Automating Creativity

Read original: arXiv:2405.06915 - Published 5/14/2024 by Ming-Hui Huang, Roland T. Rust
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores how to evolve Generative AI (GenAI) from simply generating content to becoming genuinely creative.
  • It proposes a triple prompt-response-reward framework to develop the creative capabilities of GenAI.
  • The framework consists of three key components: a prompt model, a response model, and a reward model.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is interested in the question of how to make Generative AI (GenAI) systems more creative, beyond just producing content based on existing data. GenAI systems have so far disappointed in their creativity, as they are trained to generate outputs following human intentions and using existing information.

The proposed framework aims to address this by taking a reinforcement learning approach and building on research in computational creativity. It has three main parts:

  1. The prompt model focuses on developing discriminative prompts that can elicit creativity, by targeting outputs that are novel in some way - whether objectively, individually, or socially.

  2. The response model generates surprising and innovative outputs, which can be incrementally new, disruptively different, or radically novel.

  3. The reward model aims to improve the system's creativity over time, by incorporating feedback from the AI itself, the human creators/managers, and/or the customers/users.

By using this triple framework, the researchers believe GenAI can be applied strategically to achieve various levels of creativity, moving beyond simply replicating existing content.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a triple prompt-response-reward engineering framework to develop the creative capabilities of Generative AI (GenAI). This framework builds on computational creativity research and uses a reinforcement learning approach.

The first component is the prompt model, which focuses on developing discriminative prompts that can elicit creativity. These prompts target outputs that are novel in an objective, individual, or social sense.

The second component is the response model, which generates surprising and innovative outputs. These outputs can be incrementally new, disruptively different, or radically novel.

The third component is the reward model, which aims to improve the system's creativity over time. This model incorporates feedback from the AI itself, the human creators/managers, and/or the customers/users.

By using this framework, the researchers believe GenAI can be applied strategically to achieve various levels of creativity, going beyond simply replicating existing content.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a promising framework for advancing the creative capabilities of Generative AI (GenAI) systems. The authors acknowledge that current GenAI systems have limitations in their creativity, as they are primarily trained on existing data and human intentions.

The proposed triple prompt-response-reward framework offers a structured approach to addressing this issue. The focus on developing discriminative prompts, generating innovative responses, and incorporating feedback to improve creativity over time is a thoughtful and well-grounded approach.

However, the researchers also note that implementing this framework in practice may present challenges. Developing effective prompt models, response models, and reward systems that can reliably and consistently foster creativity in GenAI will likely require significant further research and experimentation.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential ethical considerations or societal implications of more creative GenAI systems. As these systems become more advanced, it will be crucial to carefully address issues related to responsible AI development and the impact on human-AI co-creation.

Overall, the proposed framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of Generative AI and computational creativity. However, further research and thoughtful implementation will be necessary to realize the full potential of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a framework for evolving Generative AI (GenAI) systems from simply generating content to becoming more genuinely creative. The proposed triple prompt-response-reward framework offers a structured approach to developing creative capabilities in GenAI, building on computational creativity research and reinforcement learning.

By focusing on prompts that elicit novel outputs, generating surprising and innovative responses, and incorporating feedback to improve creativity over time, the researchers aim to enable GenAI to be applied strategically for various levels of creativity. While implementing this framework in practice may present challenges, the paper provides a promising direction for advancing the field of Generative AI and exploring the possibilities of human-AI co-creation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Automating Creativity

Ming-Hui Huang, Roland T. Rust

Generative AI (GenAI) has spurred the expectation of being creative, due to its ability to generate content, yet so far, its creativity has somewhat disappointed, because it is trained using existing data following human intentions to generate outputs. The purpose of this paper is to explore what is required to evolve AI from generative to creative. Based on a reinforcement learning approach and building upon various research streams of computational creativity, we develop a triple prompt-response-reward engineering framework to develop the creative capability of GenAI. This framework consists of three components: 1) a prompt model for expected creativity by developing discriminative prompts that are objectively, individually, or socially novel, 2) a response model for observed creativity by generating surprising outputs that are incrementally, disruptively, or radically innovative, and 3) a reward model for improving creativity over time by incorporating feedback from the AI, the creator/manager, and/or the customers. This framework enables the application of GenAI for various levels of creativity strategically.

Read more

5/14/2024

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning
Total Score

0

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning

Lixiang Yan, Samuel Greiff, Ziwen Teuber, Dragan Gav{s}evi'c

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds the potential to transform the delivery, cultivation, and evaluation of human learning. This Perspective examines the integration of GenAI as a tool for human learning, addressing its promises and challenges from a holistic viewpoint that integrates insights from learning sciences, educational technology, and human-computer interaction. GenAI promises to enhance learning experiences by scaling personalised support, diversifying learning materials, enabling timely feedback, and innovating assessment methods. However, it also presents critical issues such as model imperfections, ethical dilemmas, and the disruption of traditional assessments. Cultivating AI literacy and adaptive skills is imperative for facilitating informed engagement with GenAI technologies. Rigorous research across learning contexts is essential to evaluate GenAI's impact on human cognition, metacognition, and creativity. Humanity must learn with and about GenAI, ensuring it becomes a powerful ally in the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, rather than a crutch that undermines our intellectual abilities.

Read more

9/6/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies

Yuan Sun, Qiurong Song, Xinning Gui, Fenglong Ma, Ting Wang

Automated machine learning (AutoML) is envisioned to make ML techniques accessible to ordinary users. Recent work has investigated the role of humans in enhancing AutoML functionality throughout a standard ML workflow. However, it is also critical to understand how users adopt existing AutoML solutions in complex, real-world settings from a holistic perspective. To fill this gap, this study conducted semi-structured interviews of AutoML users (N=19) focusing on understanding (1) the limitations of AutoML encountered by users in their real-world practices, (2) the strategies users adopt to cope with such limitations, and (3) how the limitations and workarounds impact their use of AutoML. Our findings reveal that users actively exercise user agency to overcome three major challenges arising from customizability, transparency, and privacy. Furthermore, users make cautious decisions about whether and how to apply AutoML on a case-by-case basis. Finally, we derive design implications for developing future AutoML solutions.

Read more

4/5/2024

Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies
Total Score

0

Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies

Yuan Sun, Eunchae Jang, Fenglong Ma, Ting Wang

Propelled by their remarkable capabilities to generate novel and engaging content, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies are disrupting traditional workflows in many industries. While prior research has examined GenAI from a techno-centric perspective, there is still a lack of understanding about how users perceive and utilize GenAI in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with (N=18) GenAI users in creative industries, investigating the human-GenAI co-creation process within a holistic LUA (Learning, Using and Assessing) framework. Our study uncovered an intriguingly complex landscape: Prospects-GenAI greatly fosters the co-creation between human expertise and GenAI capabilities, profoundly transforming creative workflows; Challenges-Meanwhile, users face substantial uncertainties and complexities arising from resource availability, tool usability, and regulatory compliance; Strategies-In response, users actively devise various strategies to overcome many of such challenges. Our study reveals key implications for the design of future GenAI tools.

Read more

4/8/2024