A Geometric Framework for Adversarial Vulnerability in Machine Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.11029 - Published 7/17/2024 by Brian Bell
Total Score

0

A Geometric Framework for Adversarial Vulnerability in Machine Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the high-dimensional geometry and statistical properties of adversarial training for deep neural networks.
  • The authors investigate how the structure of the problem space affects the vulnerability of neural networks to adversarial attacks.
  • They present a framework for analyzing the compositional curvature bounds of deep neural networks and its implications for adversarial robustness.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on understanding why deep neural networks are so vulnerable to adversarial attacks - situations where small, carefully crafted changes to the input can cause the network to make incorrect predictions. The researchers examine the high-dimensional geometry and statistical properties of the training process, known as "adversarial training," which aims to make models more robust to these attacks.

By analyzing the structure of the problem space - the set of all possible inputs the network might encounter - the authors develop a framework for understanding the fundamental limits of adversarial robustness. They show that the curvature, or "bumpiness," of the network's decision boundaries plays a crucial role in determining its vulnerability to adversarial perturbations. Link to "Compositional Curvature Bounds for Deep Neural Networks"

The insights from this research could help guide the development of more robust and reliable deep learning models, which is an important challenge in the field of adversarial machine learning. By understanding the fundamental limits of adversarial robustness, researchers can work towards building AI systems that are more resistant to malicious attacks and can be deployed safely in high-stakes applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical framework for analyzing the high-dimensional geometry and statistical properties of adversarial training in deep neural networks. The authors investigate how the structure of the problem space, which encompasses all possible inputs the network might encounter, affects the network's vulnerability to adversarial attacks.

Specifically, the researchers develop a set of tools for studying the compositional curvature bounds of deep neural networks. Link to "Towards Unlocking the Mystery of Adversarial Fragility in Neural Networks" This curvature metric captures the "bumpiness" of the network's decision boundaries, which is a key factor in determining its robustness to adversarial perturbations.

Through a series of experiments and analyses, the authors demonstrate how the structure of the problem space, such as the intrinsic dimensionality of the data manifold, can significantly impact the effectiveness of adversarial training. Link to "Problem Space Structural Adversarial Attacks on Network Intrusion Detection" They also explore the connections between adversarial robustness, the geometric properties of the decision boundaries, and the statistical properties of the training data.

The insights from this work contribute to a deeper understanding of the fundamental limits of adversarial robustness in deep learning, which is a crucial challenge in the field of adversarial machine learning. By shedding light on the role of problem space structure and curvature in adversarial vulnerability, the research can inform the development of more robust and reliable deep learning models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable theoretical framework for analyzing the high-dimensional geometry and statistical properties of adversarial training in deep neural networks. The authors' focus on the structure of the problem space and the role of curvature in determining adversarial robustness is a novel and insightful approach.

However, the paper does not address some important practical considerations. For example, the analysis is primarily conducted in a controlled, theoretical setting, and it's unclear how well the findings would translate to real-world, high-stakes applications where adversarial attacks are a significant concern, such as autonomous systems or medical image analysis.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of this research, such as how it could be used to create more trustworthy and reliable AI systems. Link to "Adversarial Attacks on the Dimensionality of Text Classifiers" Further discussion on the ethical considerations and potential misuse of these techniques would have been valuable.

Overall, the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial attacks, but more work is needed to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to consider the broader implications of this research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for analyzing the high-dimensional geometry and statistical properties of adversarial training in deep neural networks. By focusing on the structure of the problem space and the role of curvature in determining adversarial robustness, the authors offer valuable insights into the fundamental limits of adversarial resilience.

The findings from this research could inform the development of more robust and reliable deep learning models, which is a crucial challenge in the field of adversarial machine learning. By better understanding the geometric and statistical properties that contribute to a network's vulnerability, researchers can work towards building AI systems that are more resistant to malicious attacks and can be safely deployed in high-stakes applications.

