personal computing infrastructure.

By combining the insights from these two technical communities, the authors hope to make significant strides in securing our increasingly interconnected world, where the incentives and opportunities for attacks are growing every day. This collaborative effort aims to get ahead of the curve and develop robust security solutions before the threats become even more severe.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the distributed nature of many critical infrastructure systems, such as power grids, and personal computing systems, and how this distributed architecture increases their attack surface and makes them attractive targets for malicious actors. The authors argue that the growing incentives to attack these systems, coupled with their heightened vulnerability due to rising interconnectivity, necessitates a rigorous, multi-disciplinary approach to securing them.

The researchers propose bringing together expertise from the distributed system security and game theory technical communities to develop effective security solutions. They outline a set of research challenges organized into three key categories:

  1. Analytical Challenges:

    • Short-term (2-3 years): Developing novel game-theoretic models to analyze the security dynamics of distributed systems, building on work like Security Allocation in Networked Control Systems Under Stealthy Attacks.
    • Long-term (5-10 years): Extending these analytical models to capture the complexity of real-world distributed systems and their evolving attack surfaces.
  2. Systems Challenges:

  3. Integration Challenges:

    • Short-term (2-3 years): Bridging the gap between analytical models and practical system designs, ensuring the former can meaningfully inform the latter.
    • Long-term (5-10 years): Creating a comprehensive security framework that seamlessly integrates analytical, systems-level, and other relevant approaches to provide end-to-end protection for distributed systems.

The paper was conceived through a community discussion at the 2022 NSF SaTC PI meeting, bringing together researchers from both the distributed system security and game theory disciplines to collectively define this research agenda.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the need to combine expertise from distributed system security and game theory to address the growing security challenges faced by critical infrastructure and personal computing systems. The authors have done a good job of outlining a clear and comprehensive research agenda, covering both short-term and long-term goals across analytical, systems, and integration challenges.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve into the specifics of how this collaboration between the two technical communities might be facilitated or what the practical barriers to such cross-disciplinary work might be. The authors could have explored strategies for fostering stronger connections and knowledge sharing between these fields, as well as potential funding or institutional hurdles that might need to be overcome.

Additionally, while the paper highlights the need for more rigorous analytical models and practical security mechanisms, it does not provide much detail on the current state of the art in these areas or how the proposed research builds upon existing work. Connecting the research agenda more explicitly to the latest advances and limitations in the field could have strengthened the paper's narrative and justification for the proposed directions.

Overall, the paper sets forth a compelling vision for addressing a critical challenge, and the research community would benefit from further developing and refining the ideas presented here. Encouraging readers to think critically about the feasibility, potential impact, and potential pitfalls of this agenda will be important for guiding the field in a productive direction.

Conclusion

This paper argues that the time has come to bring together expertise from the distributed system security and game theory technical communities to develop rigorous solutions for securing our critical infrastructure and personal computing systems. As these systems become increasingly interconnected, the attack surface and incentives for malicious actors are growing rapidly, necessitating a concerted, multi-disciplinary effort.

The authors outline a comprehensive research agenda spanning analytical, systems, and integration challenges, with both short-term and long-term goals. By advancing our understanding of the security dynamics of distributed systems through game-theoretic modeling, designing practical security mechanisms, and integrating these analytical and systems-level approaches, the research community can make significant strides in protecting the essential services and technologies we all rely on.

