General Lipschitz: Certified Robustness Against Resolvable Semantic Transformations via Transformation-Dependent Randomized Smoothing

Read original: arXiv:2309.16710 - Published 8/12/2024 by Dmitrii Korzh, Mikhail Pautov, Olga Tsymboi, Ivan Oseledets

🛠️

Overview

Randomized smoothing is a state-of-the-art technique for constructing image classifiers that are provably robust against certain types of adversarial attacks.
However, it is more challenging to construct robustness certificates against semantic transformations like blurring, translation, or gamma correction.
This paper proposes a new framework called General Lipschitz (GL) to certify neural networks against composable and resolvable semantic perturbations.
The method analyzes the transformation-dependent Lipschitz continuity of smoothed classifiers and derives robustness certificates accordingly.
The proposed approach performs comparably to existing state-of-the-art methods on the ImageNet dataset.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you have an image classification model that can accurately identify objects in images. Researchers have found a way to make these models "robust," meaning they can still work well even if the image is slightly altered, like by adding some noise or distortion. This technique is called "randomized smoothing."

However, there are other ways an image can be changed, like blurring, shifting, or adjusting the colors. It's harder to guarantee that the model will still work well under those types of transformations.

In this paper, the researchers propose a new framework called "General Lipschitz" (or GL for short) to address this problem. The key idea is to analyze how the "smoothness" of the model changes depending on the type of transformation applied to the image. From this, they can derive guarantees about how robust the model will be to different types of image changes.

Compared to other state-of-the-art methods, the GL framework performs similarly well on a challenging image classification dataset called ImageNet. This suggests it could be a useful tool for building more robust and versatile image classification models.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the General Lipschitz (GL) framework for certifying the robustness of neural networks against composable and resolvable semantic perturbations.

The key insight is to analyze the transformation-dependent Lipschitz continuity of the smoothed classifier with respect to transformation parameters. From this, the authors derive corresponding robustness certificates that can handle a broader range of semantic perturbations compared to prior work on randomized smoothing.

Specifically, the GL framework involves:

Modeling transformations: Representing image transformations as parameterized functions and analyzing their Lipschitz continuity.
Smoothed classifier analysis: Studying the Lipschitz continuity of the smoothed classifier with respect to the transformation parameters.
Robustness certification: Deriving robustness certificates that quantify the maximum tolerable transformation magnitude while preserving the classifier's predictions.

The authors demonstrate that the GL framework performs comparably to state-of-the-art randomized smoothing approaches on the ImageNet dataset, while providing broader robustness guarantees against semantic transformations.

Critical Analysis

The GL framework represents an important step forward in certifying the robustness of neural networks against a wider range of perturbations beyond just additive noise.

However, the paper acknowledges some limitations:

The analysis is restricted to "resolvable" transformations, meaning the transformation parameters can be accurately estimated. More complex, unresolvable transformations remain a challenge.
The certification process can be computationally expensive, especially for large neural networks and high-dimensional image spaces.
The approach assumes access to accurate models of the transformation functions, which may not always be available in practice.

Additionally, while the results on ImageNet are promising, further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of the GL framework to other datasets, model architectures, and real-world deployment scenarios.

Nonetheless, this work highlights the value of studying the fundamental mathematical properties of neural networks, such as Lipschitz continuity, to develop more robust and trustworthy machine learning systems.

Conclusion

The General Lipschitz (GL) framework proposed in this paper represents an important advancement in the field of provable robustness for neural networks. By analyzing the transformation-dependent Lipschitz continuity of smoothed classifiers, the authors have developed a method to certify the robustness of image classification models against a broader range of semantic perturbations.

