Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression through Stochastic Approximate Gradients
2402.05639
0
0
↗️
Abstract
Instrumental variables (IVs) provide a powerful strategy for identifying causal effects in the presence of unobservable confounders. Within the nonparametric setting (NPIV), recent methods have been based on nonlinear generalizations of Two-Stage Least Squares and on minimax formulations derived from moment conditions or duality. In a novel direction, we show how to formulate a functional stochastic gradient descent algorithm to tackle NPIV regression by directly minimizing the populational risk. We provide theoretical support in the form of bounds on the excess risk, and conduct numerical experiments showcasing our method's superior stability and competitive performance relative to current state-of-the-art alternatives. This algorithm enables flexible estimator choices, such as neural networks or kernel based methods, as well as non-quadratic loss functions, which may be suitable for structural equations beyond the setting of continuous outcomes and additive noise. Finally, we demonstrate this flexibility of our framework by presenting how it naturally addresses the important case of binary outcomes, which has received far less attention by recent developments in the NPIV literature.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Instrumental variables (IVs) are a powerful tool for identifying causal effects when there are unobservable confounding factors.
- Recent methods for nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) regression have used nonlinear generalizations of Two-Stage Least Squares and minimax formulations.
- This paper presents a novel functional stochastic gradient descent algorithm to directly minimize the populational risk in NPIV regression.
- The algorithm provides theoretical guarantees and shows superior stability and performance compared to existing methods.
- The flexible framework can accommodate various estimator choices and loss functions, including for binary outcomes which have received less attention in NPIV literature.
Plain English Explanation
Determining the causal impact of one factor on another can be challenging, especially when there are hidden or unmeasured influences at play. Instrumental variables (IVs) provide a clever way to address this problem. IVs are variables that are correlated with the factor you're interested in, but don't directly affect the outcome you're trying to predict.
This paper focuses on a specific type of IV regression called nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) regression. Recent NPIV methods have used complex mathematical techniques like nonlinear generalizations of Two-Stage Least Squares and minimax formulations.
The authors of this paper introduce a new approach - a functional stochastic gradient descent algorithm that directly minimizes the overall "risk" or error in NPIV regression. This algorithm has several advantages:
- It comes with theoretical guarantees about its performance.
- It is more stable and performs better than current state-of-the-art NPIV methods.
- It is very flexible - it can use different types of machine learning models (like neural networks or kernel methods) and handle non-standard outcome variables (like binary outcomes).
This flexibility is important because NPIV regression has typically focused on continuous outcomes with additive noise. The authors show how their framework can naturally handle binary outcomes, which is an important but underexplored area in NPIV literature.
Technical Explanation
The authors present a novel functional stochastic gradient descent (FSGD) algorithm for tackling nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) regression. NPIV provides a way to identify causal effects in the presence of unobservable confounding factors, and recent methods have used nonlinear generalizations of Two-Stage Least Squares (Liao & Jiang, 2020) as well as minimax formulations derived from moment conditions or duality (Singh et al., 2019, Shi et al., 2020).
In contrast, the authors' FSGD algorithm directly minimizes the populational risk in NPIV regression. This approach provides theoretical guarantees in the form of bounds on the excess risk. Numerical experiments show that the FSGD algorithm exhibits superior stability and competitive performance relative to current state-of-the-art NPIV methods.
A key advantage of the FSGD framework is its flexibility. It can accommodate various estimator choices, such as neural networks or kernel-based methods, as well as non-quadratic loss functions. This broadens the applicability of NPIV regression beyond the typical setting of continuous outcomes and additive noise.
The authors demonstrate this flexibility by presenting how their framework naturally addresses the important case of binary outcomes, which has received less attention in the NPIV literature. By formulating NPIV regression for binary outcomes, the authors showcase the versatility and broader impact of their proposed algorithm.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis of their FSGD algorithm for NPIV regression, including bounds on the excess risk. This gives users confidence in the algorithm's performance guarantees.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For example, the algorithm's sensitivity to the choice of hyperparameters or the impact of misspecified instruments is not explored in depth.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the algorithm's flexibility in handling binary outcomes, they do not provide a comprehensive comparison to other methods specifically designed for non-continuous outcomes in the NPIV setting. Further empirical evaluation in this regard could strengthen the claims about the algorithm's advantages.
Overall, the research presents a promising new direction for NPIV regression, but additional investigation into the algorithm's robustness, limitations, and comparison to specialized methods for non-standard outcome variables would enhance the critical analysis.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel functional stochastic gradient descent (FSGD) algorithm for nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) regression. NPIV is a powerful technique for identifying causal effects in the presence of unobservable confounders, and the authors' FSGD approach provides theoretical guarantees and superior empirical performance compared to existing NPIV methods.
