Hi. I'm Molly, Your Virtual Interviewer! -- Exploring the Impact of Race and Gender in AI-powered Virtual Interview Experiences
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the impact of race and gender on user experiences with AI-powered virtual interview assistants.
- The researchers conducted experiments to understand how the appearance and identity of the virtual interviewer affects user perceptions and behaviors.
- The findings provide insights into the role of anthropomorphic AI agents in shaping user impressions and interactions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how the race and gender of an AI-powered virtual interviewer can influence the experiences of people using it. The researchers ran experiments to see how the appearance and identity of the virtual interviewer impacts the way users perceive and interact with it.
The key findings from the study provide important insights into how anthropomorphic AI agents - those designed to have human-like qualities - can shape user impressions and behaviors. This has implications for the design and deployment of AI assistants, especially in sensitive contexts like job interviews.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to examine the impact of the virtual interviewer's race and gender on user experiences. They created different versions of the interviewer, varying its appearance and identity, and had participants interact with these versions.
The experiment design involved measuring factors like user trust, engagement, and impressions of the interviewer's competence. The researchers also looked at how the user's own race and gender influenced their reactions to the different interviewer versions.
The results suggest that the race and gender of the virtual interviewer can significantly impact the user experience. Participants tended to have more positive impressions and interactions with interviewers whose race and gender matched their own.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights, but also acknowledges some limitations. The experiments were conducted in a controlled lab setting, which may not fully capture real-world interview scenarios. Additionally, the sample size and demographic diversity of participants could be expanded to further validate the findings.
It's also important to consider potential ethical concerns around the use of anthropomorphic AI agents in high-stakes contexts like job interviews. There are risks of introducing unintended biases and perpetuating societal stereotypes that should be carefully addressed.
Conclusion
This research highlights the significant impact that the race and gender of AI-powered virtual interviewers can have on user experiences. The findings suggest the need for thoughtful design and deployment of such systems to ensure fairness, inclusivity, and positive outcomes for all users.
As AI becomes more pervasive in our lives, understanding and mitigating the social and psychological effects of anthropomorphic AI agents will be crucial. This paper contributes important insights that can inform the development of ethical and equitable AI-powered technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Hi. I'm Molly, Your Virtual Interviewer! -- Exploring the Impact of Race and Gender in AI-powered Virtual Interview Experiences
Shreyan Biswas, Ji-Youn Jung, Abhishek Unnam, Kuldeep Yadav, Shreyansh Gupta, Ujwal Gadiraju
The persistent issue of human bias in recruitment processes poses a formidable challenge to achieving equitable hiring practices, particularly when influenced by demographic characteristics such as gender and race of both interviewers and candidates. Asynchronous Video Interviews (AVIs), powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), have emerged as innovative tools aimed at streamlining the application screening process while potentially mitigating the impact of such biases. These AI-driven platforms present an opportunity to customize the demographic features of virtual interviewers to align with diverse applicant preferences, promising a more objective and fair evaluation. Despite their growing adoption, the implications of virtual interviewer identities on candidate experiences within AVIs remain underexplored. We aim to address this research and empirical gap in this paper. To this end, we carried out a comprehensive between-subjects study involving 218 participants across six distinct experimental conditions, manipulating the gender and skin color of an AI virtual interviewer agent. Our empirical analysis revealed that while the demographic attributes of the agents did not significantly influence the overall experience of interviewees, variations in the interviewees' demographics significantly altered their perception of the AVI process. Further, we uncovered that the mediating roles of Social Presence and Perception of the virtual interviewer critically affect interviewees' perceptions of fairness (+), privacy (-), and impression management (+).
Read more8/27/2024
0
The Impacts of AI Avatar Appearance and Disclosure on User Motivation
Boele Visser, Peter van der Putten, Amirhossein Zohrehvand
This study examines the influence of perceived AI features on user motivation in virtual interactions. AI avatars, being disclosed as being an AI, or embodying specific genders, could be used in user-AI interactions. Leveraging insights from AI and avatar research, we explore how AI disclosure and gender affect user motivation. We conducted a game-based experiment involving over 72,500 participants who solved search problems alone or with an AI companion. Different groups experienced varying AI appearances and disclosures. We measured play intensity. Results revealed that the presence of another avatar led to less intense play compared to solo play. Disclosure of the avatar as AI heightened effort intensity compared to non-disclosed AI companions. Additionally, a masculine AI appearance reduced effort intensity.
Read more8/1/2024
0
AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization
Nouar AlDahoul, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki
Text-to-image generative AI models such as Stable Diffusion are used daily by millions worldwide. However, the extent to which these models exhibit racial and gender stereotypes is not yet fully understood. Here, we document significant biases in Stable Diffusion across six races, two genders, 32 professions, and eight attributes. Additionally, we examine the degree to which Stable Diffusion depicts individuals of the same race as being similar to one another. This analysis reveals significant racial homogenization, e.g., depicting nearly all middle eastern men as dark-skinned, bearded, and wearing a traditional headdress. We then propose novel debiasing solutions that address the above stereotypes. Finally, using a preregistered experiment, we show that being presented with inclusive AI-generated faces reduces people's racial and gender biases, while being presented with non-inclusive ones increases such biases. This persists regardless of whether the images are labeled as AI-generated. Taken together, our findings emphasize the need to address biases and stereotypes in AI-generated content.
Read more5/13/2024
0
Artificial social influence via human-embodied AI agent interaction in immersive virtual reality (VR): Effects of similarity-matching during health conversations
Sue Lim, Ralf Schmalzle, Gary Bente
Interactions with artificial intelligence (AI) based agents can positively influence human behavior and judgment. However, studies to date focus on text-based conversational agents (CA) with limited embodiment, restricting our understanding of how social influence principles, such as similarity, apply to AI agents (i.e., artificial social influence). We address this gap by leveraging the latest advances in AI (language models) and combining them with immersive virtual reality (VR). Specifically, we built VR-ECAs, or embodied conversational agents that can naturally converse with humans about health-related topics in a virtual environment. Then we manipulated interpersonal similarity via gender matching and examined its effects on biobehavioral (i.e., gaze), social (e.g., agent likeability), and behavioral outcomes (i.e., healthy snack selection). We found an interesting interaction effect between agent and participant gender on biobehavioral outcomes: discussing health with opposite-gender agents tended to enhance gaze duration, with the effect stronger for male participants compared to their female counterparts. A similar directional pattern was observed for healthy snack selection, though it was not statistically significant. In addition, female participants liked the VR-ECAs more than their male counterparts, regardless of the gender of the VR-ECAs. Finally, participants experienced greater presence while conversing with VR-embodied agents than chatting with text-only agents. Overall, our findings highlight embodiment as a crucial factor of influence of AI on human behavior, and our paradigm enables new experimental research at the intersection of social influence, human-AI communication, and immersive virtual reality (VR).
Read more9/16/2024