Having Second Thoughts? Let's hear it
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the phenomenon of "having second thoughts" and explores ways to capture this in natural language processing models.
- It examines the challenges of detecting second thoughts or changes of opinion in text and proposes an approach to address this.
- The research aims to improve the ability of AI systems to understand and respond appropriately to instances where humans express second thoughts or reconsider their views.
Plain English Explanation
Sometimes people change their minds or have second thoughts about something they've said or written. This can be difficult for AI language models to detect, as the shifts in opinion may be subtle or buried in the text.
The researchers behind this paper set out to develop a way for AI systems to better identify when humans are having second thoughts. This could be useful in conversations, customer service, or other applications where it's important for the AI to understand if someone is reconsidering their initial stance.
Their approach involves analyzing a dataset of normal text as well as examples where people have clearly changed their minds. By studying the linguistic patterns in these "second thought" cases, the researchers hope to train AI models to recognize similar signals in real-world interactions. This could help the AI provide more empathetic and appropriate responses when someone is thinking through an issue out loud.
Ultimately, the goal is for AI to engage more naturally with humans and have a better grasp of the nuances of human communication, including when someone is having a change of heart about something they've said.
Technical Explanation
The paper first establishes a "normal" dataset of text to serve as a baseline. This allows the researchers to compare linguistic patterns in regular communication against instances where the writer is expressing second thoughts or reconsidering their position.
To create the "second thought" dataset, the authors draw from sources like customer reviews, social media posts, and online discussion forums. They identify examples where the writer clearly indicates they're having second thoughts, often through the use of phrases like "on second thought" or "I take that back."
By analyzing the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features of these second thought examples, the researchers aim to develop a model that can reliably detect similar shifts in opinion, even when they're not explicitly stated. This could involve looking for changes in sentiment, modality, or the use of certain discourse markers.
The ultimate goal is to train an AI system that can engage in more nuanced and empathetic communication by recognizing when humans are reconsidering their views. This could have applications in areas like customer service, mental health support, or AI tutoring systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and potentially impactful approach to a relatively underexplored challenge in natural language processing. Detecting second thoughts and changes of opinion is an important capability for AI systems that interact with humans in open-ended ways.
However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their work. The dataset they've assembled, while valuable, may not fully capture the rich diversity of how second thoughts are expressed in real-world language. There could also be cultural or individual differences in how people signal uncertainty or reconsideration.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or ethical concerns that could arise from an AI system making judgments about someone's inner thought processes. There may be a risk of misinterpretation or overreach if the technology is not deployed thoughtfully.
Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of this approach and to better understand the social and psychological dynamics at play when people express second thoughts. Careful consideration of the implications for human-AI interaction will also be crucial as this technology evolves.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising step towards developing AI systems that can more accurately detect and respond to instances of second thoughts or changes of opinion in human communication. By studying the linguistic patterns associated with reconsidering one's views, the researchers aim to enhance the ability of AI to engage in more nuanced, empathetic, and natural interactions.
While the work has limitations and raises important ethical considerations, the overall approach has the potential to significantly improve the capacity of AI to understand and adapt to the complexities of human expression. As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, this research offers valuable insights into an underexplored but consequential aspect of how people communicate.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Having Second Thoughts? Let's hear it
Jung H. Lee, Sujith Vijayan
Deep learning models loosely mimic bottom-up signal pathways from low-order sensory areas to high-order cognitive areas. After training, DL models can outperform humans on some domain-specific tasks, but their decision-making process has been known to be easily disrupted. Since the human brain consists of multiple functional areas highly connected to one another and relies on intricate interplays between bottom-up and top-down (from high-order to low-order areas) processing, we hypothesize that incorporating top-down signal processing may make DL models more robust. To address this hypothesis, we propose a certification process mimicking selective attention and test if it could make DL models more robust. Our empirical evaluations suggest that this newly proposed certification can improve DL models' accuracy and help us build safety measures to alleviate their vulnerabilities with both artificial and natural adversarial examples.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Searching for internal symbols underlying deep learning
Jung H. Lee, Sujith Vijayan
Deep learning (DL) enables deep neural networks (DNNs) to automatically learn complex tasks or rules from given examples without instructions or guiding principles. As we do not engineer DNNs' functions, it is extremely difficult to diagnose their decisions, and multiple lines of studies proposed to explain principles of DNNs/DL operations. Notably, one line of studies suggests that DNNs may learn concepts, the high level features recognizable to humans. Thus, we hypothesized that DNNs develop abstract codes, not necessarily recognizable to humans, which can be used to augment DNNs' decision-making. To address this hypothesis, we combined foundation segmentation models and unsupervised learning to extract internal codes and identify potential use of abstract codes to make DL's decision-making more reliable and safer.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Dual Thinking and Perceptual Analysis of Deep Learning Models using Human Adversarial Examples
Kailas Dayanandan, Anand Sinha, Brejesh Lall
The dual thinking framework considers fast, intuitive processing and slower, logical processing. The perception of dual thinking in vision requires images where inferences from intuitive and logical processing differ. We introduce an adversarial dataset to provide evidence for the dual thinking framework in human vision, which also aids in studying the qualitative behavior of deep learning models. Our study also addresses a major criticism of using classification models as computational models of human vision by using instance segmentation models that localize objects. The evidence underscores the importance of shape in identifying instances in human vision and shows that deep learning models lack an understanding of sub-structures, as indicated by errors related to the position and number of sub-components. Additionally, the similarity in errors made by models and intuitive human processing indicates that models only address intuitive thinking in human vision.
Read more6/12/2024
🧠
0
Towards Neural Network based Cognitive Models of Dynamic Decision-Making by Humans
Changyu Chen, Shashank Reddy Chirra, Maria Jos'e Ferreira, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Arunesh Sinha, Pradeep Varakantham
Modeling human cognitive processes in dynamic decision-making tasks has been an endeavor in AI for a long time because such models can help make AI systems more intuitive, personalized, mitigate any human biases, and enhance training in simulation. Some initial work has attempted to utilize neural networks (and large language models) but often assumes one common model for all humans and aims to emulate human behavior in aggregate. However, the behavior of each human is distinct, heterogeneous, and relies on specific past experiences in certain tasks. For instance, consider two individuals responding to a phishing email: one who has previously encountered and identified similar threats may recognize it quickly, while another without such experience might fall for the scam. In this work, we build on Instance Based Learning (IBL) that posits that human decisions are based on similar situations encountered in the past. However, IBL relies on simple fixed form functions to capture the mapping from past situations to current decisions. To that end, we propose two new attention-based neural network models to have open form non-linear functions to model distinct and heterogeneous human decision-making in dynamic settings. We experiment with two distinct datasets gathered from human subject experiment data, one focusing on detection of phishing email by humans and another where humans act as attackers in a cybersecurity setting and decide on an attack option. We conducted extensive experiments with our two neural network models, IBL, and GPT3.5, and demonstrate that the neural network models outperform IBL significantly in representing human decision-making, while providing similar interpretability of human decisions as IBL. Overall, our work yields promising results for further use of neural networks in cognitive modeling of human decision making.
Read more9/6/2024