Tackling this challenge will require close collaboration between these two technical communities, as well as sustained funding and institutional support. However, the potential impact of developing robust, scalable security solutions for our increasingly interconnected world is immense. This paper lays the foundation for a critical research endeavor that could have far-reaching implications for the security and resilience of our digital infrastructure.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Game Theory in Distributed Systems Security: Foundations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Mustafa Abdallah, Saurabh Bagchi, Shaunak D. Bopardikar, Kevin Chan, Xing Gao, Murat Kantarcioglu, Congmiao Li, Peng Liu, Quanyan Zhu

Many of our critical infrastructure systems and personal computing systems have a distributed computing systems structure. The incentives to attack them have been growing rapidly as has their attack surface due to increasing levels of connectedness. Therefore, we feel it is time to bring in rigorous reasoning to secure such systems. The distributed system security and the game theory technical communities can come together to effectively address this challenge. In this article, we lay out the foundations from each that we can build upon to achieve our goals. Next, we describe a set of research challenges for the community, organized into three categories -- analytical, systems, and integration challenges, each with short term time horizon (2-3 years) and long term (5-10 years) items. This article was conceived of through a community discussion at the 2022 NSF SaTC PI meeting.

Read more

5/29/2024

A Comprehensive Survey on the Security of Smart Grid: Challenges, Mitigations, and Future Research Opportunities
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey on the Security of Smart Grid: Challenges, Mitigations, and Future Research Opportunities

Arastoo Zibaeirad, Farnoosh Koleini, Shengping Bi, Tao Hou, Tao Wang

In this study, we conduct a comprehensive review of smart grid security, exploring system architectures, attack methodologies, defense strategies, and future research opportunities. We provide an in-depth analysis of various attack vectors, focusing on new attack surfaces introduced by advanced components in smart grids. The review particularly includes an extensive analysis of coordinated attacks that incorporate multiple attack strategies and exploit vulnerabilities across various smart grid components to increase their adverse impact, demonstrating the complexity and potential severity of these threats. Following this, we examine innovative detection and mitigation strategies, including game theory, graph theory, blockchain, and machine learning, discussing their advancements in counteracting evolving threats and associated research challenges. In particular, our review covers a thorough examination of widely used machine learning-based mitigation strategies, analyzing their applications and research challenges spanning across supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, ensemble, and reinforcement learning. Further, we outline future research directions and explore new techniques and concerns. We first discuss the research opportunities for existing and emerging strategies, and then explore the potential role of new techniques, such as large language models (LLMs), and the emerging threat of adversarial machine learning in the future of smart grid security.

Read more

7/12/2024

Cyber Physical Games
Total Score

0

Cyber Physical Games

Warisa Sritriratanarak, Paulo Garcia

We describe a formulation of multi-agents operating within a Cyber-Physical System, resulting in collaborative or adversarial games. We show that the non-determinism inherent in the communication medium between agents and the underlying physical environment gives rise to environment evolution that is a probabilistic function of agents' strategies. We name these emergent properties Cyber Physical Games and study its properties. We present an algorithmic model that determines the most likely system evolution, approximating Cyber Physical Games through Probabilistic Finite State Automata, and evaluate it on collaborative and adversarial versions of the Iterated Boolean Game, comparing theoretical results with simulated ones. Results support the validity of the proposed model, and suggest several required research directions to continue evolving our understanding of Cyber Physical System, as well as how to best design agents that must operate within such environments.

Read more

7/9/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Automated Security Response through Online Learning with Adaptive Conjectures

Kim Hammar, Tao Li, Rolf Stadler, Quanyan Zhu

We study automated security response for an IT infrastructure and formulate the interaction between an attacker and a defender as a partially observed, non-stationary game. We relax the standard assumption that the game model is correctly specified and consider that each player has a probabilistic conjecture about the model, which may be misspecified in the sense that the true model has probability 0. This formulation allows us to capture uncertainty about the infrastructure and the intents of the players. To learn effective game strategies online, we design a novel method where a player iteratively adapts its conjecture using Bayesian learning and updates its strategy through rollout. We prove that the conjectures converge to best fits, and we provide a bound on the performance improvement that rollout enables with a conjectured model. To characterize the steady state of the game, we propose a variant of the Berk-Nash equilibrium. We present our method through an advanced persistent threat use case. Testbed evaluations show that our method produces effective security strategies that adapt to a changing environment. We also find that our method enables faster convergence than current reinforcement learning techniques.

Read more

7/24/2024