History repeats itself: A Baseline for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting

Read original: arXiv:2404.16726 - Published 5/1/2024 by Julia Gastinger, Christian Meilicke, Federico Errica, Timo Sztyler, Anett Schuelke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting, which aims to predict future links in Knowledge Graphs based on historical data.
  • The authors note that while there are standardized evaluation protocols for TKG models, the importance of simple baselines is often overlooked, making it difficult to assess actual progress in the field.
  • To address this, the authors propose a simple baseline for TKG Forecasting based on predicting recurring facts, which requires minimal hyperparameter tuning and no iterative training.
  • The baseline model is evaluated against 11 other methods on five datasets, and the results reveal that it outperforms many of the more complex TKG models, providing a different perspective on the state of the art.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a technique called Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting, which is used to predict future connections in a knowledge graph based on past data. Knowledge graphs are like databases that store information about the world in a structured way.

The researchers found that while there are standard ways to evaluate TKG models, the importance of using simple "baseline" models is often overlooked. Baseline models are basic models that serve as a starting point for comparison. Without properly evaluating these baselines, it can be hard to tell if the more complex TKG models are actually making significant improvements.

To address this, the researchers created a simple baseline model for TKG Forecasting. Their model predicts future connections in the knowledge graph by looking for facts that have occurred repeatedly in the past. This model is easy to set up and doesn't require a lot of fine-tuning of parameters.

The researchers then tested their baseline model against 11 other, more complex TKG models on five different datasets. Surprisingly, their simple baseline model ranked first or third in three of the five datasets, suggesting that the current state-of-the-art TKG models may not be as much of an improvement as previously thought. This provides a different perspective on the progress being made in this field.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a simple baseline for Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting, which aims to predict future links in a knowledge graph based on its historical evolution. The authors note that while there are standardized evaluation protocols for TKG models, the importance of simple baselines is often overlooked, making it difficult to assess actual progress in the field.

To address this gap, the authors designed an intuitive baseline for TKG Forecasting based on predicting recurring facts. This baseline requires little hyperparameter tuning and no iterative training, in contrast to many complex TKG models. The authors hypothesize that this baseline can help identify failure modes in existing TKG approaches.

The authors evaluated their proposed baseline against 11 other TKG methods on five datasets. Surprisingly, the baseline ranked first or third in three of the five datasets, providing a radically different perspective on the predictive quality of the state of the art. This suggests that the current TKG models may not be as much of an improvement over simple baselines as previously thought.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important points about the need for rigorous evaluation and the role of simple baselines in assessing progress in the field of Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting. The authors' finding that their simple baseline model outperforms many of the more complex TKG models on several datasets is quite unexpected and challenges the conventional wisdom in the field.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons why the baseline model performs so well. It would be helpful to understand the specific strengths and limitations of the baseline approach compared to the more sophisticated TKG models. Additionally, the paper does not address how the baseline model could be further improved or extended to better capture the dynamics of knowledge graph evolution.

Another area for further research could be exploring the generalization capabilities of the baseline model across different types of knowledge graphs and forecasting tasks. It would also be interesting to see how the baseline model performs on more complex temporal reasoning or data integration tasks.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the importance of simple baselines in evaluating progress in the field of TKG Forecasting. The authors' findings suggest the need for a more critical and rigorous approach to assessing the state of the art in this domain.

Conclusion

The paper presents an interesting and unexpected finding in the field of Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting. By designing a simple baseline model that predicts recurring facts, the authors were able to outperform many of the more complex TKG models on several benchmark datasets.

This work challenges the conventional wisdom in the field and suggests that the current state of the art may not be as significant an improvement over simple baselines as previously thought. The authors' findings highlight the importance of rigorously evaluating the performance of TKG models against intuitive baselines, as this can provide valuable insights into the true progress being made in the field.

