Geometry-Informed Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2402.14009 - Published 5/28/2024 by Arturs Berzins, Andreas Radler, Sebastian Sanokowski, Sepp Hochreiter, Johannes Brandstetter
Total Score

0

Geometry-Informed Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of geometry-informed neural networks, which incorporate geometric principles and constraints into the neural network architecture to improve performance on various tasks.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across several applications, including time series forecasting, geometric figure classification, and vision-language understanding.
  • The paper also introduces novel techniques, such as spatial invariance activation and generative medial abstractions for 3D shape synthesis, which leverage geometric principles to enhance the capabilities of neural networks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new approach to building neural networks that takes into account the underlying geometry or structure of the problem at hand. Instead of treating neural networks as black boxes, the researchers incorporate geometric principles and constraints directly into the network architecture.

For example, in the case of time series forecasting, the researchers found that by incorporating the geometric properties of the time series data, such as periodicity or trends, the neural network could make more accurate predictions. Similarly, for classifying geometric shapes, the network was able to learn and leverage the inherent geometric properties of the shapes to improve its performance.

The key idea is that by explicitly modeling the geometry of the problem, the neural network can better capture the underlying patterns and relationships in the data, leading to improved performance on a variety of tasks. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this geometry-informed approach across several applications, showcasing its versatility and potential for advancing the state of the art in areas like computer vision, natural language processing, and time series analysis.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of geometry-informed neural networks, which are neural networks that incorporate geometric principles and constraints into their architecture. This is achieved through a variety of techniques, including:

  1. Theory-informed learning: The authors propose a framework for incorporating domain knowledge, in the form of geometric theories, directly into the neural network's objective function and training process. This allows the network to learn representations that are better aligned with the underlying geometric structure of the problem.

  2. Spatial invariance activation: The researchers develop a novel activation function that encourages the neural network to learn spatially invariant representations, which can improve performance on tasks that involve geometric transformations, such as object recognition.

  3. Generative medial abstractions for 3D shape synthesis: The paper introduces a generative model that learns to synthesize 3D shapes by capturing their medial representations, which are based on the geometric properties of the shapes. This approach allows for more efficient and intuitive 3D shape generation.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of these geometry-informed techniques across a range of applications, including time series forecasting, geometric figure classification, and vision-language understanding. The results show that incorporating geometric principles into the neural network architecture can lead to significant performance improvements compared to traditional, geometry-agnostic approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the benefits of geometry-informed neural networks, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Complexity and generalization: The authors note that the geometry-informed techniques introduced in the paper can increase the complexity of the neural network architecture, which may impact its ability to generalize to new, unseen data. Striking the right balance between incorporating geometric constraints and maintaining model simplicity is an important challenge.

  2. Data and computational requirements: Some of the geometry-informed techniques, such as the generative medial abstractions for 3D shape synthesis, may require large-scale datasets and significant computational resources. Ensuring the scalability and practical applicability of these methods is an area for further investigation.

  3. Interpretability and explainability: While the geometry-informed approach can lead to performance improvements, the resulting neural networks may be more difficult to interpret and explain, as the geometric constraints and principles are embedded within the network architecture. Developing more transparent and interpretable geometry-informed models is a potential direction for future research.

Overall, the paper presents a compelling and innovative approach to building neural networks that leverage geometric principles and constraints. The demonstrated performance gains across diverse applications suggest that geometry-informed neural networks hold significant promise for advancing the state of the art in various domains. However, the challenges highlighted in the critical analysis indicate that there is still room for further research and refinement of these techniques.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the concept of geometry-informed neural networks, which incorporate geometric principles and constraints into the neural network architecture to improve performance on a variety of tasks. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across several applications, including time series forecasting, geometric figure classification, and vision-language understanding.

The key contributions of the paper are the introduction of novel techniques, such as theory-informed learning, spatial invariance activation, and generative medial abstractions for 3D shape synthesis, all of which leverage geometric principles to enhance the capabilities of neural networks. The results show that by explicitly modeling the geometry of the problem, neural networks can better capture the underlying patterns and relationships in the data, leading to significant performance improvements.

While the paper presents a compelling case for the benefits of geometry-informed neural networks, it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research, such as complexity, generalization, data and computational requirements, and interpretability. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for the practical application and widespread adoption of this innovative approach.

