Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement
2404.13340
0
0
Abstract
Code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) has been extensively studied and achieved remarkable progress. As a complementary aspect to code generation, test case generation is of crucial importance in ensuring the quality and reliability of code. However, using LLMs as test case generators has been much less explored. Current research along this line primarily focuses on enhancing code generation with assistance from test cases generated by LLMs, while the performance of LLMs in test case generation alone has not been comprehensively examined. To bridge this gap, we conduct extensive experiments to study how well LLMs can generate high-quality test cases. We find that as the problem difficulty increases, state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to generate correct test cases, largely due to their inherent limitations in computation and reasoning. To mitigate this issue, we further propose a multi-agent framework called emph{TestChain} that decouples the generation of test inputs and test outputs. Notably, TestChain uses a ReAct format conversation chain for LLMs to interact with a Python interpreter in order to provide more accurate test outputs. Our results indicate that TestChain outperforms the baseline by a large margin. Particularly, in terms of the accuracy of test cases, TestChain using GPT-4 as the backbone achieves a 13.84% improvement over the baseline on the LeetCode-hard dataset.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) as test case generators for software systems.
- The authors evaluate the performance of LLMs in generating high-quality test cases and explore ways to enhance their capabilities.
- The research explores the potential of LLMs to automate the tedious task of test case generation, which is crucial for software quality assurance.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are artificial intelligence systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. In this research paper, the authors explore the idea of using LLMs to generate test cases for software systems.
Test cases are a crucial part of software development, as they help ensure that the software is working as expected and catch any potential problems or bugs. Traditionally, creating these test cases has been a manual and time-consuming process, requiring significant effort from software developers.
The researchers in this paper investigate whether LLMs can be used to automate the test case generation process. They evaluate the quality of the test cases generated by LLMs and explore ways to enhance their performance.
The key idea is that if LLMs can generate high-quality test cases, it could save a lot of time and effort for software developers, allowing them to focus on other important tasks. This could be particularly useful for large, complex software systems where manual test case generation can be a significant challenge.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the related work on using LLMs for various software engineering tasks, including test case generation. It then presents a study to evaluate the performance of LLMs in generating high-quality test cases.
The researchers used several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-3 and PaLM, to generate test cases for a variety of software systems. They assessed the quality of the generated test cases based on factors such as their ability to detect bugs, their coverage of the software's functionality, and their overall relevance and effectiveness.
The results of the study show that while LLMs can generate relevant and somewhat effective test cases, their performance is still limited compared to manually created test cases. The authors identify several areas for improvement, such as enhancing the LLMs' understanding of the software's requirements and its intended behavior.
To address these limitations, the paper explores various techniques to guide and enhance the LLMs' test case generation capabilities. These include incorporating domain-specific knowledge, using reinforcement learning to fine-tune the LLMs, and leveraging human feedback to improve the generated test cases.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough evaluation of LLMs as test case generators, acknowledging both their potential and their current limitations. The authors recognize that while LLMs show promise, they are not yet able to fully replace human-generated test cases in terms of quality and effectiveness.
One key limitation mentioned in the paper is the LLMs' lack of understanding of the software's requirements and intended behavior. This can lead to the generation of test cases that are not fully aligned with the system's expected functionality.
Another potential issue is the reliability and consistency of the LLMs' performance. The paper suggests that the quality of the generated test cases can vary significantly, which could be a concern for critical software systems where reliability is paramount.
The authors also note that the evaluation was conducted on a limited set of software systems and that further research is needed to assess the generalizability of the findings to a wider range of software domains.
Conclusion
This research paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) as test case generators for software systems. The results suggest that while LLMs show promise in automating the test case generation process, their current capabilities are still limited compared to manual test case creation.
The paper identifies several areas for improvement, such as enhancing the LLMs' understanding of software requirements and leveraging techniques like domain-specific knowledge and reinforcement learning to guide and enhance their test case generation capabilities.
