GemNet: Menu-Based, Strategy-Proof Multi-Bidder Auctions Through Deep Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces GemNet, a deep learning-based approach for designing strategy-proof multi-bidder auctions.
- The key innovation is the use of a menu-based auction mechanism that allows bidders to submit complex bids, while ensuring the auction remains strategy-proof.
- GemNet uses a neural network to learn an optimal menu design from data, making it applicable to a wide range of auction settings.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of online marketplaces and e-commerce, auctions are a common way for sellers to find the highest-paying buyers for their products or services. Strategy-proof auctions are a specific type of auction where bidders have an incentive to truthfully reveal their maximum willingness to pay, rather than trying to game the system.
The authors of this paper propose a new auction design called GemNet that aims to make multi-bidder auctions strategy-proof. The key idea is to give bidders a "menu" of different bidding options, each with its own set of rules and potential payouts. By carefully designing this menu, the auction can ensure that the best strategy for each bidder is to truthfully bid their maximum value.
To create this menu, the researchers use a deep learning approach. They train a neural network, called GemNet, to learn the optimal menu design from past auction data. This allows the auction mechanism to be tailored to the specific characteristics of the market and the goods being sold, making it more flexible and effective than traditional auction designs.
Compared to other AI-powered auction designs, GemNet has the advantage of being strategy-proof, meaning bidders can't gain an advantage by trying to outsmart the system. This can lead to more efficient and fair outcomes for both buyers and sellers.
Technical Explanation
The core of the GemNet approach is a neural network that takes as input the characteristics of the auction setting (e.g., number of bidders, item being sold) and outputs a menu of bidding options. Each option on the menu specifies a different bidding rule and corresponding payment scheme.
The menu design is optimized to ensure that the dominant strategy for each bidder is to truthfully reveal their maximum willingness to pay. This is achieved by carefully crafting the menu options to align the bidders' incentives with the auctioneer's goal of maximizing revenue.
To train the GemNet model, the authors use a dataset of past auction transactions. They formulate the menu design as an optimization problem, where the goal is to learn a menu that maximizes the auctioneer's revenue while preserving strategy-proofness. This optimization is carried out using gradient-based methods and neural network training techniques.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GemNet through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world auction datasets. They show that GemNet can outperform traditional auction designs, such as the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism, in terms of revenue generation and computational efficiency.
Compared to other AI-powered auction design approaches, GemNet's unique contribution is its ability to learn strategy-proof menu-based auctions directly from data, without requiring complex mathematical modeling or game-theoretic analysis.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. First, the current implementation of GemNet assumes that bidders have independent private values, which may not always be the case in real-world auctions. Extending the model to handle more complex value structures, such as common values or interdependent values, would be an important next step.
Additionally, the authors note that the computational complexity of the GemNet optimization problem grows with the number of bidders and the dimensionality of the bidding space. Developing more efficient optimization techniques or alternative neural network architectures could help scale GemNet to larger auction settings.
Another potential concern is the reliance on historical auction data for training the GemNet model. If the underlying market conditions or bidder behavior changes over time, the learned menu design may become suboptimal. Exploring methods for online or continual learning of the menu design could help address this issue.
Despite these limitations, the GemNet approach represents a significant advance in the field of AI-powered auction design and reinforcement learning for auction optimization. The ability to learn strategy-proof auction mechanisms directly from data is a valuable contribution that could have wide-ranging implications for the design of efficient and fair marketplaces.
