Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference
2406.01862
0
0
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) pose significant risks, particularly in the realm of online election interference. This paper explores the nefarious applications of GenAI, highlighting their potential to disrupt democratic processes through deepfakes, botnets, targeted misinformation campaigns, and synthetic identities.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the potential risks of using synthetic images generated by AI systems for online election interference.
- The research highlights the growing concern over the malicious use of generative AI technologies to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion.
- The paper provides insights into the capabilities of these AI-generated images and how they could be leveraged to undermine the integrity of democratic processes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how advanced AI systems, such as Midjourney, can be used to create highly realistic synthetic images that are virtually indistinguishable from real photographs. This raises concerns about the potential for these AI-generated images to be used for online election interference, where they could be spread on social media platforms to sway public opinion and influence the outcome of elections.
The research highlights the dual nature of generative AI - its ability to be both beneficial and harmful. While these AI systems can be used for creative and constructive purposes, they can also be exploited by bad actors to spread misinformation and manipulate the public. This is a growing concern as the technology continues to advance and become more accessible.
The paper emphasizes the need to anticipate and evaluate the societal impacts of these AI systems, and to develop ethical frameworks and safeguards to prevent their misuse. This is crucial to protect the integrity of democratic processes and ensure that the public can trust the information they encounter online.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the potential for AI-generated synthetic images to be used for online election interference. The researchers used a large language model-powered agent-based framework to simulate the spread of these AI-generated images on social media platforms.
The researchers trained their AI system using a dataset of real images and then used it to generate a large number of synthetic images that were designed to resemble real photographs. They then analyzed the characteristics of these AI-generated images and compared them to the real images, looking for any distinguishing features or artifacts that could be used to identify them as synthetic.
The results of the study showed that the AI-generated images were highly realistic and difficult to distinguish from real photographs, even by trained human observers. This suggests that these synthetic images could be easily used to spread misinformation and manipulate public opinion on social media platforms.
The researchers also explored the potential psychological and sociological impacts of these AI-generated images, including their ability to trigger emotional responses and influence people's perceptions and beliefs. They highlighted the need to develop methods for classifying and detecting AI-generated content in order to mitigate the risks of online election interference.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the potential misuse of generative AI technologies for online election interference. The researchers have provided a comprehensive analysis of the technical capabilities of these AI systems and the potential psychological and sociological impacts of their use.
However, the paper does not fully address the broader ethical implications of these technologies and the need for robust governance frameworks to regulate their use. The researchers acknowledge the dual nature of generative AI, but more could be done to explore the potential benefits of these technologies and how they could be harnessed for positive social impact.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed assessment of the limitations of the research or the potential areas for further exploration. While the results suggest that AI-generated images can be highly realistic and difficult to detect, more research is needed to fully understand the extent of this threat and the most effective countermeasures.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate around the societal impacts of generative AI technologies, but there is still much work to be done to address the complex ethical and governance challenges that these technologies present.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the growing concern over the potential misuse of generative AI technologies for online election interference. The researchers have provided a comprehensive analysis of the technical capabilities of these AI systems and the potential psychological and sociological impacts of their use.
The findings suggest that AI-generated synthetic images can be highly realistic and difficult to distinguish from real photographs, raising the risk that they could be used to spread misinformation and manipulate public opinion on social media platforms. This has significant implications for the integrity of democratic processes and the public's trust in the information they encounter online.
The paper emphasizes the need to anticipate and evaluate the societal impacts of these technologies, and to develop ethical frameworks and safeguards to prevent their misuse. This is a critical challenge that will require collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and technology companies to address.
Overall, this research underscores the importance of understanding the dual nature of generative AI and working to harness its potential for positive societal impact while mitigating the risks of its misuse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Generative AI Misuse: A Taxonomy of Tactics and Insights from Real-World Data
Nahema Marchal, Rachel Xu, Rasmi Elasmar, Iason Gabriel, Beth Goldberg, William Isaac
0
0
Generative, multimodal artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers transformative potential across industries, but its misuse poses significant risks. Prior research has shed light on the potential of advanced AI systems to be exploited for malicious purposes. However, we still lack a concrete understanding of how GenAI models are specifically exploited or abused in practice, including the tactics employed to inflict harm. In this paper, we present a taxonomy of GenAI misuse tactics, informed by existing academic literature and a qualitative analysis of approximately 200 observed incidents of misuse reported between January 2023 and March 2024. Through this analysis, we illuminate key and novel patterns in misuse during this time period, including potential motivations, strategies, and how attackers leverage and abuse system capabilities across modalities (e.g. image, text, audio, video) in the wild.
6/24/2024
🤖
New!The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar
0
0
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
6/28/2024
🔍
Classifying Human-Generated and AI-Generated Election Claims in Social Media
Alphaeus Dmonte, Marcos Zampieri, Kevin Lybarger, Massimiliano Albanese, Genya Coulter
0
0
Politics is one of the most prevalent topics discussed on social media platforms, particularly during major election cycles, where users engage in conversations about candidates and electoral processes. Malicious actors may use this opportunity to disseminate misinformation to undermine trust in the electoral process. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) exacerbates this issue by enabling malicious actors to generate misinformation at an unprecedented scale. Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content is often indistinguishable from authentic user content, raising concerns about the integrity of information on social networks. In this paper, we present a novel taxonomy for characterizing election-related claims. This taxonomy provides an instrument for analyzing election-related claims, with granular categories related to jurisdiction, equipment, processes, and the nature of claims. We introduce ElectAI, a novel benchmark dataset that consists of 9,900 tweets, each labeled as human- or AI-generated. For AI-generated tweets, the specific LLM variant that produced them is specified. We annotated a subset of 1,550 tweets using the proposed taxonomy to capture the characteristics of election-related claims. We explored the capabilities of LLMs in extracting the taxonomy attributes and trained various machine learning models using ElectAI to distinguish between human- and AI-generated posts and identify the specific LLM variant.
4/29/2024
🔍
Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies
Johannes Schneider, Rene Abraham, Christian Meske
0
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), specifically large language models like ChatGPT, has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance, encompassing technical and business perspectives. Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of developing a framework for GenAI governance within companies. This framework outlines the scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms tailored to harness business opportunities as well as mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. Our research contributes a focused approach to GenAI governance, offering practical insights for companies navigating the challenges of GenAI adoption and highlighting research gaps.
6/11/2024