Overall, the work presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of neural network research, highlighting the potential of incorporating geometric principles and constraints to advance the state of the art in areas like computer vision, natural language processing, and time series analysis.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Geometry-Informed Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Geometry-Informed Neural Networks

Arturs Berzins, Andreas Radler, Sebastian Sanokowski, Sepp Hochreiter, Johannes Brandstetter

Geometry is a ubiquitous language of computer graphics, design, and engineering. However, the lack of large shape datasets limits the application of state-of-the-art supervised learning methods and motivates the exploration of alternative learning strategies. To this end, we introduce geometry-informed neural networks (GINNs) to train shape generative models emph{without any data}. GINNs combine (i) learning under constraints, (ii) neural fields as a suitable representation, and (iii) generating diverse solutions to under-determined problems. We apply GINNs to several two and three-dimensional problems of increasing levels of complexity. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of training shape generative models in a data-free setting. This new paradigm opens several exciting research directions, expanding the application of generative models into domains where data is sparse.

Read more

5/28/2024

Edge-Wise Graph-Instructed Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Edge-Wise Graph-Instructed Neural Networks

Francesco Della Santa, Antonio Mastropietro, Sandra Pieraccini, Francesco Vaccarino

The problem of multi-task regression over graph nodes has been recently approached through Graph-Instructed Neural Network (GINN), which is a promising architecture belonging to the subset of message-passing graph neural networks. In this work, we discuss the limitations of the Graph-Instructed (GI) layer, and we formalize a novel edge-wise GI (EWGI) layer. We discuss the advantages of the EWGI layer and we provide numerical evidence that EWGINNs perform better than GINNs over graph-structured input data with chaotic connectivity, like the ones inferred from the Erdos-R'enyi graph.

Read more

9/14/2024

GradINN: Gradient Informed Neural Network
Total Score

0

GradINN: Gradient Informed Neural Network

Filippo Aglietti, Francesco Della Santa, Andrea Piano, Virginia Aglietti

We propose Gradient Informed Neural Networks (GradINNs), a methodology inspired by Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that can be used to efficiently approximate a wide range of physical systems for which the underlying governing equations are completely unknown or cannot be defined, a condition that is often met in complex engineering problems. GradINNs leverage prior beliefs about a system's gradient to constrain the predicted function's gradient across all input dimensions. This is achieved using two neural networks: one modeling the target function and an auxiliary network expressing prior beliefs, e.g., smoothness. A customized loss function enables training the first network while enforcing gradient constraints derived from the auxiliary network. We demonstrate the advantages of GradINNs, particularly in low-data regimes, on diverse problems spanning non time-dependent systems (Friedman function, Stokes Flow) and time-dependent systems (Lotka-Volterra, Burger's equation). Experimental results showcase strong performance compared to standard neural networks and PINN-like approaches across all tested scenarios.

Read more

9/4/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

On the Completeness of Invariant Geometric Deep Learning Models

Zian Li, Xiyuan Wang, Shijia Kang, Muhan Zhang

Invariant models, one important class of geometric deep learning models, are capable of generating meaningful geometric representations by leveraging informative geometric features in point clouds. These models are characterized by their simplicity, good experimental results and computational efficiency. However, their theoretical expressive power still remains unclear, restricting a deeper understanding of the potential of such models. In this work, we concentrate on characterizing the theoretical expressiveness of a wide range of invariant models. We first rigorously bound the expressiveness of the most classic invariant model, message-passing neural networks incorporating distance (DisGNN), restricting its unidentifiable cases to be only highly symmetric point clouds. We then show that GeoNGNN, the geometric counterpart of one of the simplest subgraph graph neural networks (subgraph GNNs), can effectively break these corner cases' symmetry and thus achieve E(3)-completeness. By leveraging GeoNGNN as a theoretical tool, we further prove that: 1) most subgraph GNNs developed in traditional graph learning can be seamlessly extended to geometric scenarios with E(3)-completeness; 2) DimeNet, GemNet and SphereNet, three well-established invariant models, are also all capable of achieving E(3)-completeness. Our theoretical results fill the gap in the theoretical power of invariant models, contributing to a rigorous and comprehensive understanding of their capabilities. We also empirically evaluated GeoNGNN, the simplest model within the large E(3)-complete family we established, which achieves competitive results to models relying on high-order invariant/equivariant representations on molecule-relevant tasks.

Read more

7/9/2024