GeniL: A Multilingual Dataset on Generalizing Language
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new multilingual dataset called GeniL that aims to evaluate language models' ability to generalize across different languages and tasks
- Explores how language models perform on a range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks in 7 diverse languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Hindi, Chinese, and Arabic
- Provides insights into the strengths and limitations of current language models and highlights areas for further research and development
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new dataset called GeniL: A Multilingual Dataset on Generalizing Language that is designed to test how well language models can generalize their knowledge across different languages and tasks.
The researchers created a diverse set of NLP tasks in 7 languages - English, Spanish, French, German, Hindi, Chinese, and Arabic. This allows them to evaluate if language models can effectively apply what they've learned in one language to perform well in other languages as well.
By testing language models on this broad set of tasks and languages, the researchers aim to gain insights into the strengths and limitations of current language models. This can help guide future research and development to create more capable and versatile language models that can truly generalize their understanding across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Technical Explanation
The GeniL dataset consists of a range of NLP tasks including text classification, question answering, and natural language inference. These tasks are covered in 7 different languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Hindi, Chinese, and Arabic.
The researchers evaluated several state-of-the-art language models, including monolingual and multilingual versions of BERT and T5, on the GeniL dataset. They analyzed the models' performance across the different languages and tasks to understand their strengths and weaknesses in generalization.
The results show that while current language models demonstrate some ability to generalize, there is still significant room for improvement, especially when transitioning between more distant language pairs. The researchers identify several factors that influence a model's generalization capability, such as the linguistic and cultural proximity between the training and evaluation languages.
Critical Analysis
The GeniL dataset represents an important step forward in evaluating the capabilities of language models to generalize across languages and tasks. By including a diverse set of languages, the researchers are able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of model performance.
However, the paper acknowledges that the dataset is limited to a relatively small number of tasks and languages compared to the full breadth of human language and cognition. Additionally, the tasks may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world language use.
Further research is needed to explore how language models can better leverage cross-lingual knowledge and adapt to new languages and domains. Incorporating more inclusive and representative datasets, as well as addressing issues of bias and fairness, will be crucial for developing language models that can truly generalize in a meaningful and responsible way.
Conclusion
The GeniL dataset provides a valuable new benchmark for evaluating the generalization capabilities of language models across a diverse range of languages and tasks. The insights gained from this research can help guide future advancements in natural language processing, enabling the creation of language models that can more effectively communicate and collaborate across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
As language technologies become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, it is crucial that they are developed with a deep understanding of the complexities of human language and the need for inclusive, fair, and ethical approaches. The GeniL dataset represents an important step in this direction, paving the way for more robust and versatile language models that can truly serve the needs of a global, multilingual society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
GeniL: A Multilingual Dataset on Generalizing Language
Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Sagar Gubbi, Sunipa Dev, Shachi Dave, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
Generative language models are transforming our digital ecosystem, but they often inherit societal biases, for instance stereotypes associating certain attributes with specific identity groups. While whether and how these biases are mitigated may depend on the specific use cases, being able to effectively detect instances of stereotype perpetuation is a crucial first step. Current methods to assess presence of stereotypes in generated language rely on simple template or co-occurrence based measures, without accounting for the variety of sentential contexts they manifest in. We argue that understanding the sentential context is crucial for detecting instances of generalization. We distinguish two types of generalizations: (1) language that merely mentions the presence of a generalization (people think the French are very rude), and (2) language that reinforces such a generalization (as French they must be rude), from non-generalizing context (My French friends think I am rude). For meaningful stereotype evaluations, we need to reliably distinguish such instances of generalizations. We introduce the new task of detecting generalization in language, and build GeniL, a multilingual dataset of over 50K sentences from 9 languages (English, Arabic, Bengali, Spanish, French, Hindi, Indonesian, Malay, and Portuguese) annotated for instances of generalizations. We demonstrate that the likelihood of a co-occurrence being an instance of generalization is usually low, and varies across different languages, identity groups, and attributes. We build classifiers to detect generalization in language with an overall PR-AUC of 58.7, with varying degrees of performance across languages. Our research provides data and tools to enable a nuanced understanding of stereotype perpetuation, a crucial step towards more inclusive and responsible language technologies.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Towards Generalized Offensive Language Identification
