Subsampling Error in Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusions
2305.13882
0
0
⛏️
Abstract
The Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) are popularly used to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions in statistical learning procedures with large-scale data. As opposed to many usual Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, SGLD is not stationary with respect to the posterior distribution; two sources of error appear: The first error is introduced by an Euler--Maruyama discretisation of a Langevin diffusion process, the second error comes from the data subsampling that enables its use in large-scale data settings. In this work, we consider an idealised version of SGLD to analyse the method's pure subsampling error that we then see as a best-case error for diffusion-based subsampling MCMC methods. Indeed, we introduce and study the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff), a continuous-time Markov process that follows the Langevin diffusion corresponding to a data subset and switches this data subset after exponential waiting times. There, we show the exponential ergodicity of SLGDiff and that the Wasserstein distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff is bounded above by a fractional power of the mean waiting time. We bring our results into context with other analyses of SGLD.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) method, which is commonly used to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions in statistical learning with large-scale data.
- SGLD introduces two sources of error: one from discretizing the Langevin diffusion process, and another from data subsampling to enable use with large-scale data.
- The authors introduce and analyze an idealized version called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff), which focuses only on the subsampling error as a best-case analysis for diffusion-based subsampling MCMC methods.
- The paper shows the exponential ergodicity of SGLDiff and that the Wasserstein distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff is bounded by a fractional power of the mean waiting time.
Plain English Explanation
Bayesian methods are powerful for statistical learning, but can be computationally challenging, especially with large datasets. The Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm is a popular way to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions in these cases.
SGLD works by simulating a noisy version of the Langevin diffusion process, which samples from the target posterior distribution. However, SGLD has two main sources of error: one from the numerical approximation of the diffusion process, and another from only using a subset of the data at each step to make computations faster.
In this paper, the authors look at an idealized version of SGLD called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff) that focuses just on the subsampling error, without the discretization error. This gives a best-case analysis for the performance of diffusion-based MCMC methods that use subsampling.
The authors show that SGLDiff is exponentially ergodic, meaning it will converge quickly to the target posterior distribution. They also bound the distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff, showing it is controlled by the mean time between switching the data subsample. This provides insight into the subsampling error in SGLD and related algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The authors consider an idealized version of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff). Unlike SGLD, which introduces errors from both discretizing the underlying Langevin diffusion process and from subsampling the data, SGLDiff only focuses on the subsampling error as a best-case analysis for diffusion-based subsampling MCMC methods.
SGLDiff is a continuous-time Markov process that follows the Langevin diffusion corresponding to a data subset, and switches this data subset after exponential waiting times. The authors show that SGLDiff is exponentially ergodic, meaning it converges exponentially fast to its stationary distribution. They also bound the Wasserstein distance between the posterior distribution and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff, showing it is controlled by a fractional power of the mean waiting time between switching data subsets.
This analysis provides insights into the subsampling error in SGLD and related algorithms that use data subsampling, such as 3D Gaussian Splatting as Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Penalized Overdamped and Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms, Error Bounds for Particle Gradient Descent and Extensions, Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right, and Learning Mixtures of Gaussians Using Diffusion Models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the subsampling error in Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) and related algorithms. By introducing the idealized SGLDiff process, the authors are able to isolate and bound the subsampling error, which is a useful contribution to understanding the performance of these methods.
However, the analysis is restricted to the idealized SGLDiff process, and does not directly address the full SGLD algorithm, which has additional discretization error. While the authors note this limitation, it would be helpful to understand how the subsampling error analyzed here relates to the overall error in SGLD.
Additionally, the paper focuses on theoretical bounds and ergodicity properties, but does not provide empirical evaluation of SGLDiff or comparison to SGLD. Experimental results demonstrating the tightness of the bounds or the practical implications of the analysis would strengthen the impact of the work.
Finally, the analysis assumes certain technical conditions, such as the target distribution satisfying log-Sobolev and log-Harnack inequalities. It would be valuable to understand how robust the results are to relaxing these assumptions or considering other classes of target distributions.
Overall, this is a technically solid paper that provides important theoretical insights into the subsampling error in SGLD and related algorithms. Further empirical validation and exploration of the practical implications would help bridge the gap between the theoretical analysis and real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper examines an idealized version of the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) algorithm, called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff), to analyze the subsampling error that arises when using only a subset of data to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions.
The authors show that SGLDiff is exponentially ergodic and bound the Wasserstein distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff, demonstrating that this distance is controlled by a fractional power of the mean waiting time between switching data subsets. This provides valuable insights into the subsampling error in SGLD and related algorithms that use data subsampling to enable scalable Bayesian inference.
