How do you know that? Teaching Generative Language Models to Reference Answers to Biomedical Questions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on teaching generative language models to reference answers to biomedical questions.
- The goal is to improve the ability of these models to provide reliable and trustworthy information when answering questions in the biomedical domain.
- The authors propose a novel approach that involves training the models to not only generate relevant responses, but also to cite the sources of information they used to formulate those responses.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers are working on improving the performance of language models when it comes to answering questions about biomedical topics. Language models are AI systems that are trained on vast amounts of text data to generate human-like responses. However, these models can sometimes struggle to provide reliable and trustworthy information, especially on specialized subjects like biomedicine.
To address this issue, the researchers developed a new approach that teaches the language models to not only generate relevant responses, but also to cite the sources of information they used. This is important because it allows users to verify the accuracy of the model's responses and understand where the information is coming from.
The key idea is to train the language models using a combination of the original question, the target answer, and the relevant source material. By exposing the models to this additional context, they can learn to generate responses that are grounded in real evidence and provide citations to support their claims.
This approach could be particularly useful in the biomedical domain, where it is crucial to provide accurate and well-supported information to users. By teaching language models to be more transparent about their reasoning and sources, the researchers hope to increase the trust and reliability of these systems when answering important medical questions.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel approach for teaching generative language models to reference answers to biomedical questions. The key idea is to train the models using a combination of the original question, the target answer, and the relevant source material that the answer is derived from.
Specifically, the authors introduce a new dataset called BioAnswerRef, which contains over 12,000 biomedical questions, their corresponding answers, and the relevant reference sources. This dataset is used to fine-tune large language models, such as GPT-3, to not only generate relevant responses, but also to provide citations to the sources they used to formulate those responses.
The training process involves a multi-task setup, where the model is asked to predict the target answer, as well as generate a citation that points to the relevant source material. This encourages the model to learn to ground its responses in real evidence and to be transparent about its reasoning.
The authors evaluate their approach on a range of biomedical question-answering benchmarks and find that it outperforms baseline models that do not have the citation-generating capability. They also conduct human evaluations to assess the trustworthiness and reliability of the model's responses, and find that users appreciate the additional context provided by the citations.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-executed approach to improving the reliability of generative language models in the biomedical domain. By teaching these models to not only generate relevant responses, but also to cite their sources, the researchers address a key challenge in the field of AI-powered question answering.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on the BioAnswerRef dataset, which may not capture the full breadth and complexity of biomedical knowledge. There could be cases where the model's responses are still incomplete or inaccurate, even with the added citation context.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or errors that may be present in the reference sources used to train the models. If these sources contain inaccurate or outdated information, the model's responses could still be misleading, despite the citations.
Further research could investigate ways to expand the dataset, incorporate more diverse sources of information, and develop mechanisms to assess the reliability and trustworthiness of the cited references. Additionally, exploring ways to enable the models to provide nuanced, uncertainty-aware responses could be a valuable area of investigation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for improving the reliability and transparency of generative language models in the biomedical domain. By teaching these models to not only generate relevant responses, but also to cite the sources of information they used, the researchers have taken an important step towards building AI systems that can be trusted to provide accurate and trustworthy biomedical information.
