Generative AI to Generate Test Data Generators
2401.17626
0
0
š¤
Abstract
Generating fake data is an essential dimension of modern software testing, as demonstrated by the number and significance of data faking libraries. Yet, developers of faking libraries cannot keep up with the wide range of data to be generated for different natural languages and domains. In this paper, we assess the ability of generative AI for generating test data in different domains. We design three types of prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs), which perform test data generation tasks at different levels of integrability: 1) raw test data generation, 2) synthesizing programs in a specific language that generate useful test data, and 3) producing programs that use state-of-the-art faker libraries. We evaluate our approach by prompting LLMs to generate test data for 11 domains. The results show that LLMs can successfully generate realistic test data generators in a wide range of domains at all three levels of integrability.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Modern software testing relies heavily on the use of fake data, but current data faking libraries struggle to keep up with the diverse needs of different domains and languages.
- This paper explores the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to generate realistic test data at varying levels of integration, from raw data to fully-fledged test data generation programs.
- The researchers designed three types of prompts to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in test data generation across 11 different domains.
- The results indicate that LLMs can successfully generate useful test data generators for a wide range of domains at all three levels of integration.
Plain English Explanation
When software developers test their programs, they often need to use made-up or "fake" data to ensure their code works correctly. This is because real-world data can be hard to come by or may contain sensitive information. However, the libraries and tools currently available for generating this fake data can't keep up with the ever-expanding range of data needed for different languages and subject areas.
The researchers in this study explored whether large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - could help solve this problem. They designed three types of prompts to see how well LLMs could generate useful test data:
- Raw Test Data Generation: Prompting the LLM to directly create sample test data.
- Test Data Generation Programs: Prompting the LLM to write programs that can generate test data.
- Advanced Test Data Generation: Prompting the LLM to create programs that use state-of-the-art "faker" libraries to generate test data.
The researchers evaluated these prompts by having the LLM generate test data for 11 different domains, such as e-commerce, telecommunications, and healthcare. The results showed that the LLM was able to successfully generate realistic and useful test data generators in all three levels of integration across a wide range of domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) as a solution to the challenge of generating diverse test data for modern software development. The researchers designed three types of prompts to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in test data generation:
- Raw Test Data Generation: Prompting the LLM to directly create sample test data, such as customer names, addresses, and order details.
- Test Data Generation Programs: Prompting the LLM to write programs in a specific language (e.g., Python) that can generate useful test data.
- Advanced Test Data Generation: Prompting the LLM to create programs that use state-of-the-art "faker" libraries, which are specialized tools for generating realistic test data.
The researchers evaluated these prompts by having the LLM generate test data for 11 different domains, including e-commerce, telecommunications, healthcare, and others. The results showed that the LLM was able to successfully generate realistic and useful test data generators in all three levels of integration across the wide range of domains.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to leveraging the capabilities of LLMs for the important task of test data generation. The researchers have demonstrated the LLM's ability to generate useful test data at different levels of integration, which could significantly streamline the software testing process.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it does not explore the quality and reliability of the generated test data, nor does it investigate the LLM's performance on edge cases or rare data types. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential biases or safety concerns that may arise from using LLMs for this purpose.
Further research could focus on validating the generated programs to ensure they meet the required test data characteristics, as well as exploring ways to mitigate class imbalance in the generated data. Addressing these areas could help strengthen the practical application of this approach in real-world software development scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the promising potential of using large language models (LLMs) to generate diverse and realistic test data for modern software testing. The researchers have designed a robust set of prompts that allow LLMs to generate useful test data at varying levels of integration, from raw data to fully-fledged test data generation programs.
The results show that LLMs can successfully generate test data for a wide range of domains, potentially addressing the limitations of current data faking libraries. This approach could streamline the software testing process and improve the overall quality of software applications.
