Convergence Behavior of an Adversarial Weak Supervision Method

Read original: arXiv:2405.16013 - Published 5/28/2024 by Steven An (University of California, San Diego), Sanjoy Dasgupta (University of California, San Diego)
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the convergence behavior of an adversarial weak supervision method.
  • The method aims to train a model using limited and potentially noisy data by leveraging adversarial techniques.
  • The authors analyze the theoretical properties of the method, including its convergence guarantees and the effect of different hyperparameters.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, we often face situations where we have limited or imperfect training data. This can make it challenging to train high-performing models. One approach to address this is weak supervision, where we use noisy or incomplete labels to train the model. However, this can be tricky, as the noisy labels can negatively impact the model's performance.

This paper explores an adversarial weak supervision method, which uses adversarial techniques to help the model learn from the limited and potentially noisy data. The key idea is to train the model to be robust to the noise in the labels, by introducing an adversary that tries to find the worst-case label noise. The authors analyze the theoretical properties of this approach, including how it behaves as the training progresses and how different hyperparameters affect its performance.

The findings from this research could be valuable for developing more robust machine learning models in scenarios with limited or imperfect data, such as event identification or semi-supervised learning. Additionally, the insights into the theoretical aspects of weak-to-strong generalization could contribute to our understanding of the fundamental limits of machine learning in the presence of label noise.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an adversarial weak supervision method, where the goal is to train a model using limited and potentially noisy data. The authors formulate the problem as a min-max optimization task, where the model tries to minimize the loss on the training data, while an adversary tries to find the worst-case label noise to maximize the loss.

The key components of the method are:

  1. Adversarial Label Noise Generation: The adversary generates label noise by solving an optimization problem to find the worst-case perturbations to the true labels.
  2. Model Training: The model is trained to be robust to the adversarial label noise, by minimizing the loss on the noisy labels.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of this method, showing that it is guaranteed to converge under certain conditions. They also investigate the impact of different hyperparameters, such as the strength of the adversary and the noise level, on the method's performance.

The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the adversarial weak supervision approach on various benchmark datasets, where it outperforms other weak supervision techniques, especially in the presence of high levels of label noise.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the adversarial weak supervision method, which is a promising approach for training models with limited and noisy data. The authors have carefully considered the potential limitations and caveats of their method, such as the assumptions required for the convergence guarantees and the sensitivity to hyperparameter choices.

One potential area for further research could be investigating the robustness of the method to different types of label noise, beyond the worst-case adversarial noise considered in this paper. It would also be interesting to explore the method's performance on more diverse real-world datasets with complex, non-i.i.d. noise patterns.

Additionally, while the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and empirical validation of the method, it would be valuable to see more discussion on the practical implications and potential use cases of this approach, such as its applicability to specific problem domains or its integration with other machine learning techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel adversarial weak supervision method that aims to train models using limited and noisy data. The authors provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the method's convergence properties and the impact of different hyperparameters. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, particularly in the presence of high levels of label noise.

The insights from this research contribute to our understanding of robust machine learning techniques and the fundamental limits of weak-to-strong generalization in the presence of imperfect data. The proposed adversarial weak supervision method could have practical applications in a wide range of domains, such as event identification or semi-supervised learning, where limited or noisy data is a common challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Convergence Behavior of an Adversarial Weak Supervision Method

Steven An (University of California, San Diego), Sanjoy Dasgupta (University of California, San Diego)

Labeling data via rules-of-thumb and minimal label supervision is central to Weak Supervision, a paradigm subsuming subareas of machine learning such as crowdsourced learning and semi-supervised ensemble learning. By using this labeled data to train modern machine learning methods, the cost of acquiring large amounts of hand labeled data can be ameliorated. Approaches to combining the rules-of-thumb falls into two camps, reflecting different ideologies of statistical estimation. The most common approach, exemplified by the Dawid-Skene model, is based on probabilistic modeling. The other, developed in the work of Balsubramani-Freund and others, is adversarial and game-theoretic. We provide a variety of statistical results for the adversarial approach under log-loss: we characterize the form of the solution, relate it to logistic regression, demonstrate consistency, and give rates of convergence. On the other hand, we find that probabilistic approaches for the same model class can fail to be consistent. Experimental results are provided to corroborate the theoretical results.

Read more

5/28/2024

Uniform Convergence of Adversarially Robust Classifiers
Total Score

0

Uniform Convergence of Adversarially Robust Classifiers

Rachel Morris, Ryan Murray

In recent years there has been significant interest in the effect of different types of adversarial perturbations in data classification problems. Many of these models incorporate the adversarial power, which is an important parameter with an associated trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This work considers a general framework for adversarially-perturbed classification problems, in a large data or population-level limit. In such a regime, we demonstrate that as adversarial strength goes to zero that optimal classifiers converge to the Bayes classifier in the Hausdorff distance. This significantly strengthens previous results, which generally focus on $L^1$-type convergence. The main argument relies upon direct geometric comparisons and is inspired by techniques from geometric measure theory.

Read more

6/24/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

A General Framework for Learning from Weak Supervision

Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, Lei Feng, Xiang Li, Yidong Wang, Xing Xie, Masashi Sugiyama, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj

Weakly supervised learning generally faces challenges in applicability to various scenarios with diverse weak supervision and in scalability due to the complexity of existing algorithms, thereby hindering the practical deployment. This paper introduces a general framework for learning from weak supervision (GLWS) with a novel algorithm. Central to GLWS is an Expectation-Maximization (EM) formulation, adeptly accommodating various weak supervision sources, including instance partial labels, aggregate statistics, pairwise observations, and unlabeled data. We further present an advanced algorithm that significantly simplifies the EM computational demands using a Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (NFA) along with a forward-backward algorithm, which effectively reduces time complexity from quadratic or factorial often required in existing solutions to linear scale. The problem of learning from arbitrary weak supervision is therefore converted to the NFA modeling of them. GLWS not only enhances the scalability of machine learning models but also demonstrates superior performance and versatility across 11 weak supervision scenarios. We hope our work paves the way for further advancements and practical deployment in this field.

Read more

6/6/2024

Interactive Machine Teaching by Labeling Rules and Instances
Total Score

0

Interactive Machine Teaching by Labeling Rules and Instances

Giannis Karamanolakis, Daniel Hsu, Luis Gravano

Weakly supervised learning aims to reduce the cost of labeling data by using expert-designed labeling rules. However, existing methods require experts to design effective rules in a single shot, which is difficult in the absence of proper guidance and tooling. Therefore, it is still an open question whether experts should spend their limited time writing rules or instead providing instance labels via active learning. In this paper, we investigate how to exploit an expert's limited time to create effective supervision. First, to develop practical guidelines for rule creation, we conduct an exploratory analysis of diverse collections of existing expert-designed rules and find that rule precision is more important than coverage across datasets. Second, we compare rule creation to individual instance labeling via active learning and demonstrate the importance of both across 6 datasets. Third, we propose an interactive learning framework, INTERVAL, that achieves efficiency by automatically extracting candidate rules based on rich patterns (e.g., by prompting a language model), and effectiveness by soliciting expert feedback on both candidate rules and individual instances. Across 6 datasets, INTERVAL outperforms state-of-the-art weakly supervised approaches by 7% in F1. Furthermore, it requires as few as 10 queries for expert feedback to reach F1 values that existing active learning methods cannot match even with 100 queries.

Read more

9/10/2024