Overall, the research highlights the potential of LLMs to streamline the software testing process, but also emphasizes the need for further advancements to fully realize the benefits of this approach. As LLMs continue to evolve, their ability to assist software developers in tasks like test case generation is likely to become an increasingly important area of study.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers
Niels Mundler, Mark Niklas Muller, Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev
0
0
Rigorous software testing is crucial for developing and maintaining high-quality code, making automated test generation a promising avenue for both improving software quality and boosting the effectiveness of code generation methods. However, while code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) is an extraordinarily active research area, test generation remains relatively unexplored. We address this gap and investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents for formalizing user issues into test cases. To this end, we propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth patches, and golden tests. We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed specifically for test generation. Further, as test generation is a similar but more structured task than code generation, it allows for a more fine-grained analysis using fail-to-pass rate and coverage metrics, providing a dual metric for analyzing systems designed for code repair. Finally, we find that generated tests are an effective filter for proposed code fixes, doubling the precision of SWE-Agent.
6/21/2024
A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation
Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Jiasi Shen, Sungju Kim, Sunghun Kim
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks, known as Code LLMs, particularly in code generation that generates source code with LLM from natural language descriptions. This burgeoning field has captured significant interest from both academic researchers and industry professionals due to its practical significance in software development, e.g., GitHub Copilot. Despite the active exploration of LLMs for a variety of code tasks, either from the perspective of natural language processing (NLP) or software engineering (SE) or both, there is a noticeable absence of a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review dedicated to LLM for code generation. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by providing a systematic literature review that serves as a valuable reference for researchers investigating the cutting-edge progress in LLMs for code generation. We introduce a taxonomy to categorize and discuss the recent developments in LLMs for code generation, covering aspects such as data curation, latest advances, performance evaluation, and real-world applications. In addition, we present a historical overview of the evolution of LLMs for code generation and offer an empirical comparison using the widely recognized HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks to highlight the progressive enhancements in LLM capabilities for code generation. We identify critical challenges and promising opportunities regarding the gap between academia and practical development. Furthermore, we have established a dedicated resource website (https://codellm.github.io) to continuously document and disseminate the most recent advances in the field.
6/4/2024
A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
Xuanfan Ni, Piji Li
0
0
Recent efforts have evaluated large language models (LLMs) in areas such as commonsense reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and code generation. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has specifically investigated the performance of LLMs in natural language generation (NLG) tasks, a pivotal criterion for determining model excellence. Thus, this paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of well-known and high-performing LLMs, namely ChatGPT, ChatGLM, T5-based models, LLaMA-based models, and Pythia-based models, in the context of NLG tasks. We select English and Chinese datasets encompassing Dialogue Generation and Text Summarization. Moreover, we propose a common evaluation setting that incorporates input templates and post-processing strategies. Our study reports both automatic results, accompanied by a detailed analysis.
5/17/2024
š¬
ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code
Xiangru Tang, Yuliang Liu, Zefan Cai, Yanjun Shao, Junjie Lu, Yichi Zhang, Zexuan Deng, Helan Hu, Kaikai An, Ruijun Huang, Shuzheng Si, Sheng Chen, Haozhe Zhao, Liang Chen, Yan Wang, Tianyu Liu, Zhiwei Jiang, Baobao Chang, Yin Fang, Yujia Qin, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yilun Zhao, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
0
0
Despite Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 achieving impressive results in function-level code generation, they struggle with repository-scale code understanding (e.g., coming up with the right arguments for calling routines), requiring a deeper comprehension of complex file interactions. Also, recently, people have developed LLM agents that attempt to interact with repository code (e.g., compiling and evaluating its execution), prompting the need to evaluate their performance. These gaps have motivated our development of ML-Bench, a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. Addressing the need for LLMs to interpret long code contexts and translate instructions into precise, executable scripts, ML-Bench encompasses annotated 9,641 examples across 18 GitHub repositories, challenging LLMs to accommodate user-specified arguments and documentation intricacies effectively. To evaluate both LLMs and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment. Our findings indicate that while GPT-4o leads with a Pass@5 rate surpassing 50%, there remains significant scope for improvement, highlighted by issues such as hallucinated outputs and difficulties with bash script generation. Notably, in the more demanding ML-Agent-Bench, GPT-4o achieves a 76.47% success rate, reflecting the efficacy of iterative action and feedback in complex task resolution. Our code, dataset, and models are available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/ML-bench.
6/19/2024