Generalizable Sarcasm Detection Is Just Around The Corner, Of Course!
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of developing generalizable sarcasm detection models, which can accurately identify sarcasm across diverse contexts and languages.
- The researchers highlight the need for more realistic evaluation setups and diverse datasets to better assess the performance and generalization capabilities of sarcasm detection models.
- They review related work in sarcasm detection and discuss several recently published datasets and evaluation approaches that aim to address the limitations of previous research.
Plain English Explanation
Sarcasm is a form of ironic or mocking language that can be difficult for computers to detect. Developing <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/genil-multilingual-dataset-generalizing-language">generalizable sarcasm detection models</a> that work well across different contexts and languages is a significant challenge.
The researchers in this paper argue that current sarcasm detection models often perform well on specific datasets but struggle to generalize to new scenarios. To address this, they review <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/more-realistic-evaluation-setup-generalisation-community-models">more realistic evaluation setups</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/auditing-large-language-models-enhanced-text-based">diverse datasets</a> that can better assess the true performance and generalization capabilities of sarcasm detection models.
The paper also discusses recent efforts to create <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/opsd-offensive-persian-social-media-dataset-its">multilingual</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/m2sa-multimodal-multilingual-model-sentiment-analysis-tweets">multimodal</a> sarcasm detection datasets and models, which aim to capture the nuanced and context-dependent nature of sarcastic language.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the current state of sarcasm detection research, highlighting the limitations of existing approaches. The authors argue that most sarcasm detection models are trained and evaluated on narrow, homogeneous datasets, which leads to poor generalization to real-world scenarios.
To address this, the researchers discuss the importance of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/more-realistic-evaluation-setup-generalisation-community-models">more realistic evaluation setups</a>, such as cross-dataset testing and out-of-domain evaluation. They also review several recently published datasets that aim to capture the diversity of sarcastic language, including <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/genil-multilingual-dataset-generalizing-language">multilingual</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/m2sa-multimodal-multilingual-model-sentiment-analysis-tweets">multimodal</a> datasets.
The paper also discusses the challenges of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/auditing-large-language-models-enhanced-text-based">auditing large language models</a> for sarcasm detection, as these models may exhibit biases or limitations that can hinder their performance in real-world settings.
Critical Analysis
While the paper highlights important issues in sarcasm detection research, it does not provide a comprehensive solution. The authors acknowledge the need for more diverse and realistic datasets, but the development of such resources remains an ongoing challenge.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential ethical concerns surrounding sarcasm detection, such as the risk of models misinterpreting nuanced or context-dependent language, or the potential for such models to be used for surveillance or censorship purposes.
Further research is needed to address the inherent complexities of sarcastic language and to ensure that sarcasm detection models are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.
Conclusion
This paper underscores the significant challenges in developing generalizable sarcasm detection models and calls for more realistic evaluation setups and diverse datasets to better assess their performance. By highlighting the limitations of current approaches and the need for more nuanced and context-aware sarcasm detection, the paper lays the groundwork for future research to address this important problem in natural language processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Generalizable Sarcasm Detection Is Just Around The Corner, Of Course!
