Have You Merged My Model? On The Robustness of Large Language Model IP Protection Methods Against Model Merging
2404.05188
0
0
💬
Abstract
Model merging is a promising lightweight model empowerment technique that does not rely on expensive computing devices (e.g., GPUs) or require the collection of specific training data. Instead, it involves editing different upstream model parameters to absorb their downstream task capabilities. However, uncertified model merging can infringe upon the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of the original upstream models. In this paper, we conduct the first study on the robustness of IP protection methods in model merging scenarios. We investigate two state-of-the-art IP protection techniques: Quantization Watermarking and Instructional Fingerprint, along with various advanced model merging technologies, such as Task Arithmetic, TIES-MERGING, and so on. Experimental results indicate that current Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking techniques cannot survive in the merged models, whereas model fingerprinting techniques can. Our research aims to highlight that model merging should be an indispensable consideration in the robustness assessment of model IP protection techniques, thereby promoting the healthy development of the open-source LLM community.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the robustness of intellectual property (IP) protection methods in the context of model merging, a technique for combining different machine learning models.
- The researchers investigate two state-of-the-art IP protection methods - Quantization Watermarking and Instructional Fingerprint - and how they fare against various model merging technologies, such as Task Arithmetic and TIES-MERGING.
- The findings suggest that current Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking techniques are not robust to model merging, while model fingerprinting techniques can better withstand this process.
Plain English Explanation
Model merging is a technique that allows machine learning models to be combined, absorbing the capabilities of different upstream models. This can be a useful way to create new models without the need for expensive computing power or gathering large datasets. However, merging models in this way can potentially infringe on the intellectual property (IP) rights of the original models.
The researchers in this paper wanted to investigate how effective current IP protection methods are when models are merged. They looked at two main techniques: watermarking and fingerprinting. Watermarking involves embedding a unique identifier into the model, while fingerprinting creates a distinctive pattern in the model's behavior.
The researchers tested these IP protection methods against different model merging technologies. They found that the watermarking techniques were not able to survive the merging process, meaning the original model's IP could be lost. On the other hand, the fingerprinting techniques were more robust and could still identify the original models even after merging.
The key takeaway is that model merging is an important factor to consider when developing IP protection for machine learning models. As this technology becomes more widely used, it's important to ensure the original creators' rights are protected, so the open-source machine learning community can continue to thrive.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the robustness of IP protection methods in the context of model merging, a technique that combines different upstream model parameters to absorb their downstream task capabilities. The researchers examine two state-of-the-art IP protection techniques: Quantization Watermarking and Instructional Fingerprint, along with various advanced model merging technologies, such as Task Arithmetic and TIES-MERGING.
The experimental results indicate that current Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking techniques cannot survive in the merged models, whereas model fingerprinting techniques can. This suggests that model merging should be considered an essential factor in the robustness assessment of model IP protection techniques, as it can potentially compromise the effectiveness of watermarking methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights an important consideration in the development of IP protection for machine learning models. As model merging becomes more prevalent, it is crucial to ensure that the original creators' rights are protected, as uncertified model merging can infringe upon their intellectual property.
While the findings suggest that fingerprinting techniques are more robust to model merging than watermarking, the researchers acknowledge that further research is needed to fully understand the implications and potential limitations of these methods. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges or drawbacks of model merging itself, which could be an area for future exploration.
It is also worth noting that the evaluation in this paper is limited to specific IP protection and model merging techniques, and the generalizability of the results to other methods or scenarios may require further investigation. As the field of machine learning continues to evolve, it will be essential for researchers and practitioners to stay vigilant and critically assess the effectiveness of IP protection approaches, especially in the face of emerging model empowerment techniques.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the robustness of IP protection methods in the context of model merging, a promising lightweight model empowerment technique. The findings suggest that current watermarking techniques may not be sufficient to protect the intellectual property of original models, while fingerprinting methods appear to be more resilient.
