GenoTEX: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Exploration of Gene Expression Data in Alignment with Bioinformaticians
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces GenoTEX, a benchmark for evaluating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to explore gene expression data in a way that aligns with the practices and needs of bioinformaticians.
• The goal is to assess how well LLMs can assist bioinformaticians in tasks like interpreting gene expression patterns, generating hypotheses, and communicating findings to domain experts.
Plain English Explanation
Bioinformaticians are scientists who use computers and data to study biology, particularly things like genes and how they are expressed (turned on and off) in living organisms. They often work with large, complex datasets that can be challenging to understand and analyze.
The researchers behind this paper wanted to see how well the latest AI language models, known as large language models (LLMs), could assist bioinformaticians in their work. They created a benchmark called GenoTEX to test the ability of LLMs to explore gene expression data in a way that aligns with the real-world needs and practices of bioinformaticians.
The idea is that if LLMs can effectively assist bioinformaticians, it could help speed up research, generate new insights, and improve communication between scientists in different fields. However, this requires the LLMs to understand the specific challenges and workflows of bioinformatics, which is what the GenoTEX benchmark aims to evaluate.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the design and development of the GenoTEX benchmark, which consists of a diverse set of tasks and datasets related to gene expression analysis. These tasks include interpreting gene expression patterns, generating hypotheses about biological mechanisms, and communicating findings to domain experts.
The researchers carefully curated the tasks and datasets to align with the real-world challenges faced by bioinformaticians, drawing on their deep understanding of the field. They also involved bioinformaticians in the benchmark development process to ensure its relevance and validity.
The paper outlines the key components of the GenoTEX benchmark, including the task types, datasets, and evaluation metrics. It also discusses the rationale behind the benchmark design, such as the need to capture both technical and communicative aspects of bioinformatics work.
Critical Analysis
The GenoTEX benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI-assisted bioinformatics, as it provides a standardized way to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in this domain. By aligning the benchmark with the needs and practices of bioinformaticians, the researchers have increased the likelihood that progress in this area will be meaningful and impactful.
However, the paper acknowledges that the benchmark is not comprehensive and may not capture all the nuances of bioinformatics work. Additionally, the performance of LLMs on the GenoTEX tasks may not directly translate to their real-world effectiveness in assisting bioinformaticians, as there are likely other factors to consider, such as the integration of these models into existing workflows and the trust and acceptance of bioinformaticians.
Further research and refinement of the GenoTEX benchmark, as well as studies on the practical deployment of LLMs in bioinformatics settings, would be valuable to fully understand the potential of this technology to support scientific discovery and collaboration.
Conclusion
The GenoTEX benchmark represents an important step forward in the quest to leverage the capabilities of large language models to assist bioinformaticians in their work. By designing the benchmark to align with the real-world needs and practices of the field, the researchers have created a valuable tool for evaluating the readiness of these AI systems to provide meaningful support to scientists in this domain.
As the field of AI-assisted bioinformatics continues to evolve, the GenoTEX benchmark and similar efforts will be crucial in guiding the development of technologies that can truly empower and augment the work of domain experts, ultimately accelerating scientific progress and discovery.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
GenoTEX: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Exploration of Gene Expression Data in Alignment with Bioinformaticians
Haoyang Liu, Haohan Wang
Recent advancements in machine learning have significantly improved the identification of disease-associated genes from gene expression datasets. However, these processes often require extensive expertise and manual effort, limiting their scalability. Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have shown promise in automating these tasks due to their increasing problem-solving abilities. To support the evaluation and development of such methods, we introduce GenoTEX, a benchmark dataset for the automatic exploration of gene expression data, involving the tasks of dataset selection, preprocessing, and statistical analysis. GenoTEX provides annotated code and results for solving a wide range of gene identification problems, in a full analysis pipeline that follows the standard of computational genomics. These annotations are curated by human bioinformaticians who carefully analyze the datasets to ensure accuracy and reliability. To provide baselines for these tasks, we present GenoAgents, a team of LLM-based agents designed with context-aware planning, iterative correction, and domain expert consultation to collaboratively explore gene datasets. Our experiments with GenoAgents demonstrate the potential of LLM-based approaches in genomics data analysis, while error analysis highlights the challenges and areas for future improvement. We propose GenoTEX as a promising resource for benchmarking and enhancing AI-driven methods for genomics data analysis. We make our benchmark publicly available at url{https://github.com/Liu-Hy/GenoTex}.
