Hidden in Plain Sight: Undetectable Adversarial Bias Attacks on Vulnerable Patient Populations
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates the risk of deep learning (DL) models in radiology exacerbating clinical biases towards vulnerable patient populations.
- Prior research has focused on quantifying biases in trained DL models, but this study explores the impact of demographically targeted adversarial bias attacks on DL models in clinical environments.
- The authors demonstrate that these adversarial bias attacks can introduce undetectable underdiagnosis bias in DL models, with high selectivity for the targeted demographic groups.
- The results indicate that these biased DL models can propagate prediction bias even when evaluated with external datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is concerned with the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) models in radiology to unfairly disadvantage certain patient groups, such as by underdiagnosing certain conditions. Previous research has looked at identifying biases in these AI models, but this study goes a step further by showing how attackers could intentionally introduce biases that are hard to detect.
The researchers demonstrate that by poisoning the training data with targeted false labels, they can create AI models that perform poorly at diagnosing certain demographic groups, like older patients or women, without affecting the overall performance. This means these biased models could still be seen as accurate on average, even though they are letting down specific vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, the authors find that these biased models retain their unfair tendencies even when tested on completely new datasets, suggesting the biases could spread and become entrenched. This is a concerning result, as it means these types of adversarial attacks could undermine the reliability of AI systems in clinical settings if left unchecked.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the potential for demographically targeted adversarial bias attacks to introduce undetectable underdiagnosis bias in deep learning (DL) models used in radiology. The authors demonstrate that by poisoning the training data with false labels targeted at specific demographic groups, they can degrade the performance of DL models on those groups without impacting overall model performance.
Through experiments across multiple performance metrics and demographic factors like sex and age, the researchers show that these adversarial bias attacks exhibit high selectivity, significantly impairing model performance for the targeted group while leaving the overall model accuracy intact. Crucially, they find that these biased DL models continue to propagate prediction bias even when evaluated on external datasets, suggesting the potential for these unfair tendencies to become entrenched.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of the risks posed by adversarial bias attacks on DL models in clinical settings. By revealing how such attacks can introduce undetectable biases, the authors highlight an important area for further research and mitigation efforts.
However, the study is limited to a specific type of attack (label poisoning) and may not capture the full scope of adversarial threats facing DL models in radiology. Additionally, while the results indicate the potential for biased models to spread, more research is needed to understand the real-world implications and the effectiveness of potential countermeasures.
It would be valuable for future work to explore a wider range of attack vectors, as well as investigate how interpretable AI techniques could be used to detect and mitigate such biases. Nonetheless, this paper serves as an important wake-up call for the AI research community to prioritize the development of robust, fair, and transparent DL models for high-stakes applications like healthcare.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the critical need to address the risk of deep learning models in radiology exacerbating clinical biases towards vulnerable patient populations. The authors demonstrate that demographically targeted adversarial bias attacks can introduce undetectable underdiagnosis biases in DL models, with the potential for these biases to propagate and become entrenched. This is a concerning finding that underscores the importance of developing robust, fair, and transparent AI systems for clinical applications. Continued research and mitigation efforts in this area are crucial to ensure the equitable deployment of AI in the healthcare sector.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
Hidden in Plain Sight: Undetectable Adversarial Bias Attacks on Vulnerable Patient Populations
Pranav Kulkarni, Andrew Chan, Nithya Navarathna, Skylar Chan, Paul H. Yi, Vishwa S. Parekh
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has shed light on the risk of deep learning (DL) models exacerbating clinical biases towards vulnerable patient populations. While prior literature has focused on quantifying biases exhibited by trained DL models, demographically targeted adversarial bias attacks on DL models and its implication in the clinical environment remains an underexplored field of research in medical imaging. In this work, we demonstrate that demographically targeted label poisoning attacks can introduce undetectable underdiagnosis bias in DL models. Our results across multiple performance metrics and demographic groups like sex, age, and their intersectional subgroups show that adversarial bias attacks demonstrate high-selectivity for bias in the targeted group by degrading group model performance without impacting overall model performance. Furthermore, our results indicate that adversarial bias attacks result in biased DL models that propagate prediction bias even when evaluated with external datasets.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Securing the Diagnosis of Medical Imaging: An In-depth Analysis of AI-Resistant Attacks
