Hard-Label Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a hard-label cryptanalytic approach to extract neural network models.
- This technique allows an attacker to reconstruct a target model's architecture and parameters using only the model's outputs on selected inputs.
- The extraction process is demonstrated on several benchmark models and shown to be effective even with limited query access.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new way for attackers to reconstruct the inner workings of neural network models using only the model's outputs, without any direct access to the model's parameters or architecture.
This "hard-label" approach goes beyond simple label extraction and allows the attacker to fully reverse-engineer the target model. The attacker can determine the model's structure as well as the precise numerical values of its internal parameters.
The researchers demonstrate this extraction process on several common neural network benchmarks, showing it can be effective even when the attacker has limited ability to query the target model. This raises concerns about the potential for misuse of these techniques in adversarial security scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this work is the use of a "hard-label" cryptanalytic approach for model extraction. Rather than simply querying the target model and recording its output labels, the attacker performs a more sophisticated analysis of the model's decision boundaries.
The extraction process involves:
- Carefully selecting a set of input queries to the target model.
- Analyzing the model's hard label outputs (the final predicted class) on those inputs.
- Using cryptanalytic techniques to reconstruct the model's underlying architecture and numerical parameters.
The researchers demonstrate this approach on several standard neural network benchmarks, including convolutional and fully-connected models of varying sizes. They show the extracted models achieve high fidelity in replicating the original models' behavior, even with limited query access.
Critical Analysis
While the extraction technique presented is technically impressive, the paper acknowledges some important limitations and caveats:
- The extraction process requires the attacker to have some initial knowledge about the target model's architecture and hyperparameters. Complete black-box extraction remains a challenge.
- The extraction is demonstrated on standard benchmarks, but the effectiveness may vary for more complex or specialized models used in real-world applications.
- There are potential defenses, such as obfuscating the model's decision boundaries, that could complicate or prevent this style of extraction attack.
Overall, this research highlights the need for continued work on model protection and security as machine learning models become more widespread and valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a powerful technique for extracting the full architecture and parameters of a neural network model using only its hard label outputs. While this capability raises significant security concerns, it also underscores the importance of developing robust defenses to protect sensitive machine learning models from unauthorized extraction and misuse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Hard-Label Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Models
Yi Chen, Xiaoyang Dong, Jian Guo, Yantian Shen, Anyu Wang, Xiaoyun Wang
The machine learning problem of extracting neural network parameters has been proposed for nearly three decades. Functionally equivalent extraction is a crucial goal for research on this problem. When the adversary has access to the raw output of neural networks, various attacks, including those presented at CRYPTO 2020 and EUROCRYPT 2024, have successfully achieved this goal. However, this goal is not achieved when neural networks operate under a hard-label setting where the raw output is inaccessible. In this paper, we propose the first attack that theoretically achieves functionally equivalent extraction under the hard-label setting, which applies to ReLU neural networks. The effectiveness of our attack is validated through practical experiments on a wide range of ReLU neural networks, including neural networks trained on two real benchmarking datasets (MNIST, CIFAR10) widely used in computer vision. For a neural network consisting of $10^5$ parameters, our attack only requires several hours on a single core.
Read more9/19/2024
0
Beyond Slow Signs in High-fidelity Model Extraction
Hanna Foerster, Robert Mullins, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes
Deep neural networks, costly to train and rich in intellectual property value, are increasingly threatened by model extraction attacks that compromise their confidentiality. Previous attacks have succeeded in reverse-engineering model parameters up to a precision of float64 for models trained on random data with at most three hidden layers using cryptanalytical techniques. However, the process was identified to be very time consuming and not feasible for larger and deeper models trained on standard benchmarks. Our study evaluates the feasibility of parameter extraction methods of Carlini et al. [1] further enhanced by Canales-Mart'inez et al. [2] for models trained on standard benchmarks. We introduce a unified codebase that integrates previous methods and reveal that computational tools can significantly influence performance. We develop further optimisations to the end-to-end attack and improve the efficiency of extracting weight signs by up to 14.8 times compared to former methods through the identification of easier and harder to extract neurons. Contrary to prior assumptions, we identify extraction of weights, not extraction of weight signs, as the critical bottleneck. With our improvements, a 16,721 parameter model with 2 hidden layers trained on MNIST is extracted within only 98 minutes compared to at least 150 minutes previously. Finally, addressing methodological deficiencies observed in previous studies, we propose new ways of robust benchmarking for future model extraction attacks.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Beyond Labeling Oracles: What does it mean to steal ML models?
Avital Shafran, Ilia Shumailov, Murat A. Erdogdu, Nicolas Papernot
Model extraction attacks are designed to steal trained models with only query access, as is often provided through APIs that ML-as-a-Service providers offer. Machine Learning (ML) models are expensive to train, in part because data is hard to obtain, and a primary incentive for model extraction is to acquire a model while incurring less cost than training from scratch. Literature on model extraction commonly claims or presumes that the attacker is able to save on both data acquisition and labeling costs. We thoroughly evaluate this assumption and find that the attacker often does not. This is because current attacks implicitly rely on the adversary being able to sample from the victim model's data distribution. We thoroughly research factors influencing the success of model extraction. We discover that prior knowledge of the attacker, i.e., access to in-distribution data, dominates other factors like the attack policy the adversary follows to choose which queries to make to the victim model API. Our findings urge the community to redefine the adversarial goals of ME attacks as current evaluation methods misinterpret the ME performance.
Read more6/14/2024
⛏️
0
Towards More Realistic Extraction Attacks: An Adversarial Perspective
Yash More, Prakhar Ganesh, Golnoosh Farnadi
Language models are prone to memorizing large parts of their training data, making them vulnerable to extraction attacks. Existing research on these attacks remains limited in scope, often studying isolated trends rather than the real-world interactions with these models. In this paper, we revisit extraction attacks from an adversarial perspective, exploiting the brittleness of language models. We find significant churn in extraction attack trends, i.e., even minor, unintuitive changes to the prompt, or targeting smaller models and older checkpoints, can exacerbate the risks of extraction by up to $2-4 times$. Moreover, relying solely on the widely accepted verbatim match underestimates the extent of extracted information, and we provide various alternatives to more accurately capture the true risks of extraction. We conclude our discussion with data deduplication, a commonly suggested mitigation strategy, and find that while it addresses some memorization concerns, it remains vulnerable to the same escalation of extraction risks against a real-world adversary. Our findings highlight the necessity of acknowledging an adversary's true capabilities to avoid underestimating extraction risks.
Read more7/4/2024