An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores an idiosyncrasy in how time is discretized in reinforcement learning (RL)
- Investigates the impact of different time discretization approaches on the definition and computation of the return, which is a key concept in RL
- Demonstrates that the choice of time discretization can lead to significantly different results, even when the underlying continuous-time dynamics are the same
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning where an agent, like a robot or a computer program, learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. In RL, the "return" is a measure of how well the agent is doing - the higher the return, the better the agent is performing.
This paper looks at an interesting quirk that can arise when RL systems are implemented on computers. Computers operate in discrete time steps, but the real world is continuous. The researchers found that the way you choose to discretize time - that is, how you divide the continuous time into separate steps - can have a big impact on the calculated return, even if the underlying dynamics of the system are the same.
They provide examples to show how different time discretization approaches can lead to very different results, even when the real-world system being modeled is the same. This is an important issue to be aware of when designing and evaluating RL systems, as the choice of time discretization could significantly impact the performance and behavior of the agent.
The key insight is that the discretization of time is not a trivial decision in RL, and can have profound effects on the learning process and the final performance of the agent. Researchers and practitioners working on RL need to be mindful of this when designing their systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates an "idiosyncrasy" that arises from the time discretization process in reinforcement learning (When to sense, when to control: a time-adaptive approach). In RL, the agent's interaction with the environment is typically modeled in discrete time steps (How to discretize continuous state-action spaces), but the underlying dynamics of the real-world system being modeled are continuous in time.
The researchers show that the choice of time discretization can have a significant impact on the definition and computation of the "return" - a key concept in RL that represents the total cumulative reward an agent receives (Adaptive discretization-based non-episodic reinforcement learning). They provide examples demonstrating that different discretization approaches can lead to vastly different return values, even when the underlying continuous-time dynamics are the same.
This is an important issue to consider, as the return is a fundamental quantity used to guide the agent's learning and decision-making (Note on continuous-time online learning). The idiosyncrasy highlighted in this paper suggests that the choice of time discretization can have profound effects on the behavior and performance of RL agents (Non-ergodicity in reinforcement learning: Robustness via ergodicity).
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-reasoned analysis of an important issue in reinforcement learning. The researchers demonstrate convincingly that the choice of time discretization can have a significant impact on the computation of the return, which is a crucial quantity in RL systems.
One limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on simple, illustrative examples rather than more complex, real-world scenarios. While the examples are effective in highlighting the idiosyncrasy, it would be valuable to see an analysis of how this issue manifests in larger-scale, practical RL applications.
Additionally, the paper does not provide explicit guidance on how to address this problem. While it raises awareness of the issue, more research may be needed to develop principled approaches for selecting appropriate time discretization methods that minimize the impact on RL performance.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by uncovering a subtle but consequential problem in reinforcement learning. It encourages researchers and practitioners to think critically about the implications of time discretization and its effects on the fundamental concepts and algorithms in RL.
Conclusion
This paper uncovers an interesting idiosyncrasy in how time is discretized in reinforcement learning. It demonstrates that the choice of time discretization can have a significant impact on the definition and computation of the return, a key metric used to guide the agent's learning and decision-making.
The findings of this work suggest that researchers and practitioners working on RL need to be mindful of the time discretization process and its potential effects on the performance and behavior of their systems. While the paper focuses on simple examples, the implications extend to more complex, real-world RL applications.
Overall, this work highlights an important issue that deserves further attention and research. By understanding the nuances of time discretization in RL, the field can develop more robust and reliable algorithms that can better capture the continuous-time dynamics of the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning
Kris De Asis, Richard S. Sutton
Many reinforcement learning algorithms are built on an assumption that an agent interacts with an environment over fixed-duration, discrete time steps. However, physical systems are continuous in time, requiring a choice of time-discretization granularity when digitally controlling them. Furthermore, such systems do not wait for decisions to be made before advancing the environment state, necessitating the study of how the choice of discretization may affect a reinforcement learning algorithm. In this work, we consider the relationship between the definitions of the continuous-time and discrete-time returns. Specifically, we acknowledge an idiosyncrasy with naively applying a discrete-time algorithm to a discretized continuous-time environment, and note how a simple modification can better align the return definitions. This observation is of practical consideration when dealing with environments where time-discretization granularity is a choice, or situations where such granularity is inherently stochastic.
Read more9/4/2024
0
When to Sense and Control? A Time-adaptive Approach for Continuous-Time RL
Lenart Treven, Bhavya Sukhija, Yarden As, Florian Dorfler, Andreas Krause
Reinforcement learning (RL) excels in optimizing policies for discrete-time Markov decision processes (MDP). However, various systems are inherently continuous in time, making discrete-time MDPs an inexact modeling choice. In many applications, such as greenhouse control or medical treatments, each interaction (measurement or switching of action) involves manual intervention and thus is inherently costly. Therefore, we generally prefer a time-adaptive approach with fewer interactions with the system. In this work, we formalize an RL framework, Time-adaptive Control & Sensing (TaCoS), that tackles this challenge by optimizing over policies that besides control predict the duration of its application. Our formulation results in an extended MDP that any standard RL algorithm can solve. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art RL algorithms trained on TaCoS drastically reduce the interaction amount over their discrete-time counterpart while retaining the same or improved performance, and exhibiting robustness over discretization frequency. Finally, we propose OTaCoS, an efficient model-based algorithm for our setting. We show that OTaCoS enjoys sublinear regret for systems with sufficiently smooth dynamics and empirically results in further sample-efficiency gains.
Read more6/5/2024
🏅
0
Harnessing Discrete Representations For Continual Reinforcement Learning
Edan Meyer, Adam White, Marlos C. Machado
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents make decisions using nothing but observations from the environment, and consequently, heavily rely on the representations of those observations. Though some recent breakthroughs have used vector-based categorical representations of observations, often referred to as discrete representations, there is little work explicitly assessing the significance of such a choice. In this work, we provide a thorough empirical investigation of the advantages of representing observations as vectors of categorical values within the context of reinforcement learning. We perform evaluations on world-model learning, model-free RL, and ultimately continual RL problems, where the benefits best align with the needs of the problem setting. We find that, when compared to traditional continuous representations, world models learned over discrete representations accurately model more of the world with less capacity, and that agents trained with discrete representations learn better policies with less data. In the context of continual RL, these benefits translate into faster adapting agents. Additionally, our analysis suggests that the observed performance improvements can be attributed to the information contained within the latent vectors and potentially the encoding of the discrete representation itself.
Read more7/16/2024
0
On Bellman equations for continuous-time policy evaluation I: discretization and approximation
Wenlong Mou, Yuhua Zhu
We study the problem of computing the value function from a discretely-observed trajectory of a continuous-time diffusion process. We develop a new class of algorithms based on easily implementable numerical schemes that are compatible with discrete-time reinforcement learning (RL) with function approximation. We establish high-order numerical accuracy as well as the approximation error guarantees for the proposed approach. In contrast to discrete-time RL problems where the approximation factor depends on the effective horizon, we obtain a bounded approximation factor using the underlying elliptic structures, even if the effective horizon diverges to infinity.
Read more7/9/2024