Harnessing Discrete Representations For Continual Reinforcement Learning

Overview

• This paper investigates the advantages of using vector-based categorical representations of observations, often referred to as discrete representations, in the context of reinforcement learning (RL).
• The authors evaluate the impact of discrete representations on world-model learning, model-free RL, and continual RL problems.
• The paper finds that discrete representations lead to more accurate world models with less capacity, better policy learning with less data, and faster adaptation in continual RL settings.
• The performance improvements are attributed to the information contained within the latent vectors and potentially the encoding of the discrete representation itself.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning where agents (like virtual robots) learn to make decisions by interacting with their environment and receiving rewards or punishments. These agents rely heavily on how they represent the information they observe from the environment.

Some recent breakthroughs in RL have used vector-based categorical representations of observations, which means they represent the environment as a set of discrete categories instead of continuous values. However, there hasn't been much research explicitly examining the benefits of using these discrete representations.

In this paper, the authors provide a thorough investigation of the advantages of using discrete representations in RL. They test this on three different types of RL problems: learning world models (internal representations of the environment), model-free RL (where the agent learns directly from experience), and continual RL (where the agent has to adapt to changing environments over time).

The key findings are:

• Discrete representations allow world models to accurately capture more of the environment using less capacity (memory/computation).
• Agents trained with discrete representations learn better policies (decision-making strategies) with less data.
• In continual RL, these benefits translate to agents that can adapt to changes in the environment faster.

The authors suggest these improvements are due to the information encoded in the discrete representation itself, as well as the latent (hidden) variables used to represent the environment.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by highlighting the importance of observation representations in reinforcement learning (RL). While some recent breakthroughs have used vector-based categorical (discrete) representations, there has been little research explicitly examining the benefits of this approach.

To investigate this, the authors conduct evaluations across three different RL problem settings:

1. World-model learning: The agents learn an internal model of the environment, which can then be used for planning and decision-making. The authors find that world models learned over discrete representations can accurately capture more of the world using less capacity (fewer parameters) compared to models trained on continuous representations.

2. Model-free RL: Agents learn directly from experience, without an explicit world model. The authors show that agents trained with discrete representations learn better policies (decision-making strategies) with less data compared to those with continuous representations.

3. Continual RL: Agents must adapt to changing environments over time. The benefits of discrete representations, as observed in the previous two settings, translate to faster adaptation in continual RL problems.

The authors' analysis suggests that the performance improvements can be attributed to the information encoded in the latent vectors of the discrete representation, as well as potentially the encoding process itself. They hypothesize that the discrete structure may allow for more efficient and effective representation of the relevant information for RL tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough empirical investigation of the advantages of using discrete representations in reinforcement learning. The authors' approach of evaluating across multiple RL problem settings is commendable, as it allows them to explore the broader implications of their findings.

One limitation mentioned in the paper is the reliance on relatively simple discrete representations, such as one-hot encodings. The authors acknowledge that more sophisticated discrete representation learning methods, like those used in vision-language models, may yield even greater benefits.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential downsides or trade-offs of using discrete representations. For example, it would be valuable to understand how discrete representations might perform in RL tasks with high-dimensional, continuous state spaces, or whether they introduce any challenges in terms of exploration or credit assignment.

Further research could also explore the connections between discrete representations and the issue of time discretization in RL, as well as the relationship between discrete representations and unsupervised representation learning in the context of RL.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for the advantages of using vector-based categorical (discrete) representations of observations in reinforcement learning. The authors demonstrate that discrete representations lead to more efficient world models, better policy learning with less data, and faster adaptation in continual RL settings.

These findings have important implications for the design of RL agents, particularly in domains where sample efficiency, interpretability, or adaptability are crucial. The insights from this research could inspire further developments in implicit quantization and other discrete representation learning techniques, potentially unlocking new breakthroughs in reinforcement learning and beyond.