Read more6/24/2024
💬
0
GeneAgent: Self-verification Language Agent for Gene Set Knowledge Discovery using Domain Databases
Zhizheng Wang, Qiao Jin, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Shubo Tian, Po-Ting Lai, Qingqing Zhu, Chi-Ping Day, Christina Ross, Zhiyong Lu
Gene set knowledge discovery is essential for advancing human functional genomics. Recent studies have shown promising performance by harnessing the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) on this task. Nonetheless, their results are subject to several limitations common in LLMs such as hallucinations. In response, we present GeneAgent, a first-of-its-kind language agent featuring self-verification capability. It autonomously interacts with various biological databases and leverages relevant domain knowledge to improve accuracy and reduce hallucination occurrences. Benchmarking on 1,106 gene sets from different sources, GeneAgent consistently outperforms standard GPT-4 by a significant margin. Moreover, a detailed manual review confirms the effectiveness of the self-verification module in minimizing hallucinations and generating more reliable analytical narratives. To demonstrate its practical utility, we apply GeneAgent to seven novel gene sets derived from mouse B2905 melanoma cell lines, with expert evaluations showing that GeneAgent offers novel insights into gene functions and subsequently expedites knowledge discovery.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Geneverse: A collection of Open-source Multimodal Large Language Models for Genomic and Proteomic Research
Tianyu Liu, Yijia Xiao, Xiao Luo, Hua Xu, W. Jim Zheng, Hongyu Zhao
The applications of large language models (LLMs) are promising for biomedical and healthcare research. Despite the availability of open-source LLMs trained using a wide range of biomedical data, current research on the applications of LLMs to genomics and proteomics is still limited. To fill this gap, we propose a collection of finetuned LLMs and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), known as Geneverse, for three novel tasks in genomic and proteomic research. The models in Geneverse are trained and evaluated based on domain-specific datasets, and we use advanced parameter-efficient finetuning techniques to achieve the model adaptation for tasks including the generation of descriptions for gene functions, protein function inference from its structure, and marker gene selection from spatial transcriptomic data. We demonstrate that adapted LLMs and MLLMs perform well for these tasks and may outperform closed-source large-scale models based on our evaluations focusing on both truthfulness and structural correctness. All of the training strategies and base models we used are freely accessible.
Read more6/26/2024
💬
0
Gene Set Summarization using Large Language Models
Marcin P. Joachimiak, J. Harry Caufield, Nomi L. Harris, Hyeongsik Kim, Christopher J. Mungall
Molecular biologists frequently interpret gene lists derived from high-throughput experiments and computational analysis. This is typically done as a statistical enrichment analysis that measures the over- or under-representation of biological function terms associated with genes or their properties, based on curated assertions from a knowledge base (KB) such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Interpreting gene lists can also be framed as a textual summarization task, enabling the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), potentially utilizing scientific texts directly and avoiding reliance on a KB. We developed SPINDOCTOR (Structured Prompt Interpolation of Natural Language Descriptions of Controlled Terms for Ontology Reporting), a method that uses GPT models to perform gene set function summarization as a complement to standard enrichment analysis. This method can use different sources of gene functional information: (1) structured text derived from curated ontological KB annotations, (2) ontology-free narrative gene summaries, or (3) direct model retrieval. We demonstrate that these methods are able to generate plausible and biologically valid summary GO term lists for gene sets. However, GPT-based approaches are unable to deliver reliable scores or p-values and often return terms that are not statistically significant. Crucially, these methods were rarely able to recapitulate the most precise and informative term from standard enrichment, likely due to an inability to generalize and reason using an ontology. Results are highly nondeterministic, with minor variations in prompt resulting in radically different term lists. Our results show that at this point, LLM-based methods are unsuitable as a replacement for standard term enrichment analysis and that manual curation of ontological assertions remains necessary.
Read more7/8/2024