Geometric ergodicity of SGLD via reflection coupling

Read original: arXiv:2301.06769 - Published 8/27/2024 by Lei Li, Jian-Guo Liu, Yuliang Wang
Total Score

0

🐍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper examines the geometric ergodicity of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm under nonconvex settings.
  • The paper proves the Wasserstein contraction of SGLD when the target distribution is log-concave only outside some compact set, using the technique of reflection coupling.
  • The paper addresses the difficulties introduced by time discretization and minibatch in SGLD when applying the reflection coupling, through careful estimates of conditional expectations.
  • The paper also establishes the geometric ergodicity of SGLD with constant step size in terms of the $W_1$ distance, and extends the results to non-gradient drifts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a machine learning algorithm called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) and how it behaves in nonconvex settings. Nonconvex settings are situations where the objective function being optimized is not a simple, smooth curve, but instead has complex shapes with multiple peaks and valleys.

The researchers used a technique called reflection coupling to prove that SGLD can effectively explore the space and converge to the correct target distribution, even when that distribution is only "log-concave" (a technical property) outside a certain region.

Applying the reflection coupling technique to SGLD was challenging because of the way SGLD works - it uses small "mini-batches" of data and discretizes time. The researchers were able to overcome these difficulties by carefully analyzing the expected values at each step.

As a result, the paper shows that SGLD with a constant step size has a well-defined "invariant distribution" that it converges to, and the researchers were able to describe how fast this convergence happens, in terms of the $W_1$ distance (another technical metric). They also extended the results to handle situations where the algorithm doesn't directly use the gradient of the objective function.

Overall, this research helps us understand when and how the SGLD algorithm can be used effectively, even in complex, nonconvex settings.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the geometric ergodicity of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm under nonconvex settings. Geometric ergodicity is a technical property that ensures the algorithm converges to the correct target distribution at an exponential rate.

The key idea is to prove the Wasserstein contraction of SGLD when the target distribution is log-concave only outside some compact set. Log-concavity is a mathematical property that generalizes the concept of convexity.

The researchers use the technique of reflection coupling to establish this contraction. Reflection coupling is a way of constructing two Markov chains that are "coupled" or connected in a specific way.

Applying reflection coupling to SGLD is challenging due to the time discretization and minibatch used in the algorithm. The researchers address these difficulties through careful estimates of conditional expectations, bounding various terms that arise in the analysis.

As a direct corollary, the paper shows that SGLD with constant step size has an invariant distribution, and the researchers are able to obtain its geometric ergodicity in terms of the $W_1$ distance, a measure of how different two probability distributions are.

Finally, the paper generalizes the results to handle non-gradient drifts, where the algorithm does not directly use the gradient of the objective function.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a significant contribution to the theoretical understanding of the SGLD algorithm, particularly in nonconvex settings. The use of reflection coupling is a powerful technique that allows the researchers to prove strong convergence guarantees, even when the target distribution is only well-behaved outside a compact set.

One potential limitation of the work is that the assumptions, such as log-concavity outside a compact set, may not always hold in real-world applications. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that extending the results to more general settings is an important direction for future research.

Additionally, the technical details involved in the proofs can be quite challenging for a general audience to follow. While the plain English explanation provided attempts to convey the key ideas, readers with a stronger mathematical background may be better equipped to fully appreciate the technical contributions of the paper.

Overall, this research represents a significant advancement in the theoretical understanding of SGLD and provides a solid foundation for further exploration of its properties and applications.

Conclusion

This paper makes important contributions to the theoretical analysis of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm, particularly in nonconvex settings. By using the technique of reflection coupling, the researchers were able to prove the Wasserstein contraction of SGLD and establish its geometric ergodicity, even when the target distribution is only well-behaved outside a compact set.

The work addresses several technical challenges introduced by the time discretization and minibatch used in SGLD, demonstrating the researchers' careful and rigorous approach. The results have implications for the effective use of SGLD in complex, nonconvex optimization problems, and the paper lays the groundwork for further exploration of the algorithm's properties and applications.

