A Good Bot Always Knows Its Limitations: Assessing Autonomous System Decision-making Competencies through Factorized Machine Self-confidence
0
✅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a framework for quantifying the autonomy of an agent acting in a given context to accomplish some outcome.
- Proposes a model that captures the agent's decision-making process and the factors influencing its behavior.
- Aims to provide a systematic way to measure the level of autonomy exhibited by an agent in complex, real-world scenarios.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a framework for quantifying autonomy - the ability of an agent, such as a robot or software system, to make decisions and take actions independently within a given environment. The goal is to develop a way to objectively measure how autonomous an agent is, rather than relying on subjective assessments.
The model described in the paper captures the key elements that influence an agent's behavior, including its internal decision-making process, the context or environment it operates in, and the desired outcomes it aims to achieve. By analyzing these factors, the researchers believe it's possible to quantify the degree of autonomy exhibited by the agent.
This could be useful for evaluating the capabilities of autonomous systems, such as self-driving cars or robotic assistants, and understanding how they make decisions in complex, real-world situations. It may also help identify areas where an agent's autonomy could be improved or where human oversight may be necessary.
Technical Explanation
The paper formalizes the notion of autonomy by defining an agent's decision-making process as a function of its internal state, the environmental context, and the desired outcomes. The authors propose a model that captures these elements and allows for the quantification of autonomy based on the agent's observed behavior.
The key components of the model include:
- Internal State: The agent's beliefs, goals, and decision-making capabilities.
- Environmental Context: The external factors and constraints that influence the agent's behavior.
- Desired Outcomes: The goals or objectives the agent is trying to achieve.
By analyzing how the agent's actions and decisions are shaped by these factors, the researchers believe it's possible to assess the level of autonomy the agent exhibits. This could involve metrics such as the agent's ability to adapt to changing conditions, the complexity of its decision-making process, and the degree of alignment between its actions and the desired outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a systematic approach to quantifying autonomy, which could be a valuable tool for evaluating and comparing the capabilities of autonomous systems. However, the proposed model may oversimplify the complexity of real-world decision-making, and there could be challenges in accurately capturing and measuring all the relevant factors that influence an agent's behavior.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns or societal implications of increased autonomy in systems, such as issues of responsibility, bias, and transparency. Further research may be needed to explore these broader implications and ensure that the quantification of autonomy aligns with societal values and expectations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a framework for quantifying the autonomy of agents operating in complex, real-world environments. By modeling the key elements that influence an agent's decision-making and behavior, the researchers aim to provide a systematic way to measure the level of autonomy exhibited by the agent.
While the proposed approach offers a promising step towards understanding and evaluating autonomous systems, it also raises questions about the limitations and potential risks of such quantification. Ongoing research and thoughtful consideration of the ethical and societal implications will be crucial as the field of autonomous systems continues to evolve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✅
0
A Good Bot Always Knows Its Limitations: Assessing Autonomous System Decision-making Competencies through Factorized Machine Self-confidence
Brett Israelsen, Nisar R. Ahmed, Matthew Aitken, Eric W. Frew, Dale A. Lawrence, Brian M. Argrow
How can intelligent machines assess their competencies in completing tasks? This question has come into focus for autonomous systems that algorithmically reason and make decisions under uncertainty. It is argued here that machine self-confidence - a form of meta-reasoning based on self-assessments of an agent's knowledge about the state of the world and itself, as well as its ability to reason about and execute tasks - leads to many eminently computable and useful competency indicators for such agents. This paper presents a culmination of work on this concept in the form of a computational framework called Factorized Machine Self-confidence (FaMSeC), which provides a holistic engineering-focused description of factors driving an algorithmic decision-making process, including: outcome assessment, solver quality, model quality, alignment quality, and past experience. In FaMSeC, self confidence indicators are derived from hierarchical `problem-solving statistics' embedded within broad classes of probabilistic decision-making algorithms such as Markov decision processes. The problem-solving statistics are obtained by evaluating and grading probabilistic exceedance margins with respect to given competency standards, which are specified for each of the various decision-making competency factors by the informee (e.g. a non-expert user or an expert system designer). This approach allows `algorithmic goodness of fit' evaluations to be easily incorporated into the design of many kinds of autonomous agents in the form of human-interpretable competency self-assessment reports. Detailed descriptions and application examples for a Markov decision process agent show how two of the FaMSeC factors (outcome assessment and solver quality) can be computed and reported for a range of possible tasking contexts through novel use of meta-utility functions, behavior simulations, and surrogate prediction models.
