A Recipe for Improved Certifiable Robustness

Overview

• This paper examines the use of Lipschitz-based methods for training neural networks that are robust to adversarial attacks.
• The key challenge is that robust networks require greater capacity (complexity) and more data than standard neural networks.
• However, effectively adding capacity under Lipschitz constraints has proven difficult, often leading to underfitting rather than overfitting.
• The authors propose a more comprehensive evaluation of Lipschitz-based certification methods to uncover their full potential.

Plain English Explanation

Adversarial attacks are a type of attack on neural networks where small, carefully crafted changes to the input can cause the network to make incorrect predictions. Lipschitz-based methods are a way of training neural networks to be certifiably robust against such attacks, meaning the network's outputs are guaranteed to not change much even if the input is slightly perturbed.

The challenge with these Lipschitz-based methods is that they require the neural network to have more capacity (complexity) and more training data than standard neural networks. This is because being robust to adversarial attacks is a more difficult task than standard prediction. However, adding this extra capacity under the strict Lipschitz constraints has proven tricky, often leading the networks to underfit the data rather than overfit.

In this work, the authors take a comprehensive look at Lipschitz-based certification methods to try to unlock their full potential. They use a combination of new techniques, design optimizations, and ideas from previous work to significantly improve the state-of-the-art performance of these certifiably robust neural networks.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is a more thorough exploration of the design space for Lipschitz-constrained neural networks. The authors experiment with a variety of novel techniques, including:

1. Adding large "Cholesky-orthogonalized residual dense" layers to the end of existing Lipschitz-controlled ResNet architectures. This helps increase the network's capacity and performance.
2. Combining this architectural change with filtered generative data augmentation, further boosting the network's robustness.

Through these innovations, the authors are able to significantly improve the Verifiable Robust Accuracy (VRA) - a measure of how well the network can be certified as robust to adversarial attacks - over previous state-of-the-art approaches. In some cases, they see VRA improvements of up to 8.5 percentage points.

Critical Analysis

The authors rightly point out that a lack of careful exploration of the Lipschitz-based design space has limited the performance of these certifiably robust networks in the past. Their comprehensive evaluation and novel techniques represent an important step forward.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the increased network capacity and data requirements may make Lipschitz-based training less practical or scalable for larger, more complex models and datasets. Additionally, the paper focuses only on deterministic certification, while probabilistic approaches may offer alternative trade-offs worth exploring.

Further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use cases of Lipschitz-based methods for training certifiably robust neural networks. The insights from this paper, however, provide a valuable contribution towards that goal.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step forward in unlocking the potential of Lipschitz-based methods for training certifiably robust neural networks. By exploring the design space more comprehensively and introducing novel techniques, the authors are able to significantly improve the state-of-the-art in terms of Verifiable Robust Accuracy.

While further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and best practices for these Lipschitz-constrained networks, this work demonstrates that careful architectural design and optimization can lead to meaningful gains in the robustness of neural networks to adversarial attacks. This is a crucial capability as neural networks become more widely deployed in high-stakes applications.