However, the paper also highlights the need for further work to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to consider the broader societal implications of this research. Continued progress in this area could have significant implications for the development of trustworthy and responsible AI systems that can be deployed with confidence in a wide range of real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Geometric Framework for Adversarial Vulnerability in Machine Learning
Total Score

0

A Geometric Framework for Adversarial Vulnerability in Machine Learning

Brian Bell

This work starts with the intention of using mathematics to understand the intriguing vulnerability observed by ~citet{szegedy2013} within artificial neural networks. Along the way, we will develop some novel tools with applications far outside of just the adversarial domain. We will do this while developing a rigorous mathematical framework to examine this problem. Our goal is to build out theory which can support increasingly sophisticated conjecture about adversarial attacks with a particular focus on the so called ``Dimpled Manifold Hypothesis'' by ~citet{shamir2021dimpled}. Chapter one will cover the history and architecture of neural network architectures. Chapter two is focused on the background of adversarial vulnerability. Starting from the seminal paper by ~citet{szegedy2013} we will develop the theory of adversarial perturbation and attack. Chapter three will build a theory of persistence that is related to Ricci Curvature, which can be used to measure properties of decision boundaries. We will use this foundation to make a conjecture relating adversarial attacks. Chapters four and five represent a sudden and wonderful digression that examines an intriguing related body of theory for spatial analysis of neural networks as approximations of kernel machines and becomes a novel theory for representing neural networks with bilinear maps. These heavily mathematical chapters will set up a framework and begin exploring applications of what may become a very important theoretical foundation for analyzing neural network learning with spatial and geometric information. We will conclude by setting up our new methods to address the conjecture from chapter 3 in continuing research.

Read more

7/17/2024

📈

Total Score

0

A High Dimensional Statistical Model for Adversarial Training: Geometry and Trade-Offs

Kasimir Tanner, Matteo Vilucchio, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala

This work investigates adversarial training in the context of margin-based linear classifiers in the high-dimensional regime where the dimension $d$ and the number of data points $n$ diverge with a fixed ratio $alpha = n / d$. We introduce a tractable mathematical model where the interplay between the data and adversarial attacker geometries can be studied, while capturing the core phenomenology observed in the adversarial robustness literature. Our main theoretical contribution is an exact asymptotic description of the sufficient statistics for the adversarial empirical risk minimiser, under generic convex and non-increasing losses. Our result allow us to precisely characterise which directions in the data are associated with a higher generalisation/robustness trade-off, as defined by a robustness and a usefulness metric. In particular, we unveil the existence of directions which can be defended without penalising accuracy. Finally, we show the advantage of defending non-robust features during training, identifying a uniform protection as an inherently effective defence mechanism.

Read more

6/11/2024

Problem space structural adversarial attacks for Network Intrusion Detection Systems based on Graph Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Problem space structural adversarial attacks for Network Intrusion Detection Systems based on Graph Neural Networks

Andrea Venturi, Dario Stabili, Mirco Marchetti

Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have become increasingly popular for supporting Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). Nevertheless, extensive research has shown their vulnerability to adversarial attacks, which involve subtle perturbations to the inputs of the models aimed at compromising their performance. Recent proposals have effectively leveraged Graph Neural Networks (GNN) to produce predictions based also on the structural patterns exhibited by intrusions to enhance the detection robustness. However, the adoption of GNN-based NIDS introduces new types of risks. In this paper, we propose the first formalization of adversarial attacks specifically tailored for GNN in network intrusion detection. Moreover, we outline and model the problem space constraints that attackers need to consider to carry out feasible structural attacks in real-world scenarios. As a final contribution, we conduct an extensive experimental campaign in which we launch the proposed attacks against state-of-the-art GNN-based NIDS. Our findings demonstrate the increased robustness of the models against classical feature-based adversarial attacks, while highlighting their susceptibility to structure-based attacks.

Read more

4/24/2024

Towards unlocking the mystery of adversarial fragility of neural networks
Total Score

0

Towards unlocking the mystery of adversarial fragility of neural networks

Jingchao Gao, Raghu Mudumbai, Xiaodong Wu, Jirong Yi, Catherine Xu, Hui Xie, Weiyu Xu

In this paper, we study the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks for classification tasks. We look at the smallest magnitude of possible additive perturbations that can change the output of a classification algorithm. We provide a matrix-theoretic explanation of the adversarial fragility of deep neural network for classification. In particular, our theoretical results show that neural network's adversarial robustness can degrade as the input dimension $d$ increases. Analytically we show that neural networks' adversarial robustness can be only $1/sqrt{d}$ of the best possible adversarial robustness. Our matrix-theoretic explanation is consistent with an earlier information-theoretic feature-compression-based explanation for the adversarial fragility of neural networks.

Read more

6/26/2024