How Does Quantization Affect Multilingual LLMs?

Read original: arXiv:2407.03211 - Published 7/4/2024 by Kelly Marchisio, Saurabh Dash, Hongyu Chen, Dennis Aumiller, Ahmet Ustun, Sara Hooker, Sebastian Ruder

🤯

Overview

This paper investigates how quantization, a technique to reduce the size and computational cost of large language models (LLMs), affects the performance of multilingual LLMs.
The researchers evaluate different quantization strategies on several multilingual LLMs and analyze their impact on tasks like text generation, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition.
The findings provide insights into the trade-offs between model size, inference speed, and task performance when applying quantization to multilingual LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform a variety of other natural language tasks. However, these models can be very large and computationally expensive, making them difficult to deploy on resource-constrained devices like smartphones or edge computing systems.

Quantization is a technique that can be used to reduce the size and computational requirements of LLMs by reducing the precision of the model's numerical parameters. This allows the model to be more efficiently stored and processed, but it can also impact the model's performance on various tasks.

In this paper, the researchers investigate how quantization affects the performance of multilingual LLMs, which are LLMs trained on data from multiple languages. They evaluate different quantization strategies on several popular multilingual LLMs and measure the impact on tasks like text generation, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition.

The researchers find that the impact of quantization can vary depending on the specific model, the quantization strategy used, and the task being performed. In some cases, quantization can significantly reduce the model size and inference time with only a small impact on performance, while in other cases, the performance degradation may be more substantial.

These findings provide valuable insights for researchers and developers who are looking to deploy multilingual LLMs in resource-constrained environments, as they can help inform the trade-offs between model size, inference speed, and task performance when applying quantization.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the impact of quantization on the performance of several popular multilingual LLMs, including mT5, mBART, and XLM-R. The researchers apply different quantization strategies, such as weight-only quantization and mixed precision quantization, to these models and measure their performance on a variety of natural language tasks, including text generation, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition.

The results show that the impact of quantization can vary depending on the specific model and task. For example, the researchers find that weight-only quantization can reduce the model size by up to 75% with only a small impact on text generation performance, but the same level of quantization can lead to a more significant degradation in performance on tasks like sentiment analysis.

The paper also explores the trade-offs between model size, inference speed, and task performance when applying different quantization strategies. The researchers find that more aggressive quantization (e.g., using lower-precision data types) can result in faster inference times but may also lead to greater performance degradation, particularly on more complex tasks.

The researchers also analyze the impact of quantization on the generalization ability of the models, finding that quantization can sometimes improve generalization performance, particularly on tasks where the model is overparameterized.

Overall, the findings of this paper provide valuable insights for researchers and developers working on deploying multilingual LLMs in resource-constrained environments. The paper highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the trade-offs between model size, inference speed, and task performance when applying quantization strategies to these models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of quantization strategies for multilingual LLMs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

Task Diversity: The paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of natural language tasks, such as text generation, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition. It would be valuable to explore the impact of quantization on a wider range of tasks, including more complex tasks like question answering, language understanding, and code generation.
Language Coverage: While the paper evaluates several popular multilingual LLMs, the language coverage is still relatively limited. It would be interesting to see how quantization affects the performance of LLMs trained on an even broader set of languages, particularly under-resourced languages.
Hardware Considerations: The paper does not delve deeply into the hardware-specific implications of quantization, such as the potential performance benefits on different hardware architectures or the impact on power consumption. Further research in this area could provide more practical guidance for deploying quantized LLMs in real-world systems.
Interpretability: The paper does not explore the impact of quantization on the interpretability or explainability of the multilingual LLMs. As these models become more widely deployed, understanding how quantization affects their inner workings and decision-making processes will be increasingly important.

Overall, this paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of quantization strategies for multilingual LLMs, but there is still room for further research to fully unlock the potential of this technology.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of how quantization affects the performance of multilingual large language models (LLMs). The researchers apply various quantization strategies to popular multilingual LLMs, such as mT5, mBART, and XLM-R, and measure their performance on tasks like text generation, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition.

The findings reveal that the impact of quantization can vary depending on the specific model, the quantization strategy used, and the task being performed. In some cases, quantization can significantly reduce the model size and inference time with only a small impact on performance, while in other cases, the performance degradation may be more substantial.

These insights are valuable for researchers and developers who are looking to deploy multilingual LLMs in resource-constrained environments, as they can help inform the trade-offs between model size, inference speed, and task performance when applying quantization. The paper also highlights the need for further research to explore the impact of quantization on a wider range of tasks and languages, as well as the hardware-specific implications and the effects on model interpretability.

