A General Framework for Learning from Weak Supervision
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a template for citing AI research papers in a standardized "PRIME AI Style" format.
- The template provides a structured way to cite key information like the authors, title, page numbers, and DOI.
- The paper was generated using LaTeXML, a tool for automatically generating HTML from LaTeX documents.
Plain English Explanation
This paper is essentially a template or example for how to properly cite and reference an AI research paper. When you read an academic paper, it's important to be able to easily identify the key details like who wrote it, what it's titled, how many pages it is, and where you can find the original online.
The authors of this paper have created a standardized "PRIME AI Style" format that lays out exactly how to format these citations. By following this template, readers can quickly and easily get the essential information they need about a paper, making it simpler to find and reference the original work.
The paper itself was generated using a tool called LaTeXML, which can automatically convert documents written in the LaTeX markup language into clean, formatted HTML. So this example paper serves as a model for how AI research should be presented and cited going forward.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a template for formatting PRIME AI Style citations, which include the following key elements:
The template is presented in an HTML document generated using LaTeXML, a tool for converting LaTeX source code into various output formats including HTML. The HTML page includes standard web elements like a <head> section with metadata, and a <body> section containing the citation template.
The paper also includes links to relevant CSS stylesheets and JavaScript libraries to style and add interactivity to the citation format, such as Bootstrap for responsive design and HTML2Canvas for capturing screenshots.
Overall, this work establishes a clear standard for how to properly cite and reference AI research papers, making it easier for readers to discover and engage with the original sources.
Critical Analysis
The PRIME AI Style citation format proposed in this paper is a useful step towards standardizing how AI research is presented and shared. By providing a clear, structured template, the authors make it simpler for readers to quickly identify the key details of a given paper.
However, the template is quite basic and doesn't include some potentially useful information, such as the publication date, dataset or software used, or a brief abstract summarizing the paper's content and findings. Expanding the template to capture these additional details could make it even more valuable for researchers and readers.
Additionally, while the use of LaTeXML to generate the HTML is a clever approach, it may limit the accessibility and usability of the template for researchers who are less familiar with LaTeX. Providing alternative export options, such as a simple plain text or Markdown format, could make the template more widely adoptable.
Overall, this paper presents a solid starting point for standardizing AI citation formats. With some additional refinements and flexibility, the PRIME AI Style template could become a widely-used convention in the field.
Conclusion
This paper establishes a template for citing AI research papers in a consistent, structured "PRIME AI Style" format. By clearly specifying the key elements to include, such as author names, title, page numbers, and DOI, the template makes it easier for readers to quickly identify and access the original sources.
The use of LaTeXML to generate the HTML version of the template is an innovative approach, but could limit its accessibility for some researchers. Expanding the template to capture additional metadata and offering alternative export options could help make the PRIME AI Style citation format more widely adopted across the AI research community.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards improving the discoverability and transparency of AI research. By standardizing how papers are cited, it can foster greater collaboration and build upon existing knowledge in the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
A General Framework for Learning from Weak Supervision
Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, Lei Feng, Xiang Li, Yidong Wang, Xing Xie, Masashi Sugiyama, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj
Weakly supervised learning generally faces challenges in applicability to various scenarios with diverse weak supervision and in scalability due to the complexity of existing algorithms, thereby hindering the practical deployment. This paper introduces a general framework for learning from weak supervision (GLWS) with a novel algorithm. Central to GLWS is an Expectation-Maximization (EM) formulation, adeptly accommodating various weak supervision sources, including instance partial labels, aggregate statistics, pairwise observations, and unlabeled data. We further present an advanced algorithm that significantly simplifies the EM computational demands using a Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (NFA) along with a forward-backward algorithm, which effectively reduces time complexity from quadratic or factorial often required in existing solutions to linear scale. The problem of learning from arbitrary weak supervision is therefore converted to the NFA modeling of them. GLWS not only enhances the scalability of machine learning models but also demonstrates superior performance and versatility across 11 weak supervision scenarios. We hope our work paves the way for further advancements and practical deployment in this field.
Read more6/6/2024
🤯
0
A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization
Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun
Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment
Yue Guo, Yi Yang
Large language models (LLMs) are now rapidly advancing and surpassing human abilities on many natural language tasks. However, aligning these super-human LLMs with human knowledge remains challenging because the supervision signals from human annotators may be wrong. This issue, known as the super-alignment problem, requires enhancing weak-to-strong generalization, where a strong LLM must generalize from imperfect supervision provided by a weaker source. To address this issue, we propose an approach to improve weak-to-strong generalization by involving the reliability of weak supervision signals in the alignment process. In our method, we query the weak supervisor for multiple answers, estimate the answer reliability, and enhance the alignment process by filtering out uncertain data or re-weighting reliable data. Experiments on four datasets demonstrate that our methods effectively identify the quality of weak labels and significantly enhance weak-to-strong generalization. Our work presents effective techniques for error-robust model alignment, reducing error propagation from noisy supervision and enhancing the accuracy and reliability of LLMs. Codes are publicly available at http://github.com/Irenehere/ReliableAlignment.
Read more6/28/2024
📉
0
Convergence Behavior of an Adversarial Weak Supervision Method
Steven An (University of California, San Diego), Sanjoy Dasgupta (University of California, San Diego)
Labeling data via rules-of-thumb and minimal label supervision is central to Weak Supervision, a paradigm subsuming subareas of machine learning such as crowdsourced learning and semi-supervised ensemble learning. By using this labeled data to train modern machine learning methods, the cost of acquiring large amounts of hand labeled data can be ameliorated. Approaches to combining the rules-of-thumb falls into two camps, reflecting different ideologies of statistical estimation. The most common approach, exemplified by the Dawid-Skene model, is based on probabilistic modeling. The other, developed in the work of Balsubramani-Freund and others, is adversarial and game-theoretic. We provide a variety of statistical results for the adversarial approach under log-loss: we characterize the form of the solution, relate it to logistic regression, demonstrate consistency, and give rates of convergence. On the other hand, we find that probabilistic approaches for the same model class can fail to be consistent. Experimental results are provided to corroborate the theoretical results.
Read more5/28/2024