While the technical details can be demanding, the plain English explanation provided aims to make the key ideas and significance of the research accessible to a broader audience. Overall, this paper represents an important advancement in the theoretical understanding of SGLD and its potential in real-world machine learning tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

Total Score

0

Geometric ergodicity of SGLD via reflection coupling

Lei Li, Jian-Guo Liu, Yuliang Wang

We consider the geometric ergodicity of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm under nonconvexity settings. Via the technique of reflection coupling, we prove the Wasserstein contraction of SGLD when the target distribution is log-concave only outside some compact set. The time discretization and the minibatch in SGLD introduce several difficulties when applying the reflection coupling, which are addressed by a series of careful estimates of conditional expectations. As a direct corollary, the SGLD with constant step size has an invariant distribution and we are able to obtain its geometric ergodicity in terms of $W_1$ distance. The generalization to non-gradient drifts is also included.

Read more

8/27/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Langevin Dynamics: A Unified Perspective on Optimization via Lyapunov Potentials

August Y. Chen, Ayush Sekhari, Karthik Sridharan

We study the problem of non-convex optimization using Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). SGLD is a natural and popular variation of stochastic gradient descent where at each step, appropriately scaled Gaussian noise is added. To our knowledge, the only strategy for showing global convergence of SGLD on the loss function is to show that SGLD can sample from a stationary distribution which assigns larger mass when the function is small (the Gibbs measure), and then to convert these guarantees to optimization results. We employ a new strategy to analyze the convergence of SGLD to global minima, based on Lyapunov potentials and optimization. We convert the same mild conditions from previous works on SGLD into geometric properties based on Lyapunov potentials. This adapts well to the case with a stochastic gradient oracle, which is natural for machine learning applications where one wants to minimize population loss but only has access to stochastic gradients via minibatch training samples. Here we provide 1) improved rates in the setting of previous works studying SGLD for optimization, 2) the first finite gradient complexity guarantee for SGLD where the function is Lipschitz and the Gibbs measure defined by the function satisfies a Poincar'e Inequality, and 3) prove if continuous-time Langevin Dynamics succeeds for optimization, then discrete-time SGLD succeeds under mild regularity assumptions.

Read more

7/8/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Constrained Exploration via Reflected Replica Exchange Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics

Haoyang Zheng, Hengrong Du, Qi Feng, Wei Deng, Guang Lin

Replica exchange stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (reSGLD) is an effective sampler for non-convex learning in large-scale datasets. However, the simulation may encounter stagnation issues when the high-temperature chain delves too deeply into the distribution tails. To tackle this issue, we propose reflected reSGLD (r2SGLD): an algorithm tailored for constrained non-convex exploration by utilizing reflection steps within a bounded domain. Theoretically, we observe that reducing the diameter of the domain enhances mixing rates, exhibiting a $textit{quadratic}$ behavior. Empirically, we test its performance through extensive experiments, including identifying dynamical systems with physical constraints, simulations of constrained multi-modal distributions, and image classification tasks. The theoretical and empirical findings highlight the crucial role of constrained exploration in improving the simulation efficiency.

Read more

6/4/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Subsampling Error in Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusions

Kexin Jin, Chenguang Liu, Jonas Latz

The Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) are popularly used to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions in statistical learning procedures with large-scale data. As opposed to many usual Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, SGLD is not stationary with respect to the posterior distribution; two sources of error appear: The first error is introduced by an Euler--Maruyama discretisation of a Langevin diffusion process, the second error comes from the data subsampling that enables its use in large-scale data settings. In this work, we consider an idealised version of SGLD to analyse the method's pure subsampling error that we then see as a best-case error for diffusion-based subsampling MCMC methods. Indeed, we introduce and study the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff), a continuous-time Markov process that follows the Langevin diffusion corresponding to a data subset and switches this data subset after exponential waiting times. There, we show the exponential ergodicity of SLGDiff and that the Wasserstein distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff is bounded above by a fractional power of the mean waiting time. We bring our results into context with other analyses of SGLD.

Read more

4/30/2024