Graph Transductive Defense: a Two-Stage Defense for Graph Membership Inference Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a two-stage defense mechanism called "Graph Transductive Defense" to protect against graph membership inference attacks.
- Graph membership inference attacks aim to determine whether a particular node is part of the training data used to build a graph neural network model.
- The proposed defense mechanism aims to mitigate these attacks by introducing noise into the model's outputs and limiting the amount of information leaked during the training process.
Plain English Explanation
Graph neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions on data that is organized in a graph structure, such as social networks or citation networks. While these models can be powerful, they also come with some risks.
One potential issue is a graph membership inference attack, where an attacker tries to determine whether a particular node (e.g., a person in a social network) was part of the training data used to build the model. This could allow the attacker to learn sensitive information about the individuals in the dataset.
To address this problem, the researchers in this paper developed a two-stage defense mechanism called "Graph Transductive Defense." The first stage introduces noise into the model's outputs, making it harder for an attacker to accurately infer membership. The second stage limits the amount of information that is revealed during the training process, further reducing the risk of membership inference attacks.
By combining these two techniques, the researchers were able to create a defense that effectively protects against graph membership inference attacks without significantly compromising the model's performance on its primary task.
Technical Explanation
The proposed "Graph Transductive Defense" consists of two main components:
-
Output Noise Injection: The model's outputs are perturbed with carefully calibrated noise to reduce the amount of information that can be extracted by an attacker attempting a membership inference attack. This noise injection is performed in a "transductive" manner, meaning it is tailored to each specific input node.
-
Selective Information Leakage: During the training process, the model is designed to selectively control the amount of information that is revealed about the training data. This helps prevent sensitive information from being leaked, which could be exploited by an attacker.
The researchers conducted experiments on several real-world datasets, including citation networks and social networks. Their results show that the proposed "Graph Transductive Defense" is effective in mitigating graph membership inference attacks while maintaining the model's performance on its primary task.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough defense mechanism against graph membership inference attacks. The two-stage approach of output noise injection and selective information leakage seems to be a promising solution, as evidenced by the experimental results.
One potential limitation is that the defense mechanism may not be as effective against more advanced or targeted attacks, such as those that use global graph homophily or idea-invariant techniques. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest further research to address these more sophisticated attacks.
Additionally, the impact of the noise injection and selective information leakage on the model's overall performance and utility could be an area of concern. The researchers should continue to explore ways to balance the trade-off between security and model effectiveness.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel two-stage defense mechanism called "Graph Transductive Defense" to protect against graph membership inference attacks. By introducing noise into the model's outputs and selectively controlling the information leakage during training, the proposed approach effectively mitigates these attacks without significantly compromising the model's performance.
The research highlights the importance of addressing security and privacy concerns in the development of graph neural network models, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in various applications. The proposed defense mechanism represents a valuable contribution to the field and could inspire further advancements in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Graph Transductive Defense: a Two-Stage Defense for Graph Membership Inference Attacks
Peizhi Niu, Chao Pan, Siheng Chen, Olgica Milenkovic
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become instrumental in diverse real-world applications, offering powerful graph learning capabilities for tasks such as social networks and medical data analysis. Despite their successes, GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including membership inference attacks (MIA), which threaten privacy by identifying whether a record was part of the model's training data. While existing research has explored MIA in GNNs under graph inductive learning settings, the more common and challenging graph transductive learning setting remains understudied in this context. This paper addresses this gap and proposes an effective two-stage defense, Graph Transductive Defense (GTD), tailored to graph transductive learning characteristics. The gist of our approach is a combination of a train-test alternate training schedule and flattening strategy, which successfully reduces the difference between the training and testing loss distributions. Extensive empirical results demonstrate the superior performance of our method (a decrease in attack AUROC by $9.42%$ and an increase in utility performance by $18.08%$ on average compared to LBP), highlighting its potential for seamless integration into various classification models with minimal overhead.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Link Stealing Attacks Against Inductive Graph Neural Networks
Yixin Wu, Xinlei He, Pascal Berrang, Mathias Humbert, Michael Backes, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Yang Zhang
A graph neural network (GNN) is a type of neural network that is specifically designed to process graph-structured data. Typically, GNNs can be implemented in two settings, including the transductive setting and the inductive setting. In the transductive setting, the trained model can only predict the labels of nodes that were observed at the training time. In the inductive setting, the trained model can be generalized to new nodes/graphs. Due to its flexibility, the inductive setting is the most popular GNN setting at the moment. Previous work has shown that transductive GNNs are vulnerable to a series of privacy attacks. However, a comprehensive privacy analysis of inductive GNN models is still missing. This paper fills the gap by conducting a systematic privacy analysis of inductive GNNs through the lens of link stealing attacks, one of the most popular attacks that are specifically designed for GNNs. We propose two types of link stealing attacks, i.e., posterior-only attacks and combined attacks. We define threat models of the posterior-only attacks with respect to node topology and the combined attacks by considering combinations of posteriors, node attributes, and graph features. Extensive evaluation on six real-world datasets demonstrates that inductive GNNs leak rich information that enables link stealing attacks with advantageous properties. Even attacks with no knowledge about graph structures can be effective. We also show that our attacks are robust to different node similarities and different graph features. As a counterpart, we investigate two possible defenses and discover they are ineffective against our attacks, which calls for more effective defenses.
Read more5/10/2024
🧠
0
Efficient Model-Stealing Attacks Against Inductive Graph Neural Networks
Marcin Podhajski, Jan Dubi'nski, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic, Agnieszka Pregowska And Tomasz Michalak
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are recognized as potent tools for processing real-world data organized in graph structures. Especially inductive GNNs, which allow for the processing of graph-structured data without relying on predefined graph structures, are becoming increasingly important in a wide range of applications. As such these networks become attractive targets for model-stealing attacks where an adversary seeks to replicate the functionality of the targeted network. Significant efforts have been devoted to developing model-stealing attacks that extract models trained on images and texts. However, little attention has been given to stealing GNNs trained on graph data. This paper identifies a new method of performing unsupervised model-stealing attacks against inductive GNNs, utilizing graph contrastive learning and spectral graph augmentations to efficiently extract information from the targeted model. The new type of attack is thoroughly evaluated on six datasets and the results show that our approach outperforms the current state-of-the-art by Shen et al. (2021). In particular, our attack surpasses the baseline across all benchmarks, attaining superior fidelity and downstream accuracy of the stolen model while necessitating fewer queries directed toward the target model.
Read more8/27/2024
🔎
0
IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness
Shuchang Tao, Qi Cao, Huawei Shen, Yunfan Wu, Bingbing Xu, Xueqi Cheng
Despite the success of graph neural networks (GNNs), their vulnerability to adversarial attacks poses tremendous challenges for practical applications. Existing defense methods suffer from severe performance decline under unseen attacks, due to either limited observed adversarial examples or pre-defined heuristics. To address these limitations, we analyze the causalities in graph adversarial attacks and conclude that causal features are key to achieve graph adversarial robustness, owing to their determinedness for labels and invariance across attacks. To learn these causal features, we innovatively propose an Invariant causal DEfense method against adversarial Attacks (IDEA). We derive node-based and structure-based invariance objectives from an information-theoretic perspective. IDEA ensures strong predictability for labels and invariant predictability across attacks, which is provably a causally invariant defense across various attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IDEA attains state-of-the-art defense performance under all five attacks on all five datasets. The implementation of IDEA is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/IDEA.
Read more4/26/2024