The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Risks and Benefits Through Practical Solutions and Use Cases
0
📈
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the advantages and risks associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based on an in-depth review of the literature.
- The authors synthesize the current risk-related models used in AI, technology, and business scenarios.
- They propose a new framework called the Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence to address the growing fears and levels of AI risk.
- The model is applied to three use cases in healthcare, climate change/environment, and cybersecurity to demonstrate its practical applications and benefits.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at both the positive and negative aspects of AI technology. It summarizes the key risks and benefits that have been identified through extensive research. The authors then take this information and develop a new framework or model to help understand and manage the risks of AI as the technology continues to advance.
The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence aims to provide a structured way to evaluate the trade-offs between the risks and potential benefits of AI in different real-world applications. The model is then applied to three specific examples - healthcare, climate change, and cybersecurity - to demonstrate how it can be used in practice.
The goal is to give decision-makers and the public a better way to assess AI technologies and ensure the benefits outweigh the risks, especially as AI capabilities become more sophisticated and complex. This can help address growing fears and concerns about the potential dangers of AI and guide the responsible development and deployment of these powerful technologies.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins with an in-depth review of the literature on the advantages and risks associated with AI. The authors synthesize the current risk-related models used in AI, technology, and business scenarios.
Based on this analysis, the authors propose a new framework called the Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence. This model aims to help address the growing fears and levels of AI risk by providing a structured way to evaluate the trade-offs between the potential benefits and the various risks of AI technologies.
The key dimensions and processes of the Transformation Risk-Benefit Model are then applied to three real-world use cases: healthcare, climate change/environment, and cybersecurity. These case studies illustrate how the model can be used to assess the unique interplay of principles, dimensions, and processes involved in the responsible development and deployment of transformative AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing the risks and benefits of AI, which is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussions around the responsible development of these powerful technologies.
However, the model itself is relatively high-level and may require further refinement and validation through additional case studies and real-world applications. The authors acknowledge that the model is an initial proposal and that more research is needed to fully evaluate its effectiveness.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into some of the more complex or emerging risks associated with AI, such as the potential for AI systems to exhibit unexpected or unintended behaviors. Further exploration of these issues could strengthen the model and provide a more well-rounded approach to AI risk analysis.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new framework called the Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence that aims to help decision-makers and the public better understand and manage the trade-offs between the potential benefits and risks of AI technologies.
By applying the model to three real-world use cases, the authors demonstrate its practical applications and illustrate how it can guide the responsible development and deployment of transformative AI systems. While the model requires further refinement and validation, it is a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure AI is deployed in a way that maximizes societal benefits while minimizing potential harms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
0
The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Risks and Benefits Through Practical Solutions and Use Cases
Richard Fulton (Department of Computer Science, Troy University, Troy, Alabama, USA), Diane Fulton (Department of Management, Clayton State University, Morrow, Georgia, USA), Nate Hayes (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota), Susan Kaplan (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota)
This paper summarizes the most cogent advantages and risks associated with Artificial Intelligence from an in-depth review of the literature. Then the authors synthesize the salient risk-related models currently being used in AI, technology and business-related scenarios. Next, in view of an updated context of AI along with theories and models reviewed and expanded constructs, the writers propose a new framework called The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence to address the increasing fears and levels of AI risk. Using the model characteristics, the article emphasizes practical and innovative solutions where benefits outweigh risks and three use cases in healthcare, climate change/environment and cyber security to illustrate unique interplay of principles, dimensions and processes of this powerful AI transformational model.
Read more6/19/2024
➖
0
Prioritizing High-Consequence Biological Capabilities in Evaluations of Artificial Intelligence Models
Jaspreet Pannu, Doni Bloomfield, Alex Zhu, Robert MacKnight, Gabe Gomes, Anita Cicero, Thomas V. Inglesby
As a result of rapidly accelerating AI capabilities, over the past year, national governments and multinational bodies have announced efforts to address safety, security and ethics issues related to AI models. One high priority among these efforts is the mitigation of misuse of AI models. Many biologists have for decades sought to reduce the risks of scientific research that could lead, through accident or misuse, to high-consequence disease outbreaks. Scientists have carefully considered what types of life sciences research have the potential for both benefit and risk (dual-use), especially as scientific advances have accelerated our ability to engineer organisms and create novel variants of pathogens. Here we describe how previous experience and study by scientists and policy professionals of dual-use capabilities in the life sciences can inform risk evaluations of AI models with biological capabilities. We argue that AI model evaluations should prioritize addressing high-consequence risks (those that could cause large-scale harm to the public, such as pandemics), and that these risks should be evaluated prior to model deployment so as to allow potential biosafety and/or biosecurity measures. Scientists' experience with identifying and mitigating dual-use biological risks can help inform new approaches to evaluating biological AI models. Identifying which AI capabilities post the greatest biosecurity and biosafety concerns is necessary in order to establish targeted AI safety evaluation methods, secure these tools against accident and misuse, and avoid impeding immense potential benefits.
Read more7/24/2024
🤖
0
Towards Risk Analysis of the Impact of AI on the Deliberate Biological Threat Landscape
Matthew E. Walsh
The perception that the convergence of biological engineering and artificial intelligence (AI) could enable increased biorisk has recently drawn attention to the governance of biotechnology and artificial intelligence. The 2023 Executive Order, Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, requires an assessment of how artificial intelligence can increase biorisk. Within this perspective, quantitative and qualitative frameworks for evaluating biorisk are presented. Both frameworks are exercised using notional scenarios and their benefits and limitations are then discussed. Finally, the perspective concludes by noting that assessment and evaluation methodologies must keep pace with advances of AI in the life sciences.
Read more6/12/2024
🤖
0
Generative AI Models: Opportunities and Risks for Industry and Authorities
Tobias Alt, Andrea Ibisch, Clemens Meiser, Anna Wilhelm, Raphael Zimmer, Christian Berghoff, Christoph Droste, Jens Karschau, Friederike Laus, Rainer Plaga, Carola Plesch, Britta Sennewald, Thomas Thaeren, Kristina Unverricht, Steffen Waurick
Generative AI models are capable of performing a wide range of tasks that traditionally require creativity and human understanding. They learn patterns from existing data during training and can subsequently generate new content such as texts, images, and music that follow these patterns. Due to their versatility and generally high-quality results, they, on the one hand, represent an opportunity for digitalization. On the other hand, the use of generative AI models introduces novel IT security risks that need to be considered for a comprehensive analysis of the threat landscape in relation to IT security. In response to this risk potential, companies or authorities using them should conduct an individual risk analysis before integrating generative AI into their workflows. The same applies to developers and operators, as many risks in the context of generative AI have to be taken into account at the time of development or can only be influenced by the operating company. Based on this, existing security measures can be adjusted, and additional measures can be taken.
Read more6/10/2024