SPLITZ: Certifiable Robustness via Split Lipschitz Randomized Smoothing
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces SPLITZ, a new approach for certifying the robustness of machine learning models against adversarial attacks.
• SPLITZ leverages randomized smoothing, a technique that adds noise to the model's inputs, and Lipschitz constants, which measure the model's sensitivity to small changes in its inputs.
• The key innovation in SPLITZ is a "split" architecture that divides the model into two parts, allowing for tighter Lipschitz bounds and improved robustness certification.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small, imperceptible changes to the input can cause the model to make incorrect predictions. Certifying the robustness of these models - that is, guaranteeing their performance in the face of adversarial attacks - is an important challenge.
The SPLITZ approach tackles this problem by using randomized smoothing, a technique that adds noise to the model's inputs. This makes the model more resilient to small changes, since the noise obscures the subtle adversarial perturbations. SPLITZ also leverages Lipschitz constants, which measure how sensitive the model's outputs are to changes in its inputs.
The key innovation in SPLITZ is its "split" architecture, which divides the model into two parts. This allows for tighter Lipschitz bounds and more accurate robustness certification, leading to improved certifiable robustness compared to previous approaches.
Technical Explanation
SPLITZ is a new randomized smoothing technique for certifying the robustness of machine learning models. It works by dividing the model into two parts, each with its own Lipschitz constant. This "split" architecture allows for tighter Lipschitz bounds, which are used to quantify the model's sensitivity to adversarial perturbations.
The first part of the SPLITZ model is a feature extractor, which maps the input to a lower-dimensional representation. The second part is a classifier that operates on this feature representation. By splitting the model in this way, the authors are able to derive sharper Lipschitz bounds, leading to improved certifiable robustness compared to previous randomized smoothing approaches.
The authors evaluate SPLITZ on standard image classification benchmarks and show that it outperforms existing randomized smoothing methods in terms of both clean accuracy and certified robustness. They also provide theoretical analysis to explain the benefits of the split architecture.
Critical Analysis
The SPLITZ approach represents an important advancement in the field of certifiable robustness for machine learning models. By leveraging a split architecture and tighter Lipschitz bounds, the authors are able to achieve state-of-the-art results on standard benchmarks.
However, the paper does not address the potential computational overhead of the split architecture, which may limit its practicality for larger, more complex models. Additionally, the authors only evaluate SPLITZ on image classification tasks, and it remains to be seen how well the approach generalizes to other domains.
Further research is needed to explore the scalability and broader applicability of the SPLITZ method. Incorporating additional techniques, such as cost-sensitive learning or incremental certification, may also lead to further improvements in certifiable robustness.
Conclusion
The SPLITZ approach represents a significant advancement in the field of certifiable robustness for machine learning models. By leveraging a split architecture and tighter Lipschitz bounds, the authors have demonstrated state-of-the-art results on standard image classification benchmarks.
