How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect misleading visualizations
- Focuses on understanding the strengths and limitations of LLMs in this task
- Compares the performance of different LLM models on a dataset of misleading visualizations
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers investigate how well Large Language Models (LLMs) can detect misleading visualizations. Misleading visualizations are data visualizations that may distort or misrepresent the underlying data, either intentionally or unintentionally.
The researchers create a dataset of different types of misleading visualizations, such as charts with skewed axes or deliberately misleading labels. They then test several popular LLM models, like GPT-3 and BERT, to see how accurately they can identify these misleading visualizations.
The results suggest that LLMs can be reasonably effective at detecting certain types of misleading visualizations, but they also have significant limitations. For example, LLMs may struggle to identify more subtle or complex forms of visualization manipulation.
Overall, the paper provides useful insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs when it comes to multimodal misinformation detection. This information can help guide the development of more robust visualization literacy tools and techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the existing research on misleading visualizations and the potential for LLMs to detect them. The authors note that while LLMs have shown promise in various language-based tasks, their ability to reason about visual information and identify misleading visualizations is less well-understood.
To investigate this, the researchers create a dataset of over 1,000 visualizations, including both misleading and non-misleading examples. They categorize the misleading visualizations into different types, such as those with skewed axes, distorted scales, or deceptive labeling.
The researchers then evaluate the performance of several popular LLM models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on the task of classifying the visualizations as misleading or not. They find that the LLMs are generally able to detect certain types of misleading visualizations, such as those with obvious distortions, with reasonable accuracy.
However, the models struggle more with more subtle forms of visualization manipulation, such as those that rely on cognitive biases or take advantage of the limitations of human perception. The authors also note that the performance of the LLMs varies significantly depending on the specific model and configuration used.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of LLMs' capabilities in the realm of visual misinformation detection. The researchers have done a commendable job in creating a well-curated dataset of misleading visualizations and testing a range of LLM models on this task.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on the ability of LLMs to detect misleading visualizations, without considering other modalities or the broader context in which these visualizations may be presented. In real-world scenarios, multimodal information (e.g., text, images, and other contextual cues) may be necessary for effective misinformation detection.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in this domain, it would be useful to see more in-depth analysis of the specific factors that contribute to the models' performance, such as the complexity of the visualization, the type of misleading element, or the linguistic complexity of the accompanying text.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs when it comes to detecting misleading visualizations. The researchers have created a robust dataset and conducted a thorough evaluation of several popular LLM models.
The findings suggest that LLMs can be reasonably effective at identifying certain types of misleading visualizations, but they also have significant weaknesses, particularly when it comes to more subtle or complex forms of visualization manipulation. These insights can help guide the development of more robust visualization literacy tools and techniques, which will be increasingly important as the use of data visualizations continues to grow in the digital age.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?
Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Huamin Qu
In this study, we address the growing issue of misleading charts, a prevalent problem that undermines the integrity of information dissemination. Misleading charts can distort the viewer's perception of data, leading to misinterpretations and decisions based on false information. The development of effective automatic detection methods for misleading charts is an urgent field of research. The recent advancement of multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced a promising direction for addressing this challenge. We explored the capabilities of these models in analyzing complex charts and assessing the impact of different prompting strategies on the models' analyses. We utilized a dataset of misleading charts collected from the internet by prior research and crafted nine distinct prompts, ranging from simple to complex, to test the ability of four different multimodal LLMs in detecting over 21 different chart issues. Through three experiments--from initial exploration to detailed analysis--we progressively gained insights into how to effectively prompt LLMs to identify misleading charts and developed strategies to address the scalability challenges encountered as we expanded our detection range from the initial five issues to 21 issues in the final experiment. Our findings reveal that multimodal LLMs possess a strong capability for chart comprehension and critical thinking in data interpretation. There is significant potential in employing multimodal LLMs to counter misleading information by supporting critical thinking and enhancing visualization literacy. This study demonstrates the applicability of LLMs in addressing the pressing concern of misleading charts.
Read more7/25/2024
💬
0
Exploring the Potential of the Large Language Models (LLMs) in Identifying Misleading News Headlines
Md Main Uddin Rony, Md Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Ali, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Naeemul Hassan
In the digital age, the prevalence of misleading news headlines poses a significant challenge to information integrity, necessitating robust detection mechanisms. This study explores the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in identifying misleading versus non-misleading news headlines. Utilizing a dataset of 60 articles, sourced from both reputable and questionable outlets across health, science & tech, and business domains, we employ three LLMs- ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Gemini-for classification. Our analysis reveals significant variance in model performance, with ChatGPT-4 demonstrating superior accuracy, especially in cases with unanimous annotator agreement on misleading headlines. The study emphasizes the importance of human-centered evaluation in developing LLMs that can navigate the complexities of misinformation detection, aligning technical proficiency with nuanced human judgment. Our findings contribute to the discourse on AI ethics, emphasizing the need for models that are not only technically advanced but also ethically aligned and sensitive to the subtleties of human interpretation.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models
Sahar Tahmasebi, Eric Muller-Budack, Ralph Ewerth
The increasing proliferation of misinformation and its alarming impact have motivated both industry and academia to develop approaches for misinformation detection and fact checking. Recent advances on large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks, but whether and how LLMs could help with misinformation detection remains relatively underexplored. Most of existing state-of-the-art approaches either do not consider evidence and solely focus on claim related features or assume the evidence to be provided. Few approaches consider evidence retrieval as part of the misinformation detection but rely on fine-tuning models. In this paper, we investigate the potential of LLMs for misinformation detection in a zero-shot setting. We incorporate an evidence retrieval component into the process as it is crucial to gather pertinent information from various sources to detect the veracity of claims. To this end, we propose a novel re-ranking approach for multimodal evidence retrieval using both LLMs and large vision-language models (LVLM). The retrieved evidence samples (images and texts) serve as the input for an LVLM-based approach for multimodal fact verification (LVLM4FV). To enable a fair evaluation, we address the issue of incomplete ground truth for evidence samples in an existing evidence retrieval dataset by annotating a more complete set of evidence samples for both image and text retrieval. Our experimental results on two datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach in both evidence retrieval and fact verification tasks and also better generalization capability across dataset compared to the supervised baseline.
Read more7/22/2024
👀
0
Are Large Vision Language Models up to the Challenge of Chart Comprehension and Reasoning? An Extensive Investigation into the Capabilities and Limitations of LVLMs
Mohammed Saidul Islam, Raian Rahman, Ahmed Masry, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Enamul Hoque
Natural language is a powerful complementary modality of communication for data visualizations, such as bar and line charts. To facilitate chart-based reasoning using natural language, various downstream tasks have been introduced recently such as chart question answering, chart summarization, and fact-checking with charts. These tasks pose a unique challenge, demanding both vision-language reasoning and a nuanced understanding of chart data tables, visual encodings, and natural language prompts. Despite the recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse NLP tasks, their abilities and limitations in the realm of data visualization remain under-explored, possibly due to their lack of multi-modal capabilities. To bridge the gap, this paper presents the first comprehensive evaluation of the recently developed large vision language models (LVLMs) for chart understanding and reasoning tasks. Our evaluation includes a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs, including GPT-4V and Gemini, across four major chart reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we perform a qualitative evaluation of LVLMs' performance on a diverse range of charts, aiming to provide a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. Our findings reveal that LVLMs demonstrate impressive abilities in generating fluent texts covering high-level data insights while also encountering common problems like hallucinations, factual errors, and data bias. We highlight the key strengths and limitations of chart comprehension tasks, offering insights for future research.
Read more6/4/2024