This research highlights the importance of considering model merging as a critical factor in the development and assessment of IP protection techniques for machine learning models. As the open-source LLM community continues to grow, ensuring the protection of creators' rights will be essential for the healthy and sustainable development of the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
Learnable Linguistic Watermarks for Tracing Model Extraction Attacks on Large Language Models
Minhao Bai, Kaiyi Pang, Yongfeng Huang
0
0
In the rapidly evolving domain of artificial intelligence, safeguarding the intellectual property of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly crucial. Current watermarking techniques against model extraction attacks, which rely on signal insertion in model logits or post-processing of generated text, remain largely heuristic. We propose a novel method for embedding learnable linguistic watermarks in LLMs, aimed at tracing and preventing model extraction attacks. Our approach subtly modifies the LLM's output distribution by introducing controlled noise into token frequency distributions, embedding an statistically identifiable controllable watermark.We leverage statistical hypothesis testing and information theory, particularly focusing on Kullback-Leibler Divergence, to differentiate between original and modified distributions effectively. Our watermarking method strikes a delicate well balance between robustness and output quality, maintaining low false positive/negative rates and preserving the LLM's original performance.
5/3/2024
💬
Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Models
Jiashu Xu, Fei Wang, Mingyu Derek Ma, Pang Wei Koh, Chaowei Xiao, Muhao Chen
0
0
The exorbitant cost of training Large language models (LLMs) from scratch makes it essential to fingerprint the models to protect intellectual property via ownership authentication and to ensure downstream users and developers comply with their license terms (e.g. restricting commercial use). In this study, we present a pilot study on LLM fingerprinting as a form of very lightweight instruction tuning. Model publisher specifies a confidential private key and implants it as an instruction backdoor that causes the LLM to generate specific text when the key is present. Results on 11 popularly-used LLMs showed that this approach is lightweight and does not affect the normal behavior of the model. It also prevents publisher overclaim, maintains robustness against fingerprint guessing and parameter-efficient training, and supports multi-stage fingerprinting akin to MIT License. Code is available in https://cnut1648.github.io/Model-Fingerprint/.
4/4/2024
💬
Large Language Model Watermark Stealing With Mixed Integer Programming
Zhaoxi Zhang, Xiaomei Zhang, Yanjun Zhang, Leo Yu Zhang, Chao Chen, Shengshan Hu, Asif Gill, Shirui Pan
0
0
The Large Language Model (LLM) watermark is a newly emerging technique that shows promise in addressing concerns surrounding LLM copyright, monitoring AI-generated text, and preventing its misuse. The LLM watermark scheme commonly includes generating secret keys to partition the vocabulary into green and red lists, applying a perturbation to the logits of tokens in the green list to increase their sampling likelihood, thus facilitating watermark detection to identify AI-generated text if the proportion of green tokens exceeds a threshold. However, recent research indicates that watermarking methods using numerous keys are susceptible to removal attacks, such as token editing, synonym substitution, and paraphrasing, with robustness declining as the number of keys increases. Therefore, the state-of-the-art watermark schemes that employ fewer or single keys have been demonstrated to be more robust against text editing and paraphrasing. In this paper, we propose a novel green list stealing attack against the state-of-the-art LLM watermark scheme and systematically examine its vulnerability to this attack. We formalize the attack as a mixed integer programming problem with constraints. We evaluate our attack under a comprehensive threat model, including an extreme scenario where the attacker has no prior knowledge, lacks access to the watermark detector API, and possesses no information about the LLM's parameter settings or watermark injection/detection scheme. Extensive experiments on LLMs, such as OPT and LLaMA, demonstrate that our attack can successfully steal the green list and remove the watermark across all settings.
5/31/2024
Here's a Free Lunch: Sanitizing Backdoored Models with Model Merge
Ansh Arora, Xuanli He, Maximilian Mozes, Srinibas Swain, Mark Dras, Qiongkai Xu
0
0
The democratization of pre-trained language models through open-source initiatives has rapidly advanced innovation and expanded access to cutting-edge technologies. However, this openness also brings significant security risks, including backdoor attacks, where hidden malicious behaviors are triggered by specific inputs, compromising natural language processing (NLP) system integrity and reliability. This paper suggests that merging a backdoored model with other homogeneous models can significantly remediate backdoor vulnerabilities even if such models are not entirely secure. In our experiments, we verify our hypothesis on various models (BERT-Base, RoBERTa-Large, Llama2-7B, and Mistral-7B) and datasets (SST-2, OLID, AG News, and QNLI). Compared to multiple advanced defensive approaches, our method offers an effective and efficient inference-stage defense against backdoor attacks on classification and instruction-tuned tasks without additional resources or specific knowledge. Our approach consistently outperforms recent advanced baselines, leading to an average of about 75% reduction in the attack success rate. Since model merging has been an established approach for improving model performance, the extra advantage it provides regarding defense can be seen as a cost-free bonus.
6/4/2024