While the approach has some limitations, it demonstrates the potential of incorporating deeper mathematical insights into the design of robust machine learning systems. As the field continues to evolve, techniques like GL may play a key role in building AI models that are more reliable, trustworthy, and resilient to real-world challenges.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

General Lipschitz: Certified Robustness Against Resolvable Semantic Transformations via Transformation-Dependent Randomized Smoothing

Dmitrii Korzh, Mikhail Pautov, Olga Tsymboi, Ivan Oseledets

Randomized smoothing is the state-of-the-art approach to construct image classifiers that are provably robust against additive adversarial perturbations of bounded magnitude. However, it is more complicated to construct reasonable certificates against semantic transformation (e.g., image blurring, translation, gamma correction) and their compositions. In this work, we propose emph{General Lipschitz (GL),} a new framework to certify neural networks against composable resolvable semantic perturbations. Within the framework, we analyze transformation-dependent Lipschitz-continuity of smoothed classifiers w.r.t. transformation parameters and derive corresponding robustness certificates. Our method performs comparably to state-of-the-art approaches on the ImageNet dataset.

8/12/2024

SPLITZ: Certifiable Robustness via Split Lipschitz Randomized Smoothing

Meiyu Zhong, Ravi Tandon

Certifiable robustness gives the guarantee that small perturbations around an input to a classifier will not change the prediction. There are two approaches to provide certifiable robustness to adversarial examples: a) explicitly training classifiers with small Lipschitz constants, and b) Randomized smoothing, which adds random noise to the input to create a smooth classifier. We propose textit{SPLITZ}, a practical and novel approach which leverages the synergistic benefits of both the above ideas into a single framework. Our main idea is to textit{split} a classifier into two halves, constrain the Lipschitz constant of the first half, and smooth the second half via randomization. Motivation for textit{SPLITZ} comes from the observation that many standard deep networks exhibit heterogeneity in Lipschitz constants across layers. textit{SPLITZ} can exploit this heterogeneity while inheriting the scalability of randomized smoothing. We present a principled approach to train textit{SPLITZ} and provide theoretical analysis to derive certified robustness guarantees during inference. We present a comprehensive comparison of robustness-accuracy tradeoffs and show that textit{SPLITZ} consistently improves upon existing state-of-the-art approaches on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. For instance, with $ell_2$ norm perturbation budget of textbf{$epsilon=1$}, textit{SPLITZ} achieves $textbf{43.2%}$ top-1 test accuracy on CIFAR-10 dataset compared to state-of-art top-1 test accuracy $textbf{39.8%}

7/4/2024

🚀

A Recipe for Improved Certifiable Robustness

Kai Hu, Klas Leino, Zifan Wang, Matt Fredrikson

Recent studies have highlighted the potential of Lipschitz-based methods for training certifiably robust neural networks against adversarial attacks. A key challenge, supported both theoretically and empirically, is that robustness demands greater network capacity and more data than standard training. However, effectively adding capacity under stringent Lipschitz constraints has proven more difficult than it may seem, evident by the fact that state-of-the-art approach tend more towards emph{underfitting} than overfitting. Moreover, we posit that a lack of careful exploration of the design space for Lipshitz-based approaches has left potential performance gains on the table. In this work, we provide a more comprehensive evaluation to better uncover the potential of Lipschitz-based certification methods. Using a combination of novel techniques, design optimizations, and synthesis of prior work, we are able to significantly improve the state-of-the-art VRA for deterministic certification on a variety of benchmark datasets, and over a range of perturbation sizes. Of particular note, we discover that the addition of large ``Cholesky-orthogonalized residual dense'' layers to the end of existing state-of-the-art Lipschitz-controlled ResNet architectures is especially effective for increasing network capacity and performance. Combined with filtered generative data augmentation, our final results further the state of the art deterministic VRA by up to 8.5 percentage pointsfootnote{Code is available at url{https://github.com/hukkai/liresnet}}.

6/26/2024

Robust Classification by Coupling Data Mollification with Label Smoothing

Markus Heinonen, Ba-Hien Tran, Michael Kampffmeyer, Maurizio Filippone

Introducing training-time augmentations is a key technique to enhance generalization and prepare deep neural networks against test-time corruptions. Inspired by the success of generative diffusion models, we propose a novel approach coupling data augmentation, in the form of image noising and blurring, with label smoothing to align predicted label confidences with image degradation. The method is simple to implement, introduces negligible overheads, and can be combined with existing augmentations. We demonstrate improved robustness and uncertainty quantification on the corrupted image benchmarks of the CIFAR and TinyImageNet datasets.

6/4/2024