Read more8/6/2024
0
A Decision-driven Methodology for Designing Uncertainty-aware AI Self-Assessment
Gregory Canal, Vladimir Leung, Philip Sage, Eric Heim, I-Jeng Wang
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making processes and systems throughout society and, in particular, has emerged as a significant technology in high-impact scenarios of national interest. Yet, despite AI's impressive predictive capabilities in controlled settings, it still suffers from a range of practical setbacks preventing its widespread use in various critical scenarios. In particular, it is generally unclear if a given AI system's predictions can be trusted by decision-makers in downstream applications. To address the need for more transparent, robust, and trustworthy AI systems, a suite of tools has been developed to quantify the uncertainty of AI predictions and, more generally, enable AI to self-assess the reliability of its predictions. In this manuscript, we categorize methods for AI self-assessment along several key dimensions and provide guidelines for selecting and designing the appropriate method for a practitioner's needs. In particular, we focus on uncertainty estimation techniques that consider the impact of self-assessment on the choices made by downstream decision-makers and on the resulting costs and benefits of decision outcomes. To demonstrate the utility of our methodology for self-assessment design, we illustrate its use for two realistic national-interest scenarios. This manuscript is a practical guide for machine learning engineers and AI system users to select the ideal self-assessment techniques for each problem.
Read more8/6/2024
0
New!Know your limits! Optimize the robot's behavior through self-awareness
Esteve Valls Mascaro, Dongheui Lee
As humanoid robots transition from labs to real-world environments, it is essential to democratize robot control for non-expert users. Recent human-robot imitation algorithms focus on following a reference human motion with high precision, but they are susceptible to the quality of the reference motion and require the human operator to simplify its movements to match the robot's capabilities. Instead, we consider that the robot should understand and adapt the reference motion to its own abilities, facilitating the operator's task. For that, we introduce a deep-learning model that anticipates the robot's performance when imitating a given reference. Then, our system can generate multiple references given a high-level task command, assign a score to each of them, and select the best reference to achieve the desired robot behavior. Our Self-AWare model (SAW) ranks potential robot behaviors based on various criteria, such as fall likelihood, adherence to the reference motion, and smoothness. We integrate advanced motion generation, robot control, and SAW in one unique system, ensuring optimal robot behavior for any task command. For instance, SAW can anticipate falls with 99.29% accuracy. For more information check our project page: https://evm7.github.io/Self-AWare
Read more9/17/2024
🌐
0
A Quantitative Autonomy Quantification Framework for Fully Autonomous Robotic Systems
Nasser Gyagenda (University of Siegen), Hubert Roth (University of Siegen)
Although autonomous functioning facilitates deployment of robotic systems in domains that admit limited human oversight on our planet and beyond, finding correspondence between task requirements and autonomous capability is still an open challenge. Consequently, a number of methods for quantifying autonomy have been proposed over the last three decades, but to our knowledge all these have no discernment of sub-mode features of variation of autonomy and some are based on metrics that violet the Goodhart's law. This paper focuses on the full autonomous mode and proposes a quantitative autonomy assessment framework based on task requirements. The framework starts by establishing robot task characteristics from which three autonomy metrics, namely requisite capability set, reliability and responsiveness are derived. These characteristics were founded on the realization that robots ultimately replace human skilled workers, from which a relationship between human job and robot task characteristics was established. Additionally, mathematical functions mapping metrics to autonomy as a two-part measure, namely of level and degree of autonomy are also presented. The distinction between level and degree of autonomy stemmed from the acknowledgment that autonomy is not just a question of existence, but also one of performance of requisite capability. The framework has been demonstrated on two case studies, namely autonomous vehicle at an on-road dynamic driving task and the DARPA subterranean challenge rules analysis. The framework provides not only a tool for quantifying autonomy, but also a regulatory interface and common language for autonomous systems developers and users. Its greatest feature is the ability to monitor system integrity when implemented online.
Read more4/12/2024