Alphaeus Dmonte, Tejas Arya, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri
The prevalence of offensive content on the internet, encompassing hate speech and cyberbullying, is a pervasive issue worldwide. Consequently, it has garnered significant attention from the machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) communities. As a result, numerous systems have been developed to automatically identify potentially harmful content and mitigate its impact. These systems can follow two approaches; (1) Use publicly available models and application endpoints, including prompting large language models (LLMs) (2) Annotate datasets and train ML models on them. However, both approaches lack an understanding of how generalizable they are. Furthermore, the applicability of these systems is often questioned in off-domain and practical environments. This paper empirically evaluates the generalizability of offensive language detection models and datasets across a novel generalized benchmark. We answer three research questions on generalizability. Our findings will be useful in creating robust real-world offensive language detection systems.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Auditing Large Language Models for Enhanced Text-Based Stereotype Detection and Probing-Based Bias Evaluation
Zekun Wu, Sahan Bulathwela, Maria Perez-Ortiz, Adriano Soares Koshiyama
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly increased their presence in human-facing Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. However, LLMs could reproduce and even exacerbate stereotypical outputs from training data. This work introduces the Multi-Grain Stereotype (MGS) dataset, encompassing 51,867 instances across gender, race, profession, religion, and stereotypical text, collected by fusing multiple previously publicly available stereotype detection datasets. We explore different machine learning approaches aimed at establishing baselines for stereotype detection, and fine-tune several language models of various architectures and model sizes, presenting in this work a series of stereotypes classifier models for English text trained on MGS. To understand whether our stereotype detectors capture relevant features (aligning with human common sense) we utilise a variety of explanainable AI tools, including SHAP, LIME, and BertViz, and analyse a series of example cases discussing the results. Finally, we develop a series of stereotype elicitation prompts and evaluate the presence of stereotypes in text generation tasks with popular LLMs, using one of our best performing previously presented stereotypes detectors. Our experiments yielded several key findings: i) Training stereotype detectors in a multi-dimension setting yields better results than training multiple single-dimension classifiers.ii) The integrated MGS Dataset enhances both the in-dataset and cross-dataset generalisation ability of stereotype detectors compared to using the datasets separately. iii) There is a reduction in stereotypes in the content generated by GPT Family LLMs with newer versions.
Read more4/3/2024
0
Multilingual large language models leak human stereotypes across language boundaries
Yang Trista Cao, Anna Sotnikova, Jieyu Zhao, Linda X. Zou, Rachel Rudinger, Hal Daume III
Multilingual large language models have been increasingly popular for their proficiency in processing and generating text across various languages. Previous research has shown that the presence of stereotypes and biases in monolingual large language models can be attributed to the nature of their training data, which is collected from humans and reflects societal biases. Multilingual language models undergo the same training procedure as monolingual ones, albeit with training data sourced from various languages. This raises the question: do stereotypes present in one social context leak across languages within the model? In our work, we first define the term ``stereotype leakage'' and propose a framework for its measurement. With this framework, we investigate how stereotypical associations leak across four languages: English, Russian, Chinese, and Hindi. To quantify the stereotype leakage, we employ an approach from social psychology, measuring stereotypes via group-trait associations. We evaluate human stereotypes and stereotypical associations manifested in multilingual large language models such as mBERT, mT5, and GPT-3.5. Our findings show a noticeable leakage of positive, negative, and non-polar associations across all languages. Notably, Hindi within multilingual models appears to be the most susceptible to influence from other languages, while Chinese is the least. Additionally, GPT-3.5 exhibits a better alignment with human scores than other models. WARNING: This paper contains model outputs which could be offensive in nature.
Read more5/10/2024