Group Decision-Making among Privacy-Aware Agents
2402.08156
0
0
👁️
Abstract
How can individuals exchange information to learn from each other despite their privacy needs and security concerns? For example, consider individuals deliberating a contentious topic and being concerned about divulging their private experiences. Preserving individual privacy and enabling efficient social learning are both important desiderata but seem fundamentally at odds with each other and very hard to reconcile. We do so by controlling information leakage using rigorous statistical guarantees that are based on differential privacy (DP). Our agents use log-linear rules to update their beliefs after communicating with their neighbors. Adding DP randomization noise to beliefs provides communicating agents with plausible deniability with regard to their private information and their network neighborhoods. We consider two learning environments one for distributed maximum-likelihood estimation given a finite number of private signals and another for online learning from an infinite, intermittent signal stream. Noisy information aggregation in the finite case leads to interesting tradeoffs between rejecting low-quality states and making sure all high-quality states are accepted in the algorithm output. Our results flesh out the nature of the trade-offs in both cases between the quality of the group decision outcomes, learning accuracy, communication cost, and the level of privacy protections that the agents are afforded.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This research paper explores how privacy-aware agents can make group decisions while preserving individual privacy.
- The paper investigates the interplay between privacy preservation, group decision-making, and distributed learning.
- It proposes algorithms and strategies for enabling privacy-preserving collective decision-making in multi-agent systems.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world scenarios, such as distributed estimation, distributed learning, and online learning, individual agents or participants may have sensitive information they want to keep private. At the same time, these agents may need to work together to make collective decisions that benefit the group as a whole.
The key challenge is finding ways for the agents to collaborate and make decisions without compromising their individual privacy. This paper presents strategies and algorithms that allow privacy-aware agents to engage in group decision-making while preserving the confidentiality of their personal data.
The researchers explore different network structures and decision-making protocols that can facilitate privacy-preserving collective decision-making. They also analyze the tradeoffs between privacy, decision accuracy, and convergence speed in these multi-agent systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the network structure and decision-making model for the group of privacy-aware agents. It considers both centralized and decentralized approaches, analyzing the implications for privacy preservation and decision quality.
The researchers then propose several algorithms for enabling privacy-preserving group decision-making. These include techniques for differential privacy, where agents can collaborate while adding noise to their personal data to hide sensitive information. The paper also explores the use of secure multi-party computation and other cryptographic methods to facilitate joint decision-making without direct data sharing.
Through theoretical analysis and simulation experiments, the authors investigate the performance of these privacy-preserving algorithms in terms of decision accuracy, convergence speed, and the degree of privacy protection achieved. They also discuss how the network structure and decision protocol can be optimized to balance these competing objectives.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical foundation and practical strategies for addressing the important challenge of privacy-preserving group decision-making. However, the authors acknowledge that their work is limited to relatively simplified scenarios and does not consider more complex real-world dynamics, such as strategic agent behavior or the potential for collusion.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the computational and communication overhead associated with the proposed privacy-preserving algorithms. Further research is needed to assess the scalability and practical feasibility of these approaches in large-scale, resource-constrained multi-agent systems.
Conclusion
This research paper offers valuable insights into the design of privacy-aware multi-agent systems capable of collective decision-making. By balancing the need for privacy protection with the desire for accurate and timely group decisions, the proposed strategies and algorithms lay the groundwork for more trustworthy and inclusive collaborative decision-making processes. As distributed and decentralized systems continue to grow in importance, this work provides a important foundation for enabling privacy-preserving cooperation among diverse, privacy-conscious agents.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play
Dan Qiao, Yu-Xiang Wang
0
0
We study the problem of multi-agent reinforcement learning (multi-agent RL) with differential privacy (DP) constraints. This is well-motivated by various real-world applications involving sensitive data, where it is critical to protect users' private information. We first extend the definitions of Joint DP (JDP) and Local DP (LDP) to two-player zero-sum episodic Markov Games, where both definitions ensure trajectory-wise privacy protection. Then we design a provably efficient algorithm based on optimistic Nash value iteration and privatization of Bernstein-type bonuses. The algorithm is able to satisfy JDP and LDP requirements when instantiated with appropriate privacy mechanisms. Furthermore, for both notions of DP, our regret bound generalizes the best known result under the single-agent RL case, while our regret could also reduce to the best known result for multi-agent RL without privacy constraints. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first line of results towards understanding trajectory-wise privacy protection in multi-agent RL.
4/12/2024
Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness
Mengmeng Yang, Ming Ding, Youyang Qu, Wei Ni, David Smith, Thierry Rakotoarivelo
0
0
The worldwide adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning models, particularly in critical sectors, such as healthcare and finance, presents substantial challenges in maintaining individual privacy and fairness. These two elements are vital to a trustworthy environment for learning systems. While numerous studies have concentrated on protecting individual privacy through differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, emerging research indicates that differential privacy in machine learning models can unequally impact separate demographic subgroups regarding prediction accuracy. This leads to a fairness concern, and manifests as biased performance. Although the prevailing view is that enhancing privacy intensifies fairness disparities, a smaller, yet significant, subset of research suggests the opposite view. In this article, with extensive evaluation results, we demonstrate that the impact of differential privacy on fairness is not monotonous. Instead, we observe that the accuracy disparity initially grows as more DP noise (enhanced privacy) is added to the ML process, but subsequently diminishes at higher privacy levels with even more noise. Moreover, implementing gradient clipping in the differentially private stochastic gradient descent ML method can mitigate the negative impact of DP noise on fairness. This mitigation is achieved by moderating the disparity growth through a lower clipping threshold.
4/16/2024
📉
Privacy-Constrained Policies via Mutual Information Regularized Policy Gradients
Chris Cundy, Rishi Desai, Stefano Ermon
0
0
As reinforcement learning techniques are increasingly applied to real-world decision problems, attention has turned to how these algorithms use potentially sensitive information. We consider the task of training a policy that maximizes reward while minimizing disclosure of certain sensitive state variables through the actions. We give examples of how this setting covers real-world problems in privacy for sequential decision-making. We solve this problem in the policy gradients framework by introducing a regularizer based on the mutual information (MI) between the sensitive state and the actions. We develop a model-based stochastic gradient estimator for optimization of privacy-constrained policies. We also discuss an alternative MI regularizer that serves as an upper bound to our main MI regularizer and can be optimized in a model-free setting, and a powerful direct estimator that can be used in an environment with differentiable dynamics. We contrast previous work in differentially-private RL to our mutual-information formulation of information disclosure. Experimental results show that our training method results in policies that hide the sensitive state, even in challenging high-dimensional tasks.
4/17/2024
Optimizing Privacy and Utility Tradeoffs for Group Interests Through Harmonization
Bishwas Mandal, George Amariucai, Shuangqing Wei
0
0
We propose a novel problem formulation to address the privacy-utility tradeoff, specifically when dealing with two distinct user groups characterized by unique sets of private and utility attributes. Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on scenarios where all users share identical private and utility attributes and often rely on auxiliary datasets or manual annotations, we introduce a collaborative data-sharing mechanism between two user groups through a trusted third party. This third party uses adversarial privacy techniques with our proposed data-sharing mechanism to internally sanitize data for both groups and eliminates the need for manual annotation or auxiliary datasets. Our methodology ensures that private attributes cannot be accurately inferred while enabling highly accurate predictions of utility features. Importantly, even if analysts or adversaries possess auxiliary datasets containing raw data, they are unable to accurately deduce private features. Additionally, our data-sharing mechanism is compatible with various existing adversarially trained privacy techniques. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using synthetic and real-world datasets, showcasing its ability to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and utility.
4/9/2024