Graph-based Time Series Clustering for End-to-End Hierarchical Forecasting

Overview

• Time series relationships can be used as inductive biases to improve forecasting models.
• Hierarchical time series have relationships between subsets of sequences that impose constraints on predicted values.
• This paper proposes a graph-based method to unify relational and hierarchical inductive biases for deep learning in time series forecasting.

Plain English Explanation

Time series data, which represents measurements collected over time, often contains relationships between different sequences of data. The authors of this paper suggest that exploiting these relationships can help machine learning models make better forecasts.

In hierarchical time series data, there are additional constraints because the data is organized into a hierarchy, such as monthly sales data broken down by product, region, and store. The relationships between these subsets of the data impose hard limits on the forecasted values.

The key idea of this paper is to model both the general relationships between time series, as well as the hierarchical structure, using a graph neural network. The graph structure captures the dependencies between the data, and the model can learn to organize the data into a hierarchy if it is not already provided. This allows the model to make forecasts that respect the hierarchical constraints.

The paper shows that this graph-based approach performs well compared to other state-of-the-art time series forecasting methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a graph-based methodology to unify relational and hierarchical inductive biases for deep learning in time series forecasting.

The key components are:

1. Pyramidal Graph Structure: The relationships between time series are modeled as dependencies in a pyramidal graph, where each layer corresponds to a level of the hierarchy.

2. Trainable Graph Pooling: Modern graph pooling operators are used to learn the hierarchical structure directly from the data, if it is not provided as a prior.

3. Differentiable Reconciliation: A reconciliation stage is incorporated into the model architecture, allowing the hierarchical constraints to act as both an architectural bias and a regularization element for the forecasts.

The authors evaluate the proposed method on representative datasets and show it compares favorably to the state of the art.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to leveraging both relational and hierarchical information for time series forecasting. However, the authors acknowledge that the method relies on the assumption that the hierarchical structure, if not available as a prior, can be learned effectively from the data. This may not always be the case, especially for more complex hierarchies.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential limitations of the graph-based approach, such as scalability issues or the impact of the graph structure on model performance. Further research could investigate these aspects in more depth.

Overall, the research is a valuable contribution to the field of time series forecasting, but additional work may be needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and broader applicability of the proposed method.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a graph-based framework that can effectively capture both relational and hierarchical inductive biases for deep learning in time series forecasting. By modeling the dependencies between time series as a pyramidal graph structure and incorporating a differentiable reconciliation stage, the method can produce forecasts that respect hierarchical constraints.

The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to outperform other state-of-the-art forecasting techniques. While further research is needed to fully explore the method's limitations and broader applications, this work represents an important step forward in leveraging the rich structure inherent in time series data to improve forecasting performance.