While the paper does not address all the practical challenges of deploying such models in real-world settings, the SPLITZ technique is a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to build more robust and trustworthy AI systems. Further research and development in this area will be crucial as machine learning becomes increasingly ubiquitous in high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
SPLITZ: Certifiable Robustness via Split Lipschitz Randomized Smoothing
Meiyu Zhong, Ravi Tandon
Certifiable robustness gives the guarantee that small perturbations around an input to a classifier will not change the prediction. There are two approaches to provide certifiable robustness to adversarial examples: a) explicitly training classifiers with small Lipschitz constants, and b) Randomized smoothing, which adds random noise to the input to create a smooth classifier. We propose textit{SPLITZ}, a practical and novel approach which leverages the synergistic benefits of both the above ideas into a single framework. Our main idea is to textit{split} a classifier into two halves, constrain the Lipschitz constant of the first half, and smooth the second half via randomization. Motivation for textit{SPLITZ} comes from the observation that many standard deep networks exhibit heterogeneity in Lipschitz constants across layers. textit{SPLITZ} can exploit this heterogeneity while inheriting the scalability of randomized smoothing. We present a principled approach to train textit{SPLITZ} and provide theoretical analysis to derive certified robustness guarantees during inference. We present a comprehensive comparison of robustness-accuracy tradeoffs and show that textit{SPLITZ} consistently improves upon existing state-of-the-art approaches on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. For instance, with $ell_2$ norm perturbation budget of textbf{$epsilon=1$}, textit{SPLITZ} achieves $textbf{43.2%}$ top-1 test accuracy on CIFAR-10 dataset compared to state-of-art top-1 test accuracy $textbf{39.8%}
Read more7/4/2024
🛠️
0
General Lipschitz: Certified Robustness Against Resolvable Semantic Transformations via Transformation-Dependent Randomized Smoothing
Dmitrii Korzh, Mikhail Pautov, Olga Tsymboi, Ivan Oseledets
Randomized smoothing is the state-of-the-art approach to construct image classifiers that are provably robust against additive adversarial perturbations of bounded magnitude. However, it is more complicated to construct reasonable certificates against semantic transformation (e.g., image blurring, translation, gamma correction) and their compositions. In this work, we propose emph{General Lipschitz (GL),} a new framework to certify neural networks against composable resolvable semantic perturbations. Within the framework, we analyze transformation-dependent Lipschitz-continuity of smoothed classifiers w.r.t. transformation parameters and derive corresponding robustness certificates. Our method performs comparably to state-of-the-art approaches on the ImageNet dataset.
Read more8/12/2024
🚀
0
A Recipe for Improved Certifiable Robustness
Kai Hu, Klas Leino, Zifan Wang, Matt Fredrikson
Recent studies have highlighted the potential of Lipschitz-based methods for training certifiably robust neural networks against adversarial attacks. A key challenge, supported both theoretically and empirically, is that robustness demands greater network capacity and more data than standard training. However, effectively adding capacity under stringent Lipschitz constraints has proven more difficult than it may seem, evident by the fact that state-of-the-art approach tend more towards emph{underfitting} than overfitting. Moreover, we posit that a lack of careful exploration of the design space for Lipshitz-based approaches has left potential performance gains on the table. In this work, we provide a more comprehensive evaluation to better uncover the potential of Lipschitz-based certification methods. Using a combination of novel techniques, design optimizations, and synthesis of prior work, we are able to significantly improve the state-of-the-art VRA for deterministic certification on a variety of benchmark datasets, and over a range of perturbation sizes. Of particular note, we discover that the addition of large ``Cholesky-orthogonalized residual dense'' layers to the end of existing state-of-the-art Lipschitz-controlled ResNet architectures is especially effective for increasing network capacity and performance. Combined with filtered generative data augmentation, our final results further the state of the art deterministic VRA by up to 8.5 percentage pointsfootnote{Code is available at url{https://github.com/hukkai/liresnet}}.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Augment then Smooth: Reconciling Differential Privacy with Certified Robustness
Jiapeng Wu, Atiyeh Ashari Ghomi, David Glukhov, Jesse C. Cresswell, Franziska Boenisch, Nicolas Papernot
Machine learning models are susceptible to a variety of attacks that can erode trust, including attacks against the privacy of training data, and adversarial examples that jeopardize model accuracy. Differential privacy and certified robustness are effective frameworks for combating these two threats respectively, as they each provide future-proof guarantees. However, we show that standard differentially private model training is insufficient for providing strong certified robustness guarantees. Indeed, combining differential privacy and certified robustness in a single system is non-trivial, leading previous works to introduce complex training schemes that lack flexibility. In this work, we present DP-CERT, a simple and effective method that achieves both privacy and robustness guarantees simultaneously by integrating randomized smoothing into standard differentially private model training. Compared to the leading prior work, DP-CERT gives up to a 2.5% increase in certified accuracy for the same differential privacy guarantee on CIFAR10. Through in-depth persample metric analysis, we find that larger certifiable radii correlate with smaller local Lipschitz constants, and show that DP-CERT effectively reduces Lipschitz constants compared to other differentially private training methods. The code is available at github.com/layer6ailabs/dp-cert.
Read more7/23/2024