Can Pre-trained Language Models Understand Chinese Humor?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers investigate whether pre-trained language models can understand Chinese humor
- They develop a humor evaluation framework and a Chinese humor dataset to test model performance
- Findings provide insights into the capabilities and limitations of language models for humor comprehension
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether pre-trained language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, can understand and appreciate Chinese humor. The researchers developed a humor evaluation framework and a Chinese humor dataset to assess the performance of these models.
The goal was to understand the strengths and weaknesses of language models when it comes to comprehending humor, which can be a complex and contextual form of communication. By testing the models on a diverse set of Chinese jokes and humorous expressions, the researchers gained insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI systems for understanding this nuanced aspect of human language.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first created a humor evaluation framework that allowed them to systematically assess a language model's ability to recognize and appreciate humor. This framework involved evaluating the model's performance on tasks like identifying the punchline of a joke, detecting the humorous intent, and assessing the overall funniness.
Using this framework, the researchers then tested several pre-trained language models on a Chinese humor dataset that they had developed. This dataset contained a diverse range of Chinese jokes, puns, and other humorous expressions, designed to challenge the language models' understanding of cultural context and linguistic nuance.
The results of the experiments provided insights into the strengths and limitations of the language models when it came to comprehending Chinese humor. While the models were able to perform reasonably well on some tasks, such as identifying the punchline, they struggled with more complex aspects of humor, such as understanding cultural references and detecting subtle irony or sarcasm.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that while the research provides valuable insights, there are still many challenges and limitations to overcome in the quest to develop AI systems that can truly understand and appreciate humor. The Chinese humor dataset used in the study, while comprehensive, may not capture the full breadth and diversity of humorous expressions in the Chinese language and culture.
Additionally, the paper suggests that future research could explore the use of multimodal approaches, which incorporate visual, auditory, and other contextual information, to improve the models' understanding of humor. The researchers also note that developing more sophisticated humor generation and detection techniques could be a fruitful area for further research.
Conclusion
This paper represents an important step in the ongoing effort to develop AI systems that can comprehend and appreciate the nuances of human humor, particularly in the context of the Chinese language and culture. The researchers' humor evaluation framework and Chinese humor dataset provide valuable tools for assessing the capabilities of language models and identifying areas for improvement. While current models have limitations, the insights gained from this research can inform the development of more advanced AI systems that can better understand and engage with the complexities of human humor.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Can Pre-trained Language Models Understand Chinese Humor?
Yuyan Chen, Zhixu Li, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Bang Liu, Yunwen Chen
Humor understanding is an important and challenging research in natural language processing. As the popularity of pre-trained language models (PLMs), some recent work makes preliminary attempts to adopt PLMs for humor recognition and generation. However, these simple attempts do not substantially answer the question: {em whether PLMs are capable of humor understanding?} This paper is the first work that systematically investigates the humor understanding ability of PLMs. For this purpose, a comprehensive framework with three evaluation steps and four evaluation tasks is designed. We also construct a comprehensive Chinese humor dataset, which can fully meet all the data requirements of the proposed evaluation framework. Our empirical study on the Chinese humor dataset yields some valuable observations, which are of great guiding value for future optimization of PLMs in humor understanding and generation.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Getting Serious about Humor: Crafting Humor Datasets with Unfunny Large Language Models
Zachary Horvitz, Jingru Chen, Rahul Aditya, Harshvardhan Srivastava, Robert West, Zhou Yu, Kathleen McKeown
Humor is a fundamental facet of human cognition and interaction. Yet, despite recent advances in natural language processing, humor detection remains a challenging task that is complicated by the scarcity of datasets that pair humorous texts with similar non-humorous counterparts. In our work, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs), can generate synthetic data for humor detection via editing texts. We benchmark LLMs on an existing human dataset and show that current LLMs display an impressive ability to 'unfun' jokes, as judged by humans and as measured on the downstream task of humor detection. We extend our approach to a code-mixed English-Hindi humor dataset, where we find that GPT-4's synthetic data is highly rated by bilingual annotators and provides challenging adversarial examples for humor classifiers.
Read more6/24/2024
💬
0
A good pun is its own reword: Can Large Language Models Understand Puns?
Zhijun Xu, Siyu Yuan, Lingjie Chen, Deqing Yang
Puns play a vital role in academic research due to their distinct structure and clear definition, which aid in the comprehensive analysis of linguistic humor. However, the understanding of puns in large language models (LLMs) has not been thoroughly examined, limiting their use in creative writing and humor creation. In this paper, we leverage three popular tasks, i.e., pun recognition, explanation and generation to systematically evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in pun understanding. In addition to adopting the automated evaluation metrics from prior research, we introduce new evaluation methods and metrics that are better suited to the in-context learning paradigm of LLMs. These new metrics offer a more rigorous assessment of an LLM's ability to understand puns and align more closely with human cognition than previous metrics. Our findings reveal the lazy pun generation pattern and identify the primary challenges LLMs encounter in understanding puns.
Read more6/18/2024
0
A Robot Walks into a Bar: Can Language Models Serve asCreativity Support Tools for Comedy? An Evaluation of LLMs' Humour Alignment with Comedians
Piotr Wojciech Mirowski, Juliette Love, Kory W. Mathewson, Shakir Mohamed
We interviewed twenty professional comedians who perform live shows in front of audiences and who use artificial intelligence in their artistic process as part of 3-hour workshops on ``AI x Comedy'' conducted at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in August 2023 and online. The workshop consisted of a comedy writing session with large language models (LLMs), a human-computer interaction questionnaire to assess the Creativity Support Index of AI as a writing tool, and a focus group interrogating the comedians' motivations for and processes of using AI, as well as their ethical concerns about bias, censorship and copyright. Participants noted that existing moderation strategies used in safety filtering and instruction-tuned LLMs reinforced hegemonic viewpoints by erasing minority groups and their perspectives, and qualified this as a form of censorship. At the same time, most participants felt the LLMs did not succeed as a creativity support tool, by producing bland and biased comedy tropes, akin to ``cruise ship comedy material from the 1950s, but a bit less racist''. Our work extends scholarship about the subtle difference between, one the one hand, harmful speech, and on the other hand, ``offensive'' language as a practice of resistance, satire and ``punching up''. We also interrogate the global value alignment behind such language models, and discuss the importance of community-based value alignment and data ownership to build AI tools that better suit artists' needs.
Read more6/5/2024