Conclusion
The GemNet paper introduces a novel deep learning-based approach for designing strategy-proof multi-bidder auctions. By learning an optimal menu of bidding options, GemNet can ensure that bidders have an incentive to truthfully reveal their maximum willingness to pay, leading to more efficient auction outcomes.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GemNet through theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, showing its potential to outperform traditional auction designs. While there are some limitations that warrant further research, the GemNet approach represents an important step forward in the field of AI-powered auction design, with the potential to unlock new opportunities for fair and efficient online marketplaces.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
GemNet: Menu-Based, Strategy-Proof Multi-Bidder Auctions Through Deep Learning
Tonghan Wang, Yanchen Jiang, David C. Parkes
Differentiable economics uses deep learning for automated mechanism design. Despite strong progress, it has remained an open problem to learn multi-bidder, general, and fully strategy-proof (SP) auctions. We introduce GEneral Menu-based NETwork (GemNet), which significantly extends the menu-based approach of RochetNet [Dutting et al., 2023] to the multi-bidder setting. The challenge in achieving SP is to learn bidder-independent menus that are feasible, so that the optimal menu choices for each bidder do not over-allocate items when taken together (we call this menu compatibility). GemNet penalizes the failure of menu compatibility during training, and transforms learned menus after training through price changes, by considering a set of discretized bidder values and reasoning about Lipschitz smoothness to guarantee menu compatibility on the entire value space. This approach is general, leaving undisturbed trained menus that already satisfy menu compatibility and reducing to RochetNet for a single bidder. Mixed-integer linear programs are used for menu transforms and through a number of optimizations, including adaptive grids and methods to skip menu elements, we scale to large auction design problems. GemNet learns auctions with better revenue than affine maximization methods, achieves exact SP whereas previous general multi-bidder methods are approximately SP, and offers greatly enhanced interpretability.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Strategy-Proof Auctions through Conformal Prediction
Roy Maor Lotan, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Yaniv Romano
Auctions are key for maximizing sellers' revenue and ensuring truthful bidding among buyers. Recently, an approach known as differentiable economics based on deep learning shows promise in learning optimal auction mechanisms for multiple items and participants. However, this approach has no guarantee of strategy-proofness at test time. Strategy-proofness is crucial as it ensures that buyers are incentivized to bid their true valuations, leading to optimal and fair auction outcomes without the risk of manipulation. Building on conformal prediction, we introduce a novel approach to achieve strategy-proofness with rigorous statistical guarantees. The key novelties of our method are: (i) the formulation of a regret prediction model, used to quantify at test time violations of strategy-proofness; and (ii) an auction acceptance rule that leverages the predicted regret to ensure that for a new auction, the data-driven mechanism meets the strategy-proofness requirement with high probability (e.g., 99%). Numerical experiments demonstrate the necessity for rigorous guarantees, the validity of our theoretical results, and the applicability of our proposed method.
Read more7/9/2024
🤖
0
Learning in Repeated Multi-Unit Pay-As-Bid Auctions
Rigel Galgana, Negin Golrezaei
Motivated by Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes, Treasury Auctions, and Procurement Auctions, which all involve the auctioning of homogeneous multiple units, we consider the problem of learning how to bid in repeated multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions. In each of these auctions, a large number of (identical) items are to be allocated to the largest submitted bids, where the price of each of the winning bids is equal to the bid itself. The problem of learning how to bid in pay-as-bid auctions is challenging due to the combinatorial nature of the action space. We overcome this challenge by focusing on the offline setting, where the bidder optimizes their vector of bids while only having access to the past submitted bids by other bidders. We show that the optimal solution to the offline problem can be obtained using a polynomial time dynamic programming (DP) scheme. We leverage the structure of the DP scheme to design online learning algorithms with polynomial time and space complexity under full information and bandit feedback settings. We achieve an upper bound on regret of $O(Msqrt{Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$ and $O(Msqrt{|mathcal{B}|Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$ respectively, where $M$ is the number of units demanded by the bidder, $T$ is the total number of auctions, and $|mathcal{B}|$ is the size of the discretized bid space. We accompany these results with a regret lower bound, which match the linear dependency in $M$. Our numerical results suggest that when all agents behave according to our proposed no regret learning algorithms, the resulting market dynamics mainly converge to a welfare maximizing equilibrium where bidders submit uniform bids. Lastly, our experiments demonstrate that the pay-as-bid auction consistently generates significantly higher revenue compared to its popular alternative, the uniform price auction.
Read more7/17/2024
💬
0
Strategically-Robust Learning Algorithms for Bidding in First-Price Auctions
Rachitesh Kumar, Jon Schneider, Balasubramanian Sivan
Learning to bid in repeated first-price auctions is a fundamental problem at the interface of game theory and machine learning, which has seen a recent surge in interest due to the transition of display advertising to first-price auctions. In this work, we propose a novel concave formulation for pure-strategy bidding in first-price auctions, and use it to analyze natural Gradient-Ascent-based algorithms for this problem. Importantly, our analysis goes beyond regret, which was the typical focus of past work, and also accounts for the strategic backdrop of online-advertising markets where bidding algorithms are deployed -- we provide the first guarantees of strategic-robustness and incentive-compatibility for Gradient Ascent. Concretely, we show that our algorithms achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret when the highest competing bids are generated adversarially, and show that no online algorithm can do better. We further prove that the regret reduces to $O(log T)$ when the competition is stationary and stochastic, which drastically improves upon the previous best of $O(sqrt{T})$. Moving beyond regret, we show that a strategic seller cannot exploit our algorithms to extract more revenue on average than is possible under the optimal mechanism. Finally, we prove that our algorithm is also incentive compatible -- it is a (nearly) dominant strategy for the buyer to report her values truthfully to the algorithm as a whole. Altogether, these guarantees make our algorithms the first to simultaneously achieve both optimal regret and strategic-robustness.
Read more7/9/2024