Overall, this study provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of quantization strategies for multilingual LLMs, paving the way for more efficient and effective deployment of these powerful AI systems in real-world applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

How Does Quantization Affect Multilingual LLMs?

Kelly Marchisio, Saurabh Dash, Hongyu Chen, Dennis Aumiller, Ahmet Ustun, Sara Hooker, Sebastian Ruder

Quantization techniques are widely used to improve inference speed and deployment of large language models. While a wide body of work examines the impact of quantized LLMs on English tasks, none have examined the effect of quantization across languages. We conduct a thorough analysis of quantized multilingual LLMs, focusing on their performance across languages and at varying scales. We use automatic benchmarks, LLM-as-a-Judge methods, and human evaluation, finding that (1) harmful effects of quantization are apparent in human evaluation, and automatic metrics severely underestimate the detriment: a 1.7% average drop in Japanese across automatic tasks corresponds to a 16.0% drop reported by human evaluators on realistic prompts; (2) languages are disparately affected by quantization, with non-Latin script languages impacted worst; and (3) challenging tasks such as mathematical reasoning degrade fastest. As the ability to serve low-compute models is critical for wide global adoption of NLP technologies, our results urge consideration of multilingual performance as a key evaluation criterion for efficient models.

7/4/2024

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models

Renren Jin, Jiangcun Du, Wuwei Huang, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Deyi Xiong

Increasing the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) usually improves performance in downstream tasks but raises compute and memory costs, making deployment difficult in resource-limited settings. Quantization techniques, which reduce the bits needed for model weights or activations with minimal performance loss, have become popular due to the rise of LLMs. However, most quantization studies use pre-trained LLMs, and the impact of quantization on instruction-tuned LLMs and the relationship between perplexity and benchmark performance of quantized LLMs are not well understood. Evaluation of quantized LLMs is often limited to language modeling and a few classification tasks, leaving their performance on other benchmarks unclear. To address these gaps, we propose a structured evaluation framework consisting of three critical dimensions: (1) knowledge & capacity, (2) alignment, and (3) efficiency, and conduct extensive experiments across ten diverse benchmarks. Our experimental results indicate that LLMs with 4-bit quantization can retain performance comparable to their non-quantized counterparts, and perplexity can serve as a proxy metric for quantized LLMs on most benchmarks. Furthermore, quantized LLMs with larger parameter scales can outperform smaller LLMs. Despite the memory savings achieved through quantization, it can also slow down the inference speed of LLMs. Consequently, substantial engineering efforts and hardware support are imperative to achieve a balanced optimization of decoding speed and memory consumption in the context of quantized LLMs.

6/7/2024

When Quantization Affects Confidence of Large Language Models?

Irina Proskurina, Luc Brun, Guillaume Metzler, Julien Velcin

Recent studies introduced effective compression techniques for Large Language Models (LLMs) via post-training quantization or low-bit weight representation. Although quantized weights offer storage efficiency and allow for faster inference, existing works have indicated that quantization might compromise performance and exacerbate biases in LLMs. This study investigates the confidence and calibration of quantized models, considering factors such as language model type and scale as contributors to quantization loss. Firstly, we reveal that quantization with GPTQ to 4-bit results in a decrease in confidence regarding true labels, with varying impacts observed among different language models. Secondly, we observe fluctuations in the impact on confidence across different scales. Finally, we propose an explanation for quantization loss based on confidence levels, indicating that quantization disproportionately affects samples where the full model exhibited low confidence levels in the first place.

5/2/2024

💬

Evaluating Quantized Large Language Models

Shiyao Li, Xuefei Ning, Luning Wang, Tengxuan Liu, Xiangsheng Shi, Shengen Yan, Guohao Dai, Huazhong Yang, Yu Wang

Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising technique to reduce the cost of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, PTQ can effectively mitigate memory consumption and reduce computational overhead in LLMs. To meet the requirements of both high efficiency and performance across diverse scenarios, a comprehensive evaluation of quantized LLMs is essential to guide the selection of quantization methods. This paper presents a thorough evaluation of these factors by evaluating the effect of PTQ on Weight, Activation, and KV Cache on 11 model families, including OPT, LLaMA2, Falcon, Bloomz, Mistral, ChatGLM, Vicuna, LongChat, StableLM, Gemma, and Mamba, with parameters ranging from 125M to 180B. The evaluation encompasses five types of tasks: basic NLP, emergent ability, trustworthiness, dialogue, and long-context tasks. Moreover, we also evaluate the state-of-the-art (SOTA) quantization methods to demonstrate their applicability. Based on the extensive experiments, we systematically summarize the effect of quantization, provide recommendations to apply quantization techniques, and point out future directions. The code can be found in https://github.com/thu-nics/qllm-eval.

6/7/2024