Good Intentions, Risky Inventions: A Method for Assessing the Risks and Benefits of AI in Mobile and Wearable Uses

Read original: arXiv:2407.09322 - Published 7/30/2024 by Marios Constantinides, Edyta Bogucka, Sanja Scepanovic, Daniele Quercia
Total Score

0

Good Intentions, Risky Inventions: A Method for Assessing the Risks and Benefits of AI in Mobile and Wearable Uses

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for assessing the risks and benefits of using artificial intelligence (AI) in mobile and wearable devices.
  • The authors argue that while AI can bring many advantages, it also introduces new risks that need to be carefully evaluated.
  • The proposed framework aims to help developers, researchers, and policymakers make more informed decisions about deploying AI in these contexts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the use of AI in mobile and wearable technologies, such as smartphones, fitness trackers, and smart home devices. While AI can bring many benefits, like improved personalization, efficiency, and accessibility, the authors recognize that it also introduces new risks, such as privacy concerns, security vulnerabilities, and unintended consequences.

To address this, the researchers have developed a framework to help assess the tradeoffs between the potential risks and benefits of AI in these mobile and wearable applications. This framework provides a structured way to evaluate factors like data privacy, system security, user experience, and alignment with sustainable development goals.

The goal is to enable developers, researchers, and policymakers to make more informed decisions about deploying AI in these contexts. By carefully considering both the upsides and downsides, they can work to maximize the advantages while minimizing the risks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a "Transformation, Risk, and Benefit" (TRB) model for evaluating AI systems in mobile and wearable applications. This model considers three key dimensions:

  1. Transformation: How the AI system transforms the user experience, including changes to functionality, personalization, and accessibility.
  2. Risks: Potential downsides of the AI system, such as privacy violations, security breaches, and unintended consequences.
  3. Benefits: The advantages the AI system brings, like improved efficiency, cost savings, and alignment with sustainable development goals.

The authors demonstrate how this TRB model can be applied through case studies of AI-powered mobile apps and AI-enabled wearable devices. They also discuss methods for systematically assessing the security risks of these AI systems.

Overall, the paper highlights the need for a comprehensive, structured approach to evaluating the tradeoffs of AI in mobile and wearable contexts. This can help ensure that the benefits of these technologies are realized while the potential risks are properly mitigated.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that their proposed TRB model is a starting point and that further research is needed to refine and validate it. For example, they note the challenge of quantifying and comparing the often intangible risks and benefits of AI systems.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations around the use of AI in these personal, intimate devices. Leveraging AI to promote awareness and augmentation of users' experiences is an area that deserves more nuanced discussion.

There is also a need to better understand how users perceive and respond to the integration of AI in their mobile and wearable technologies. User acceptance and trust will be critical factors in the successful deployment of these systems.

Overall, the authors have provided a valuable framework for assessing AI risks and benefits, but continued work is needed to address the complex social, ethical, and psychological implications of these emerging technologies.

Conclusion

This paper presents a structured approach for evaluating the risks and benefits of incorporating AI into mobile and wearable devices. By considering the potential transformations, risks, and benefits, the authors aim to help developers, researchers, and policymakers make more informed decisions about deploying these technologies.

The proposed TRB model provides a useful starting point, but further research is needed to refine the framework and address the broader ethical and social considerations around AI in these intimate, personal contexts. Ongoing collaboration between technologists, domain experts, and end-users will be essential to ensure that the advantages of AI-powered mobile and wearable devices are realized while the risks are adequately mitigated.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Good Intentions, Risky Inventions: A Method for Assessing the Risks and Benefits of AI in Mobile and Wearable Uses
Total Score

0

Good Intentions, Risky Inventions: A Method for Assessing the Risks and Benefits of AI in Mobile and Wearable Uses

Marios Constantinides, Edyta Bogucka, Sanja Scepanovic, Daniele Quercia

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into mobile and wearables offers numerous benefits at individual, societal, and environmental levels. Yet, it also spotlights concerns over emerging risks. Traditional assessments of risks and benefits have been sporadic, and often require costly expert analysis. We developed a semi-automatic method that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify AI uses in mobile and wearables, classify their risks based on the EU AI Act, and determine their benefits that align with globally recognized long-term sustainable development goals; a manual validation of our method by two experts in mobile and wearable technologies, a legal and compliance expert, and a cohort of nine individuals with legal backgrounds who were recruited from Prolific, confirmed its accuracy to be over 85%. We uncovered that specific applications of mobile computing hold significant potential in improving well-being, safety, and social equality. However, these promising uses are linked to risks involving sensitive data, vulnerable groups, and automated decision-making. To avoid rejecting these risky yet impactful mobile and wearable uses, we propose a risk assessment checklist for the Mobile HCI community.

Read more

7/30/2024

The Atlas of AI Incidents in Mobile Computing: Visualizing the Risks and Benefits of AI Gone Mobile
Total Score

0

The Atlas of AI Incidents in Mobile Computing: Visualizing the Risks and Benefits of AI Gone Mobile

Edyta Bogucka, Marios Constantinides, Julia De Miguel Velazquez, Sanja v{S}'cepanovi'c, Daniele Quercia, Andr'es Gvirtz

Today's visualization tools for conveying the risks and benefits of AI technologies are largely tailored for those with technical expertise. To bridge this gap, we have developed a visualization that employs narrative patterns and interactive elements, enabling the broader public to gradually grasp the diverse risks and benefits associated with AI. Using a dataset of 54 real-world incidents involving AI in mobile computing, we examined design choices that enhance public understanding and provoke reflection on how certain AI applications - even those deemed low-risk by law - can still lead to significant incidents. Visualization: https://social-dynamics.net/mobile-ai-risks

Read more

7/23/2024

Reporting Risks in AI-based Assistive Technology Research: A Systematic Review
Total Score

0

Reporting Risks in AI-based Assistive Technology Research: A Systematic Review

Zahra Ahmadi, Peter R. Lewis, Mahadeo A. Sukhai

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly employed to enhance assistive technologies, yet it can fail in various ways. We conducted a systematic literature review of research into AI-based assistive technology for persons with visual impairments. Our study shows that most proposed technologies with a testable prototype have not been evaluated in a human study with members of the sight-loss community. Furthermore, many studies did not consider or report failure cases or possible risks. These findings highlight the importance of inclusive system evaluations and the necessity of standardizing methods for presenting and analyzing failure cases and threats when developing AI-based assistive technologies.

Read more

7/22/2024

šŸ“ˆ

Total Score

0

The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Risks and Benefits Through Practical Solutions and Use Cases

Richard Fulton (Department of Computer Science, Troy University, Troy, Alabama, USA), Diane Fulton (Department of Management, Clayton State University, Morrow, Georgia, USA), Nate Hayes (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota), Susan Kaplan (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

This paper summarizes the most cogent advantages and risks associated with Artificial Intelligence from an in-depth review of the literature. Then the authors synthesize the salient risk-related models currently being used in AI, technology and business-related scenarios. Next, in view of an updated context of AI along with theories and models reviewed and expanded constructs, the writers propose a new framework called The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence to address the increasing fears and levels of AI risk. Using the model characteristics, the article emphasizes practical and innovative solutions where benefits outweigh risks and three use cases in healthcare, climate change/environment and cyber security to illustrate unique interplay of principles, dimensions and processes of this powerful AI transformational model.

Read more

6/19/2024