A key strength of the FSGD algorithm is its flexibility, allowing for a wide range of estimator choices and loss functions. The authors demonstrate how this framework can naturally handle the important case of binary outcomes, which has received less attention in the NPIV literature.
By providing a new, efficient, and versatile tool for NPIV regression, this research advances the field and opens up opportunities for broader applications of causal inference techniques, particularly in areas where the outcome variable may not be continuous. Further exploration of the algorithm's robustness and comparison to specialized methods could strengthen the critical analysis, but overall, this work represents an important contribution to the NPIV literature.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Stochastic Optimization Algorithms for Instrumental Variable Regression with Streaming Data
Xuxing Chen, Abhishek Roy, Yifan Hu, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
0
0
We develop and analyze algorithms for instrumental variable regression by viewing the problem as a conditional stochastic optimization problem. In the context of least-squares instrumental variable regression, our algorithms neither require matrix inversions nor mini-batches and provides a fully online approach for performing instrumental variable regression with streaming data. When the true model is linear, we derive rates of convergence in expectation, that are of order $mathcal{O}(log T/T)$ and $mathcal{O}(1/T^{1-iota})$ for any $iota>0$, respectively under the availability of two-sample and one-sample oracles, respectively, where $T$ is the number of iterations. Importantly, under the availability of the two-sample oracle, our procedure avoids explicitly modeling and estimating the relationship between confounder and the instrumental variables, demonstrating the benefit of the proposed approach over recent works based on reformulating the problem as minimax optimization problems. Numerical experiments are provided to corroborate the theoretical results.
5/31/2024
Geometry-Aware Instrumental Variable Regression
Heiner Kremer, Bernhard Scholkopf
0
0
Instrumental variable (IV) regression can be approached through its formulation in terms of conditional moment restrictions (CMR). Building on variants of the generalized method of moments, most CMR estimators are implicitly based on approximating the population data distribution via reweightings of the empirical sample. While for large sample sizes, in the independent identically distributed (IID) setting, reweightings can provide sufficient flexibility, they might fail to capture the relevant information in presence of corrupted data or data prone to adversarial attacks. To address these shortcomings, we propose the Sinkhorn Method of Moments, an optimal transport-based IV estimator that takes into account the geometry of the data manifold through data-derivative information. We provide a simple plug-and-play implementation of our method that performs on par with related estimators in standard settings but improves robustness against data corruption and adversarial attacks.
5/21/2024
Learning Decision Policies with Instrumental Variables through Double Machine Learning
Daqian Shao, Ashkan Soleymani, Francesco Quinzan, Marta Kwiatkowska
0
0
A common issue in learning decision-making policies in data-rich settings is spurious correlations in the offline dataset, which can be caused by hidden confounders. Instrumental variable (IV) regression, which utilises a key unconfounded variable known as the instrument, is a standard technique for learning causal relationships between confounded action, outcome, and context variables. Most recent IV regression algorithms use a two-stage approach, where a deep neural network (DNN) estimator learnt in the first stage is directly plugged into the second stage, in which another DNN is used to estimate the causal effect. Naively plugging the estimator can cause heavy bias in the second stage, especially when regularisation bias is present in the first stage estimator. We propose DML-IV, a non-linear IV regression method that reduces the bias in two-stage IV regressions and effectively learns high-performing policies. We derive a novel learning objective to reduce bias and design the DML-IV algorithm following the double/debiased machine learning (DML) framework. The learnt DML-IV estimator has strong convergence rate and $O(N^{-1/2})$ suboptimality guarantees that match those when the dataset is unconfounded. DML-IV outperforms state-of-the-art IV regression methods on IV regression benchmarks and learns high-performing policies in the presence of instruments.
5/16/2024
Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments
David S. Watson, Jordan Penn, Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia Bravo-Hermsdorff, Afsaneh Mastouri, Ricardo Silva
0
0
Instrumental variables (IVs) are a popular and powerful tool for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, classical approaches rely on strong assumptions such as the $textit{exclusion criterion}$, which states that instrumental effects must be entirely mediated by treatments. This assumption often fails in practice. When IV methods are improperly applied to data that do not meet the exclusion criterion, estimated causal effects may be badly biased. In this work, we propose a novel solution that provides $textit{partial}$ identification in linear systems given a set of $textit{leaky instruments}$, which are allowed to violate the exclusion criterion to some limited degree. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage, and implement inference procedures to quantify the uncertainty of resulting estimates. We demonstrate our method in a set of experiments with simulated data, where it performs favorably against the state of the art. An accompanying $texttt{R}$ package, $texttt{leakyIV}$, is available from $texttt{CRAN}$.
5/9/2024