Hyewon Jang, Diego Frassinelli
We tested the robustness of sarcasm detection models by examining their behavior when fine-tuned on four sarcasm datasets containing varying characteristics of sarcasm: label source (authors vs. third-party), domain (social media/online vs. offline conversations/dialogues), style (aggressive vs. humorous mocking). We tested their prediction performance on the same dataset (intra-dataset) and across different datasets (cross-dataset). For intra-dataset predictions, models consistently performed better when fine-tuned with third-party labels rather than with author labels. For cross-dataset predictions, most models failed to generalize well to the other datasets, implying that one type of dataset cannot represent all sorts of sarcasm with different styles and domains. Compared to the existing datasets, models fine-tuned on the new dataset we release in this work showed the highest generalizability to other datasets. With a manual inspection of the datasets and post-hoc analysis, we attributed the difficulty in generalization to the fact that sarcasm actually comes in different domains and styles. We argue that future sarcasm research should take the broad scope of sarcasm into account.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Towards Evaluating Large Language Models on Sarcasm Understanding
Yazhou Zhang, Chunwang Zou, Zheng Lian, Prayag Tiwari, Jing Qin
In the era of large language models (LLMs), the task of ``System I''~-~the fast, unconscious, and intuitive tasks, e.g., sentiment analysis, text classification, etc., have been argued to be successfully solved. However, sarcasm, as a subtle linguistic phenomenon, often employs rhetorical devices like hyperbole and figuration to convey true sentiments and intentions, involving a higher level of abstraction than sentiment analysis. There is growing concern that the argument about LLMs' success may not be fully tenable when considering sarcasm understanding. To address this question, we select eleven SOTA LLMs and eight SOTA pre-trained language models (PLMs) and present comprehensive evaluations on six widely used benchmark datasets through different prompting approaches, i.e., zero-shot input/output (IO) prompting, few-shot IO prompting, chain of thought (CoT) prompting. Our results highlight three key findings: (1) current LLMs underperform supervised PLMs based sarcasm detection baselines across six sarcasm benchmarks. This suggests that significant efforts are still required to improve LLMs' understanding of human sarcasm. (2) GPT-4 consistently and significantly outperforms other LLMs across various prompting methods, with an average improvement of 14.0%$uparrow$. Claude 3 and ChatGPT demonstrate the next best performance after GPT-4. (3) Few-shot IO prompting method outperforms the other two methods: zero-shot IO and few-shot CoT. The reason is that sarcasm detection, being a holistic, intuitive, and non-rational cognitive process, is argued not to adhere to step-by-step logical reasoning, making CoT less effective in understanding sarcasm compared to its effectiveness in mathematical reasoning tasks.
Read more8/27/2024
🗣️
0
CofiPara: A Coarse-to-fine Paradigm for Multimodal Sarcasm Target Identification with Large Multimodal Models
Hongzhan Lin, Zixin Chen, Ziyang Luo, Mingfei Cheng, Jing Ma, Guang Chen
Social media abounds with multimodal sarcasm, and identifying sarcasm targets is particularly challenging due to the implicit incongruity not directly evident in the text and image modalities. Current methods for Multimodal Sarcasm Target Identification (MSTI) predominantly focus on superficial indicators in an end-to-end manner, overlooking the nuanced understanding of multimodal sarcasm conveyed through both the text and image. This paper proposes a versatile MSTI framework with a coarse-to-fine paradigm, by augmenting sarcasm explainability with reasoning and pre-training knowledge. Inspired by the powerful capacity of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on multimodal reasoning, we first engage LMMs to generate competing rationales for coarser-grained pre-training of a small language model on multimodal sarcasm detection. We then propose fine-tuning the model for finer-grained sarcasm target identification. Our framework is thus empowered to adeptly unveil the intricate targets within multimodal sarcasm and mitigate the negative impact posed by potential noise inherently in LMMs. Experimental results demonstrate that our model far outperforms state-of-the-art MSTI methods, and markedly exhibits explainability in deciphering sarcasm as well.
Read more5/21/2024
0
NYK-MS: A Well-annotated Multi-modal Metaphor and Sarcasm Understanding Benchmark on Cartoon-Caption Dataset
Ke Chang, Hao Li, Junzhao Zhang, Yunfang Wu
Metaphor and sarcasm are common figurative expressions in people's communication, especially on the Internet or the memes popular among teenagers. We create a new benchmark named NYK-MS (NewYorKer for Metaphor and Sarcasm), which contains 1,583 samples for metaphor understanding tasks and 1,578 samples for sarcasm understanding tasks. These tasks include whether it contains metaphor/sarcasm, which word or object contains metaphor/sarcasm, what does it satirize and why does it contains metaphor/sarcasm, all of the 7 tasks are well-annotated by at least 3 annotators. We annotate the dataset for several rounds to improve the consistency and quality, and use GUI and GPT-4V to raise our efficiency. Based on the benchmark, we conduct plenty of experiments. In the zero-shot experiments, we show that Large Language Models (LLM) and Large Multi-modal Models (LMM) can't do classification task well, and as the scale increases, the performance on other 5 tasks improves. In the experiments on traditional pre-train models, we show the enhancement with augment and alignment methods, which prove our benchmark is consistent with previous dataset and requires the model to understand both of the two modalities.
Read more9/4/2024