Towards Neural Network based Cognitive Models of Dynamic Decision-Making by Humans

Overview

• The paper explores using neural networks to model human decision-making in dynamic settings.
• It builds on the Instance-Based Learning (IBL) model of cognition, which suggests decisions are made based on similar past experiences.
• The authors propose two new attention-based neural network models and test them on datasets involving human detection of phishing emails and cybersecurity attacks.
• The neural network models are compared to IBL and GPT-3.5, with one of the new models showing the best performance in representing human decision-making.
• The paper finds that all models predict a human's decision better if that human is better at the task.
• The work aims to yield promising results for further use of neural networks in cognitive modeling of human decision-making.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at using neural networks to understand how humans make decisions in dynamic situations. It builds on a well-known model called Instance-Based Learning (IBL), which suggests that people make decisions based on similar experiences they've had in the past.

The researchers developed two new neural network models that use attention mechanisms to try to capture this idea of basing decisions on past experiences. They tested these models on two different datasets - one where people had to detect phishing emails, and another where people played the role of attackers in a cybersecurity scenario.

The researchers compared the performance of their neural network models to the IBL model and also to GPT-3.5, a large language model. They found that one of their new neural network models performed the best at representing how humans actually make decisions in these dynamic settings.

An interesting finding was that all the models were better able to predict a person's decision if that person was generally better at the task. The researchers think this work shows promise for using neural networks to better understand the cognitive processes involved in human decision-making.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes two new neural network models, Neuro-Cognitive Model for Human Decision-Making (NCM-HDM) and Attention-based Neuro-Cognitive Model for Human Decision-Making (ANCM-HDM), to represent human decision-making in dynamic settings. These models are inspired by the Instance-Based Learning (IBL) theory of cognition, which suggests that decisions are made based on the similarity of the current situation to past experiences.

The NCM-HDM model uses a feedforward neural network with attention mechanisms to selectively focus on relevant past instances when making a decision. The ANCM-HDM model extends this by incorporating additional attention layers to better capture the dynamic nature of decision-making.

The researchers evaluated these models on two datasets:

1. Phishing Email Detection: Human subjects were shown emails and asked to decide if they were phishing attempts or not.
2. Cyber-Attack Scenario: Human subjects played the role of attackers and chose attack options in a cybersecurity setting.

The performance of the NCM-HDM and ANCM-HDM models was compared to the IBL model and the GPT-3.5 language model. The results showed that the ANCM-HDM model achieved the best performance in representing human decision-making across both datasets.

An interesting finding was that all the models predicted a human's decision better if that human was better at the task overall. The researchers also explored explanations for the human decisions based on what their models considered important for the predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to modeling human decision-making using neural networks. By building on the well-established IBL theory of cognition and incorporating attention mechanisms, the proposed models seem to capture important aspects of how humans make decisions in dynamic settings.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the research. For example, it's unclear how generalizable the findings are, as the experiments were conducted on relatively narrow datasets. It would be interesting to see how the models perform on a wider range of decision-making tasks.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or confounding factors in the human subject data used to train and evaluate the models. It's possible that individual differences in decision-making strategies or past experiences could be driving some of the observed patterns, rather than the models themselves.

Further research could also explore the interpretability of the models' decision-making processes. While the paper touches on this, a more in-depth analysis of the specific factors the models consider important could yield valuable insights into the cognitive processes underlying human decision-making.

Conclusion

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach to modeling human decision-making using neural networks. The proposed models, particularly the ANCM-HDM, show strong performance in representing how humans make decisions in dynamic settings.

The findings suggest that neural networks can be effectively used to capture the cognitive processes involved in human decision-making, which could have important implications for fields like human-AI collaboration and understanding human behavior. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader applicability of the approach.