Angona Biswas, MD Abdullah Al Nasim, Kishor Datta Gupta, Roy George, Abdur Rashid
Machine learning (ML) is a rapidly developing area of medicine that uses significant resources to apply computer science and statistics to medical issues. ML's proponents laud its capacity to handle vast, complicated, and erratic medical data. It's common knowledge that attackers might cause misclassification by deliberately creating inputs for machine learning classifiers. Research on adversarial examples has been extensively conducted in the field of computer vision applications. Healthcare systems are thought to be highly difficult because of the security and life-or-death considerations they include, and performance accuracy is very important. Recent arguments have suggested that adversarial attacks could be made against medical image analysis (MedIA) technologies because of the accompanying technology infrastructure and powerful financial incentives. Since the diagnosis will be the basis for important decisions, it is essential to assess how strong medical DNN tasks are against adversarial attacks. Simple adversarial attacks have been taken into account in several earlier studies. However, DNNs are susceptible to more risky and realistic attacks. The present paper covers recent proposed adversarial attack strategies against DNNs for medical imaging as well as countermeasures. In this study, we review current techniques for adversarial imaging attacks, detections. It also encompasses various facets of these techniques and offers suggestions for the robustness of neural networks to be improved in the future.
Read more8/2/2024
🌐
0
Towards objective and systematic evaluation of bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging
Emma A. M. Stanley, Raissa Souza, Anthony Winder, Vedant Gulve, Kimberly Amador, Matthias Wilms, Nils D. Forkert
Artificial intelligence (AI) models trained using medical images for clinical tasks often exhibit bias in the form of disparities in performance between subgroups. Since not all sources of biases in real-world medical imaging data are easily identifiable, it is challenging to comprehensively assess how those biases are encoded in models, and how capable bias mitigation methods are at ameliorating performance disparities. In this article, we introduce a novel analysis framework for systematically and objectively investigating the impact of biases in medical images on AI models. We developed and tested this framework for conducting controlled in silico trials to assess bias in medical imaging AI using a tool for generating synthetic magnetic resonance images with known disease effects and sources of bias. The feasibility is showcased by using three counterfactual bias scenarios to measure the impact of simulated bias effects on a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier and the efficacy of three bias mitigation strategies. The analysis revealed that the simulated biases resulted in expected subgroup performance disparities when the CNN was trained on the synthetic datasets. Moreover, reweighing was identified as the most successful bias mitigation strategy for this setup, and we demonstrated how explainable AI methods can aid in investigating the manifestation of bias in the model using this framework. Developing fair AI models is a considerable challenge given that many and often unknown sources of biases can be present in medical imaging datasets. In this work, we present a novel methodology to objectively study the impact of biases and mitigation strategies on deep learning pipelines, which can support the development of clinical AI that is robust and responsible.
Read more7/2/2024
💬
0
Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models in Medicine
Yifan Yang, Qiao Jin, Furong Huang, Zhiyong Lu
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare applications offers promising advancements in medical diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and patient care. However, the susceptibility of LLMs to adversarial attacks poses a significant threat, potentially leading to harmful outcomes in delicate medical contexts. This study investigates the vulnerability of LLMs to two types of adversarial attacks in three medical tasks. Utilizing real-world patient data, we demonstrate that both open-source and proprietary LLMs are susceptible to manipulation across multiple tasks. This research further reveals that domain-specific tasks demand more adversarial data in model fine-tuning than general domain tasks for effective attack execution, especially for more capable models. We discover that while integrating adversarial data does not markedly degrade overall model performance on medical benchmarks, it does lead to noticeable shifts in fine-tuned model weights, suggesting a potential pathway for detecting and countering model attacks. This research highlights the urgent need for robust security measures and the development of defensive mechanisms to safeguard LLMs in medical applications, to ensure their safe and effective deployment in healthcare settings.
Read more6/19/2024