While the analysis is restricted to the idealized SGLDiff process, the results offer a best-case understanding of the subsampling error that can inform the design and application of these types of stochastic gradient MCMC methods. Further empirical evaluation and exploration of relaxing the technical assumptions would help bridge the gap between the theoretical analysis and practical usage.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Robust Approximate Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Barker Dynamics
Lorenzo Mauri, Giacomo Zanella
0
0
Stochastic Gradient (SG) Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms (MCMC) are popular algorithms for Bayesian sampling in the presence of large datasets. However, they come with little theoretical guarantees and assessing their empirical performances is non-trivial. In such context, it is crucial to develop algorithms that are robust to the choice of hyperparameters and to gradients heterogeneity since, in practice, both the choice of step-size and behaviour of target gradients induce hard-to-control biases in the invariant distribution. In this work we introduce the stochastic gradient Barker dynamics (SGBD) algorithm, extending the recently developed Barker MCMC scheme, a robust alternative to Langevin-based sampling algorithms, to the stochastic gradient framework. We characterize the impact of stochastic gradients on the Barker transition mechanism and develop a bias-corrected version that, under suitable assumptions, eliminates the error due to the gradient noise in the proposal. We illustrate the performance on a number of high-dimensional examples, showing that SGBD is more robust to hyperparameter tuning and to irregular behavior of the target gradients compared to the popular stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics algorithm.
5/16/2024
New!Stochastic Gradient Piecewise Deterministic Monte Carlo Samplers
Paul Fearnhead, Sebastiano Grazzi, Chris Nemeth, Gareth O. Roberts
0
0
Recent work has suggested using Monte Carlo methods based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) to sample from target distributions of interest. PDMPs are non-reversible continuous-time processes endowed with momentum, and hence can mix better than standard reversible MCMC samplers. Furthermore, they can incorporate exact sub-sampling schemes which only require access to a single (randomly selected) data point at each iteration, yet without introducing bias to the algorithm's stationary distribution. However, the range of models for which PDMPs can be used, particularly with sub-sampling, is limited. We propose approximate simulation of PDMPs with sub-sampling for scalable sampling from posterior distributions. The approximation takes the form of an Euler approximation to the true PDMP dynamics, and involves using an estimate of the gradient of the log-posterior based on a data sub-sample. We thus call this class of algorithms stochastic-gradient PDMPs. Importantly, the trajectories of stochastic-gradient PDMPs are continuous and can leverage recent ideas for sampling from measures with continuous and atomic components. We show these methods are easy to implement, present results on their approximation error and demonstrate numerically that this class of algorithms has similar efficiency to, but is more robust than, stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics.
6/28/2024
🏅
Sampling and estimation on manifolds using the Langevin diffusion
Karthik Bharath, Alexander Lewis, Akash Sharma, Michael V Tretyakov
0
0
Error bounds are derived for sampling and estimation using a discretization of an intrinsically defined Langevin diffusion with invariant measure $text{d}mu_phi propto e^{-phi} mathrm{dvol}_g $ on a compact Riemannian manifold. Two estimators of linear functionals of $mu_phi $ based on the discretized Markov process are considered: a time-averaging estimator based on a single trajectory and an ensemble-averaging estimator based on multiple independent trajectories. Imposing no restrictions beyond a nominal level of smoothness on $phi$, first-order error bounds, in discretization step size, on the bias and variance/mean-square error of both estimators are derived. The order of error matches the optimal rate in Euclidean and flat spaces, and leads to a first-order bound on distance between the invariant measure $mu_phi$ and a stationary measure of the discretized Markov process. This order is preserved even upon using retractions when exponential maps are unavailable in closed form, thus enhancing practicality of the proposed algorithms. Generality of the proof techniques, which exploit links between two partial differential equations and the semigroup of operators corresponding to the Langevin diffusion, renders them amenable for the study of a more general class of sampling algorithms related to the Langevin diffusion. Conditions for extending analysis to the case of non-compact manifolds are discussed. Numerical illustrations with distributions, log-concave and otherwise, on the manifolds of positive and negative curvature elucidate on the derived bounds and demonstrate practical utility of the sampling algorithm.
6/18/2024
Diffusion models for Gaussian distributions: Exact solutions and Wasserstein errors
Emile Pierret, Bruno Galerne
0
0
Diffusion or score-based models recently showed high performance in image generation. They rely on a forward and a backward stochastic differential equations (SDE). The sampling of a data distribution is achieved by solving numerically the backward SDE or its associated flow ODE. Studying the convergence of these models necessitates to control four different types of error: the initialization error, the truncation error, the discretization and the score approximation. In this paper, we study theoretically the behavior of diffusion models and their numerical implementation when the data distribution is Gaussian. In this restricted framework where the score function is a linear operator, we can derive the analytical solutions of the forward and backward SDEs as well as the associated flow ODE. This provides exact expressions for various Wasserstein errors which enable us to compare the influence of each error type for any sampling scheme, thus allowing to monitor convergence directly in the data space instead of relying on Inception features. Our experiments show that the recommended numerical schemes from the diffusion models literature are also the best sampling schemes for Gaussian distributions.
6/13/2024