When AI Eats Itself: On the Caveats of Data Pollution in the Era of Generative AI
2405.09597
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and large models are producing realistic outputs across various domains, such as images, text, speech, and music. Creating these advanced generative models requires significant resources, particularly large and high-quality datasets. To minimize training expenses, many algorithm developers use data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. However, not all synthetic data effectively improve model performance, necessitating a strategic balance in the use of real versus synthetic data to optimize outcomes. Currently, the previously well-controlled integration of real and synthetic data is becoming uncontrollable. The widespread and unregulated dissemination of synthetic data online leads to the contamination of datasets traditionally compiled through web scraping, now mixed with unlabeled synthetic data. This trend portends a future where generative AI systems may increasingly rely blindly on consuming self-generated data, raising concerns about model performance and ethical issues. What will happen if generative AI continuously consumes itself without discernment? What measures can we take to mitigate the potential adverse effects? There is a significant gap in the scientific literature regarding the impact of synthetic data use in generative AI, particularly in terms of the fusion of multimodal information. To address this research gap, this review investigates the consequences of integrating synthetic data blindly on training generative AI on both image and text modalities and explores strategies to mitigate these effects. The goal is to offer a comprehensive view of synthetic data's role, advocating for a balanced approach to its use and exploring practices that promote the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Generative AI technologies can produce realistic outputs across various domains, but creating these models requires significant resources and high-quality datasets.
- To reduce training costs, some developers use data created by the models themselves, but this can lead to performance issues.
- The uncontrolled dissemination of synthetic data online is contaminating traditionally curated datasets, raising concerns about the self-consumption of generative AI and its potential adverse effects.
- There is a gap in the scientific literature on the impact of synthetic data use in generative AI, particularly regarding the fusion of multimodal information.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now able to generate highly realistic images, text, speech, and music. However, training these advanced generative models requires significant resources, especially large and high-quality datasets.
To save money, some developers have started using data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. But this synthetic data doesn't always work well to improve model performance, so a careful balance between using real and synthetic data is needed.
At the same time, the widespread online sharing of synthetic data is starting to mix in with datasets traditionally compiled through web scraping. This means that generative AI systems may increasingly rely on consuming their own self-generated data, without being able to tell the difference. This raises concerns about the potential negative effects, such as model performance issues and ethical problems.
There is limited research on the impact of using synthetic data in generative AI, particularly when it comes to combining different types of information (like images and text). This review aims to investigate the consequences of blindly integrating synthetic data and explore strategies to address these challenges, in order to support the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the consequences of integrating synthetic data blindly on training generative AI models for both image and text modalities. It explores strategies to mitigate these effects and advocates for a balanced approach to the use of synthetic data.
The key points are:
- Generative AI technologies can now produce realistic outputs across various domains, but creating these advanced generative models requires significant resources, particularly large and high-quality datasets.
- To minimize training expenses, many algorithm developers use data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. However, not all synthetic data effectively improves model performance, necessitating a strategic balance in the use of real versus synthetic data.
- The previously well-controlled integration of real and synthetic data is becoming uncontrollable, as the widespread and unregulated dissemination of synthetic data online leads to the contamination of traditionally curated datasets.
- This trend portends a future where generative AI systems may increasingly rely blindly on consuming self-generated data, raising concerns about model performance and ethical issues.
- There is a significant gap in the scientific literature regarding the impact of synthetic data use in generative AI, particularly in terms of the fusion of multimodal information.
The paper aims to address this research gap by investigating the consequences of integrating synthetic data blindly and exploring strategies to mitigate these effects, in order to promote the sustainable development of generative AI technologies.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the potential risks of generative AI systems over-relying on synthetic data, particularly as the integration of real and synthetic data becomes increasingly uncontrolled. The authors highlight the need for a balanced approach to using synthetic data, as well as the potential for adverse biases to be amplified by the self-consumption of generative AI.
However, the paper does not provide specific details on the experiments or methodologies used to assess the impact of synthetic data integration. Additionally, while the authors call for strategies to mitigate the effects, they do not offer concrete proposals or guidelines for how this could be achieved in practice.
Further research is needed to better understand the long-term implications of the issues raised in this paper, such as the potential for iterative retraining to exacerbate problems or the development of best practices for the responsible use of synthetic data. The paper also does not address potential solutions related to data diversity or the ethical implications of synthetic data use.
Overall, the paper highlights an important area of concern for the field of generative AI, but more detailed research and practical guidance are needed to fully address the challenges identified.
