GeoGuide: Geometric guidance of diffusion models

Read original: arXiv:2407.12889 - Published 7/19/2024 by Mateusz Poleski, Jacek Tabor, Przemys{l}aw Spurek

🤖

Overview

This document provides guidelines for authors on how to format their responses to peer reviews of their papers submitted to arXiv.
It covers recommendations for the length of the response, as well as formatting instructions for the LaTeX document.
The guidelines aim to help ensure a consistent and professional presentation of author responses across submissions.

Plain English Explanation

When researchers submit a paper to the arXiv preprint server, they may receive feedback and comments from peer reviewers. The guidelines for author response outline how authors should format their replies to these peer reviews.

The key points are:

Response Length: Authors are advised to keep their response relatively concise, typically around 1-2 pages. This helps ensure the reviewers can easily digest the main points.
Formatting: The response should be prepared using LaTeX, a typesetting language commonly used in academic publishing. The document should follow a specific format, such as using particular font styles, section headings, and layout.

The goal of these guidelines is to help authors present their responses in a clear, consistent, and professional manner. This makes it easier for the reviewers to understand the authors' points and feedback, ultimately improving the peer review process.

Technical Explanation

The guidelines provide instructions for authors on how to properly format their responses to peer reviews of papers submitted to arXiv.

Regarding response length, the guidelines recommend that authors keep their responses relatively concise, typically around 1-2 pages. This helps ensure the reviewers can easily read and understand the main points being addressed.

For formatting, the guidelines specify that the response should be prepared using LaTeX, a typesetting language widely used in academic publishing. This includes using specific font styles, section headings, and layout formatting to maintain a consistent appearance across all author responses.

The guidelines aim to help authors present their responses in a clear and professional manner. This consistency makes it easier for reviewers to navigate the responses and focus on the substance of the authors' feedback, ultimately improving the peer review process for the entire community.

Critical Analysis

The guidelines provided in this document are reasonable and well-justified. Keeping author responses concise and formatting them consistently using LaTeX are sensible recommendations that benefit both authors and reviewers.

One potential limitation is that the guidelines may be too prescriptive, leaving little room for authors to express their responses in a unique or personalized way. However, the goal of consistency likely outweighs this concern, as it helps ensure a professional and streamlined peer review process.

Additionally, the guidelines do not address the content or substance of the author responses. While formatting is important, the actual quality and thoughtfulness of the responses are ultimately more crucial to the peer review process. The guidelines could be strengthened by also providing recommendations on how to structure and compose effective responses to reviewer comments.

Conclusion

The LaTeX Guidelines for Author Response provide a clear and helpful set of instructions for authors submitting responses to peer reviews of their papers on arXiv. By keeping responses concise and formatting them consistently using LaTeX, the guidelines aim to improve the overall peer review process by making it easier for reviewers to understand and engage with the authors' feedback.

While the guidelines could be expanded to include recommendations on the content and structure of the responses, the current focus on formatting is a reasonable approach to ensuring a professional and streamlined peer review experience for all participants.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

GeoGuide: Geometric guidance of diffusion models

Mateusz Poleski, Jacek Tabor, Przemys{l}aw Spurek

Diffusion models are among the most effective methods for image generation. This is in particular because, unlike GANs, they can be easily conditioned during training to produce elements with desired class or properties. However, guiding a pre-trained diffusion model to generate elements from previously unlabeled data is significantly more challenging. One of the possible solutions was given by the ADM-G guiding approach. Although ADM-G successfully generates elements from the given class, there is a significant quality gap compared to a model originally conditioned on this class. In particular, the FID score obtained by the ADM-G-guided diffusion model is nearly three times lower than the class-conditioned guidance. We demonstrate that this issue is partly due to ADM-G providing minimal guidance during the final stage of the denoising process. To address this problem, we propose GeoGuide, a guidance model based on tracing the distance of the diffusion model's trajectory from the data manifold. The main idea of GeoGuide is to produce normalized adjustments during the backward denoising process. As shown in the experiments, GeoGuide surpasses the probabilistic approach ADM-G with respect to both the FID scores and the quality of the generated images.

7/19/2024

Geometric-Facilitated Denoising Diffusion Model for 3D Molecule Generation

Can Xu, Haosen Wang, Weigang Wang, Pengfei Zheng, Hongyang Chen

Denoising diffusion models have shown great potential in multiple research areas. Existing diffusion-based generative methods on de novo 3D molecule generation face two major challenges. Since majority heavy atoms in molecules allow connections to multiple atoms through single bonds, solely using pair-wise distance to model molecule geometries is insufficient. Therefore, the first one involves proposing an effective neural network as the denoising kernel that is capable to capture complex multi-body interatomic relationships and learn high-quality features. Due to the discrete nature of graphs, mainstream diffusion-based methods for molecules heavily rely on predefined rules and generate edges in an indirect manner. The second challenge involves accommodating molecule generation to diffusion and accurately predicting the existence of bonds. In our research, we view the iterative way of updating molecule conformations in diffusion process is consistent with molecular dynamics and introduce a novel molecule generation method named Geometric-Facilitated Molecular Diffusion (GFMDiff). For the first challenge, we introduce a Dual-Track Transformer Network (DTN) to fully excevate global spatial relationships and learn high quality representations which contribute to accurate predictions of features and geometries. As for the second challenge, we design Geometric-Facilitated Loss (GFLoss) which intervenes the formation of bonds during the training period, instead of directly embedding edges into the latent space. Comprehensive experiments on current benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of GFMDiff.

4/23/2024

Dreamguider: Improved Training free Diffusion-based Conditional Generation

Nithin Gopalakrishnan Nair, Vishal M Patel

Diffusion models have emerged as a formidable tool for training-free conditional generation.However, a key hurdle in inference-time guidance techniques is the need for compute-heavy backpropagation through the diffusion network for estimating the guidance direction. Moreover, these techniques often require handcrafted parameter tuning on a case-by-case basis. Although some recent works have introduced minimal compute methods for linear inverse problems, a generic lightweight guidance solution to both linear and non-linear guidance problems is still missing. To this end, we propose Dreamguider, a method that enables inference-time guidance without compute-heavy backpropagation through the diffusion network. The key idea is to regulate the gradient flow through a time-varying factor. Moreover, we propose an empirical guidance scale that works for a wide variety of tasks, hence removing the need for handcrafted parameter tuning. We further introduce an effective lightweight augmentation strategy that significantly boosts the performance during inference-time guidance. We present experiments using Dreamguider on multiple tasks across multiple datasets and models to show the effectiveness of the proposed modules. To facilitate further research, we will make the code public after the review process.

6/5/2024

✅

Physics-Informed Diffusion Models

Jan-Hendrik Bastek, WaiChing Sun, Dennis M. Kochmann

Generative models such as denoising diffusion models are quickly advancing their ability to approximate highly complex data distributions. They are also increasingly leveraged in scientific machine learning, where samples from the implied data distribution are expected to adhere to specific governing equations. We present a framework to inform denoising diffusion models of underlying constraints on such generated samples during model training. Our approach improves the alignment of the generated samples with the imposed constraints and significantly outperforms existing methods without affecting inference speed. Additionally, our findings suggest that incorporating such constraints during training provides a natural regularization against overfitting. Our framework is easy to implement and versatile in its applicability for imposing equality and inequality constraints as well as auxiliary optimization objectives.

5/24/2024