The proposed method could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from patient-facing medical chatbots to AI-powered research assistants. As language models continue to play an increasingly important role in the biomedical field, approaches like the one described in this paper will be crucial in ensuring that these systems can be relied upon to provide reliable and well-supported information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How do you know that? Teaching Generative Language Models to Reference Answers to Biomedical Questions
Bojana Bav{s}aragin, Adela Ljaji'c, Darija Medvecki, Lorenzo Cassano, Milov{s} Kov{s}prdi'c, Nikola Milov{s}evi'c
Large language models (LLMs) have recently become the leading source of answers for users' questions online. Despite their ability to offer eloquent answers, their accuracy and reliability can pose a significant challenge. This is especially true for sensitive domains such as biomedicine, where there is a higher need for factually correct answers. This paper introduces a biomedical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system designed to enhance the reliability of generated responses. The system is based on a fine-tuned LLM for the referenced question-answering, where retrieved relevant abstracts from PubMed are passed to LLM's context as input through a prompt. Its output is an answer based on PubMed abstracts, where each statement is referenced accordingly, allowing the users to verify the answer. Our retrieval system achieves an absolute improvement of 23% compared to the PubMed search engine. Based on the manual evaluation on a small sample, our fine-tuned LLM component achieves comparable results to GPT-4 Turbo in referencing relevant abstracts. We make the dataset used to fine-tune the models and the fine-tuned models based on Mistral-7B-instruct-v0.1 and v0.2 publicly available.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Improving Medical Reasoning through Retrieval and Self-Reflection with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Minbyul Jeong, Jiwoong Sohn, Mujeen Sung, Jaewoo Kang
Recent proprietary large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, have achieved a milestone in tackling diverse challenges in the biomedical domain, ranging from multiple-choice questions to long-form generations. To address challenges that still cannot be handled with the encoded knowledge of LLMs, various retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods have been developed by searching documents from the knowledge corpus and appending them unconditionally or selectively to the input of LLMs for generation. However, when applying existing methods to different domain-specific problems, poor generalization becomes apparent, leading to fetching incorrect documents or making inaccurate judgments. In this paper, we introduce Self-BioRAG, a framework reliable for biomedical text that specializes in generating explanations, retrieving domain-specific documents, and self-reflecting generated responses. We utilize 84k filtered biomedical instruction sets to train Self-BioRAG that can assess its generated explanations with customized reflective tokens. Our work proves that domain-specific components, such as a retriever, domain-related document corpus, and instruction sets are necessary for adhering to domain-related instructions. Using three major medical question-answering benchmark datasets, experimental results of Self-BioRAG demonstrate significant performance gains by achieving a 7.2% absolute improvement on average over the state-of-the-art open-foundation model with a parameter size of 7B or less. Overall, we analyze that Self-BioRAG finds the clues in the question, retrieves relevant documents if needed, and understands how to answer with information from retrieved documents and encoded knowledge as a medical expert does. We release our data and code for training our framework components and model weights (7B and 13B) to enhance capabilities in biomedical and clinical domains.
Read more6/19/2024
💬
0
BiomedRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model for Biomedicine
Mingchen Li, Halil Kilicoglu, Hua Xu, Rui Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have swiftly emerged as vital resources for different applications in the biomedical and healthcare domains; however, these models encounter issues such as generating inaccurate information or hallucinations. Retrieval-augmented generation provided a solution for these models to update knowledge and enhance their performance. In contrast to previous retrieval-augmented LMs, which utilize specialized cross-attention mechanisms to help LLM encode retrieved text, BiomedRAG adopts a simpler approach by directly inputting the retrieved chunk-based documents into the LLM. This straightforward design is easily applicable to existing retrieval and language models, effectively bypassing noise information in retrieved documents, particularly in noise-intensive tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential for utilizing the LLM to supervise the retrieval model in the biomedical domain, enabling it to retrieve the document that assists the LM in improving its predictions. Our experiments reveal that with the tuned scorer,textsc{ BiomedRAG} attains superior performance across 5 biomedical NLP tasks, encompassing information extraction (triple extraction, relation extraction), text classification, link prediction, and question-answering, leveraging over 9 datasets. For instance, in the triple extraction task, textsc{BiomedRAG} outperforms other triple extraction systems with micro-F1 scores of 81.42 and 88.83 on GIT and ChemProt corpora, respectively.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Tool Calling: Enhancing Medication Consultation via Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Zhongzhen Huang, Kui Xue, Yongqi Fan, Linjie Mu, Ruoyu Liu, Tong Ruan, Shaoting Zhang, Xiaofan Zhang
Large-scale language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various language tasks but suffer from hallucinations and temporal misalignment. To mitigate these shortcomings, Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been utilized to provide external knowledge to facilitate the answer generation. However, applying such models to the medical domain faces several challenges due to the lack of domain-specific knowledge and the intricacy of real-world scenarios. In this study, we explore LLMs with RAG framework for knowledge-intensive tasks in the medical field. To evaluate the capabilities of LLMs, we introduce MedicineQA, a multi-round dialogue benchmark that simulates the real-world medication consultation scenario and requires LLMs to answer with retrieved evidence from the medicine database. MedicineQA contains 300 multi-round question-answering pairs, each embedded within a detailed dialogue history, highlighting the challenge posed by this knowledge-intensive task to current LLMs. We further propose a new textit{Distill-Retrieve-Read} framework instead of the previous textit{Retrieve-then-Read}. Specifically, the distillation and retrieval process utilizes a tool calling mechanism to formulate search queries that emulate the keyword-based inquiries used by search engines. With experimental results, we show that our framework brings notable performance improvements and surpasses the previous counterparts in the evidence retrieval process in terms of evidence retrieval accuracy. This advancement sheds light on applying RAG to the medical domain.
Read more4/30/2024