Conclusion
This review paper explores the consequences of blindly integrating synthetic data into the training of generative AI models, particularly in the image and text domains. It highlights the growing trend of uncontrolled dissemination of synthetic data online, which is contaminating traditionally curated datasets and leading to concerns about generative AI systems increasingly relying on self-generated data.
The paper identifies a significant gap in the scientific literature regarding the impact of synthetic data use in generative AI, especially when it comes to the fusion of multimodal information. By investigating these issues, the authors aim to advocate for a balanced approach to the use of synthetic data and explore practices that promote the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models.
While the paper raises important concerns, more detailed research and practical guidance are needed to fully address the challenges identified, such as the potential for iterative retraining to exacerbate problems, the development of best practices for responsible synthetic data use, and the ethical implications of these emerging technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data for Language Models
Ruibo Liu, Jerry Wei, Fangyu Liu, Chenglei Si, Yanzhe Zhang, Jinmeng Rao, Steven Zheng, Daiyi Peng, Diyi Yang, Denny Zhou, Andrew M. Dai
0
0
The success of AI models relies on the availability of large, diverse, and high-quality datasets, which can be challenging to obtain due to data scarcity, privacy concerns, and high costs. Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution by generating artificial data that mimics real-world patterns. This paper provides an overview of synthetic data research, discussing its applications, challenges, and future directions. We present empirical evidence from prior art to demonstrate its effectiveness and highlight the importance of ensuring its factuality, fidelity, and unbiasedness. We emphasize the need for responsible use of synthetic data to build more powerful, inclusive, and trustworthy language models.
4/12/2024
📊
On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data
Quentin Bertrand, Avishek Joey Bose, Alexandre Duplessis, Marco Jiralerspong, Gauthier Gidel
0
0
Deep generative models have made tremendous progress in modeling complex data, often exhibiting generation quality that surpasses a typical human's ability to discern the authenticity of samples. Undeniably, a key driver of this success is enabled by the massive amounts of web-scale data consumed by these models. Due to these models' striking performance and ease of availability, the web will inevitably be increasingly populated with synthetic content. Such a fact directly implies that future iterations of generative models will be trained on both clean and artificially generated data from past models. In this paper, we develop a framework to rigorously study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets -- from classical training on real data to self-consuming generative models trained on purely synthetic data. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough and the proportion of clean training data (w.r.t. synthetic data) is large enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models on CIFAR10 and FFHQ.
4/3/2024
🔎
Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models
Shi Fu, Sen Zhang, Yingjie Wang, Xinmei Tian, Dacheng Tao
0
0
This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop, wherein successive generations of models are recursively trained on mixtures of real and synthetic data from previous generations. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models, including parametric and non-parametric models. Specifically, we derive bounds on the total variation (TV) distance between the synthetic data distributions produced by future models and the original real data distribution under various mixed training scenarios for diffusion models with a one-hidden-layer neural network score function. Our analysis demonstrates that this distance can be effectively controlled under the condition that mixed training dataset sizes or proportions of real data are large enough. Interestingly, we further unveil a phase transition induced by expanding synthetic data amounts, proving theoretically that while the TV distance exhibits an initial ascent, it declines beyond a threshold point. Finally, we present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
6/26/2024
📊
Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs
Brian Belgodere, Pierre Dognin, Adam Ivankay, Igor Melnyk, Youssef Mroueh, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Jiri Navratil, Apoorva Nitsure, Inkit Padhi, Mattia Rigotti, Jerret Ross, Yair Schiff, Radhika Vedpathak, Richard A. Young
0
0
Real-world data often exhibits bias, imbalance, and privacy risks. Synthetic datasets have emerged to address these issues. This paradigm relies on generative AI models to generate unbiased, privacy-preserving data while maintaining fidelity to the original data. However, assessing the trustworthiness of synthetic datasets and models is a critical challenge. We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases like education, healthcare, banking, and human resources, spanning different data modalities such as tabular, time-series, vision, and natural language. This holistic assessment is essential for compliance with regulatory safeguards. We introduce a trustworthiness index to rank synthetic datasets based on their safeguards trade-offs. Furthermore, we present a trustworthiness-driven model selection and cross-validation process during training, exemplified with TrustFormers across various data types. This approach allows for controllable trustworthiness trade-offs in synthetic data creation. Our auditing framework fosters collaboration among stakeholders, including data scientists, governance experts, internal reviewers, external certifiers, and regulators. This transparent reporting should become a standard practice to prevent bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, ensuring compliance with policies and providing accountability, safety, and performance guarantees.
6/11/2024