While further research is needed to address potential limitations and ensure the reliability and safety of the generated test data, this study highlights the growing capabilities of LLMs in the field of software engineering and testing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement
Kefan Li, Yuan Yuan
0
0
Code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) has been extensively studied and achieved remarkable progress. As a complementary aspect to code generation, test case generation is of crucial importance in ensuring the quality and reliability of code. However, using LLMs as test case generators has been much less explored. Current research along this line primarily focuses on enhancing code generation with assistance from test cases generated by LLMs, while the performance of LLMs in test case generation alone has not been comprehensively examined. To bridge this gap, we conduct extensive experiments to study how well LLMs can generate high-quality test cases. We find that as the problem difficulty increases, state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to generate correct test cases, largely due to their inherent limitations in computation and reasoning. To mitigate this issue, we further propose a multi-agent framework called emph{TestChain} that decouples the generation of test inputs and test outputs. Notably, TestChain uses a ReAct format conversation chain for LLMs to interact with a Python interpreter in order to provide more accurate test outputs. Our results indicate that TestChain outperforms the baseline by a large margin. Particularly, in terms of the accuracy of test cases, TestChain using GPT-4 as the backbone achieves a 13.84% improvement over the baseline on the LeetCode-hard dataset.
4/23/2024
Test-Driven Development for Code Generation
Noble Saji Mathews, Meiyappan Nagappan
0
0
Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in generating code snippets directly from problem statements. This increasingly automated process mirrors traditional human-led software development, where code is often written in response to a requirement. Historically, Test-Driven Development (TDD) has proven its merit, requiring developers to write tests before the functional code, ensuring alignment with the initial problem statements. Applying TDD principles to LLM-based code generation offers one distinct benefit: it enables developers to verify the correctness of generated code against predefined tests. This paper investigates if and how TDD can be incorporated into AI-assisted code-generation processes. We experimentally evaluate our hypothesis that providing LLMs like GPT-4 and Llama 3 with tests in addition to the problem statements enhances code generation outcomes. We experimented with established function-level code generation benchmarks such as MBPP and HumanEval. Our results consistently demonstrate that including test cases leads to higher success in solving programming challenges. We assert that TDD is a promising paradigm for helping ensure that the code generated by LLMs effectively captures the requirements.
6/12/2024
Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers
Niels Mundler, Mark Niklas Muller, Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev
0
0
Rigorous software testing is crucial for developing and maintaining high-quality code, making automated test generation a promising avenue for both improving software quality and boosting the effectiveness of code generation methods. However, while code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) is an extraordinarily active research area, test generation remains relatively unexplored. We address this gap and investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents for formalizing user issues into test cases. To this end, we propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth patches, and golden tests. We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed specifically for test generation. Further, as test generation is a similar but more structured task than code generation, it allows for a more fine-grained analysis using fail-to-pass rate and coverage metrics, providing a dual metric for analyzing systems designed for code repair. Finally, we find that generated tests are an effective filter for proposed code fixes, doubling the precision of SWE-Agent.
6/21/2024
Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing
Xiaoyin Wang, Dakai Zhu
0
0
The latest paradigm shift in software development brings in the innovation and automation afforded by Large Language Models (LLMs), showcased by Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), which has shown remarkable capacity to generate code autonomously, significantly reducing the manual effort required for various programming tasks. Although, the potential benefits of LLM-generated code are vast, most notably in efficiency and rapid prototyping, as LLMs become increasingly integrated into the software development lifecycle and hence the supply chain, complex and multifaceted challenges arise as the code generated from these language models carry profound questions on quality and correctness. Research is required to comprehensively explore these critical concerns surrounding LLM-generated code. In this paper, we propose a novel solution called metamorphic prompt testing to address these challenges. Our intuitive observation is that intrinsic consistency always exists among correct code pieces but may not exist among flawed code pieces, so we can detect flaws in the code by detecting inconsistencies. Therefore, we can vary a given prompt to multiple prompts with paraphrasing, and to ask the LLM to acquire multiple versions of generated code, so that we can validate whether the semantic relations still hold in the acquired code through cross-validation. Our evaluation on HumanEval shows that metamorphic prompt testing is able to detect 75 percent of the erroneous programs generated by GPT-4, with a false positive rate of 8.6 percent.
6/12/2024