Going forward, this research could inspire further exploration of the strengths and limitations of the baseline model, as well as investigations into how it could be extended or combined with other approaches to achieve even better performance on time series forecasting tasks. Overall, this paper serves as a valuable reminder of the need for critical thinking and careful evaluation in the pursuit of advancing the state of the art in Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

History repeats itself: A Baseline for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting

Julia Gastinger, Christian Meilicke, Federico Errica, Timo Sztyler, Anett Schuelke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) Forecasting aims at predicting links in Knowledge Graphs for future timesteps based on a history of Knowledge Graphs. To this day, standardized evaluation protocols and rigorous comparison across TKG models are available, but the importance of simple baselines is often neglected in the evaluation, which prevents researchers from discerning actual and fictitious progress. We propose to close this gap by designing an intuitive baseline for TKG Forecasting based on predicting recurring facts. Compared to most TKG models, it requires little hyperparameter tuning and no iterative training. Further, it can help to identify failure modes in existing approaches. The empirical findings are quite unexpected: compared to 11 methods on five datasets, our baseline ranks first or third in three of them, painting a radically different picture of the predictive quality of the state of the art.

Read more

5/1/2024

Chain-of-History Reasoning for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting
Total Score

0

Chain-of-History Reasoning for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting

Yuwei Xia, Ding Wang, Qiang Liu, Liang Wang, Shu Wu, Xiaoyu Zhang

Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) forecasting aims to predict future facts based on given histories. Most recent graph-based models excel at capturing structural information within TKGs but lack semantic comprehension abilities. Nowadays, with the surge of LLMs, the LLM-based TKG prediction model has emerged. However, the existing LLM-based model exhibits three shortcomings: (1) It only focuses on the first-order history for prediction while ignoring high-order historical information, resulting in the provided information for LLMs being extremely limited. (2) LLMs struggle with optimal reasoning performance under heavy historical information loads. (3) For TKG prediction, the temporal reasoning capability of LLM alone is limited. To address the first two challenges, we propose Chain-of-History (CoH) reasoning which explores high-order histories step-by-step, achieving effective utilization of high-order historical information for LLMs on TKG prediction. To address the third issue, we design CoH as a plug-and-play module to enhance the performance of graph-based models for TKG prediction. Extensive experiments on three datasets and backbones demonstrate the effectiveness of CoH.

Read more

6/10/2024

Selective Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Total Score

0

Selective Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning

Zhongni Hou, Xiaolong Jin, Zixuan Li, Long Bai, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng

Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG), which characterizes temporally evolving facts in the form of (subject, relation, object, timestamp), has attracted much attention recently. TKG reasoning aims to predict future facts based on given historical ones. However, existing TKG reasoning models are unable to abstain from predictions they are uncertain, which will inevitably bring risks in real-world applications. Thus, in this paper, we propose an abstention mechanism for TKG reasoning, which helps the existing models make selective, instead of indiscriminate, predictions. Specifically, we develop a confidence estimator, called Confidence Estimator with History (CEHis), to enable the existing TKG reasoning models to first estimate their confidence in making predictions, and then abstain from those with low confidence. To do so, CEHis takes two kinds of information into consideration, namely, the certainty of the current prediction and the accuracy of historical predictions. Experiments with representative TKG reasoning models on two benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed CEHis.

Read more

4/3/2024

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Meets Data-Driven Tabula Rasa Approach for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting
Total Score

0

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Meets Data-Driven Tabula Rasa Approach for Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting

Geethan Sannidhi, Sagar Srinivas Sakhinana, Venkataramana Runkana

Pre-trained large language models (PLLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Gemini face challenges such as inaccurate factual recall, hallucinations, biases, and future data leakage for temporal Knowledge Graph (tKG) forecasting. To address these issues, we introduce sLA-tKGF (small-scale language assistant for tKG forecasting), which utilizes Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aided, custom-trained small-scale language models through a tabula rasa approach from scratch for effective tKG forecasting. Our framework constructs knowledge-infused prompts with relevant historical data from tKGs, web search results, and PLLMs-generated textual descriptions to understand historical entity relationships prior to the target time. It leverages these external knowledge-infused prompts for deeper understanding and reasoning of context-specific semantic and temporal information to zero-shot prompt small-scale language models for more accurate predictions of future events within tKGs. It reduces hallucinations and mitigates distributional shift challenges through comprehending changing trends over time. As a result, it enables more accurate and contextually grounded forecasts of future events while minimizing computational demands. Rigorous empirical studies demonstrate our framework robustness, scalability, and state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on benchmark datasets with interpretable and trustworthy tKG forecasting.

Read more

8/27/2024